World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
17838
World Ranking
8207
National Ranking
2922

Jay H. Lawrimore publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay H. Lawrimore sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 75 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jay H. Lawrimore D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay H. Lawrimore sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay H. Lawrimore is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research spans various areas within Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. The primary focus includes subfields such as Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's work covers topics including:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Precipitation Measurement and Analysis

Jay H. Lawrimore has contributed publications to several respected scientific venues. Notable publication venues include:

  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology

Recent papers authored by Jay H. Lawrimore include:

  • Implementing Full Spatial Coverage in NOAA's Global Temperature Analysis, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Quality Control and Processing of Cooperative Observer Program Hourly Precipitation Data, 2020, Journal of Hydrometeorology

Their frequent collaborators are:

  • Matthew J. Menne
  • Russell S. Vose
  • Boyin Huang
  • X. Yin
  • Derek S. Arndt

Lawrimore's work primarily investigates climate and atmospheric conditions using observational data and modeling techniques. This includes the analysis of precipitation data quality control and the enhancement of temperature dataset coverage at a global scale.

Best Publications

  • Improvements to NOAA’s Historical Merged Land–Ocean Surface Temperature Analysis (1880–2006)

    Thomas M. Smith;Richard W. Reynolds;Thomas C. Peterson;Jay Lawrimore

  • Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature, Version 5 (ERSSTv5): Upgrades, Validations, and Intercomparisons

    Boyin Huang;Peter W. Thorne;Viva F. Banzon;Tim Boyer

  • Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature Version 4 (ERSST.v4). Part I: Upgrades and Intercomparisons

    Boyin Huang;Viva F. Banzon;Eric Freeman;Jay Lawrimore

  • Contemporary Changes of the Hydrological Cycle over the Contiguous United States: Trends Derived from In Situ Observations

    Pavel Ya Groisman;Richard W. Knight;Thomas R. Karl;David R. Easterling

  • Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus

    Thomas R. Karl;Anthony Arguez;Boyin Huang;Jay H. Lawrimore

  • An overview of the Global Historical Climatology Network monthly mean temperature data set, version 3

    Jay H. Lawrimore;Matthew J. Menne;Byron E. Gleason;Claude N. Williams

  • Climate Assessment for 1999

    Gerald D. Bell;Michael S. Halpert;Russell C. Schnell;R. Wayne Higgins

  • Monitoring and Understanding Trends in Extreme Storms: State of Knowledge

    Kenneth E. Kunkel;Thomas R. Karl;Harold Brooks;James Kossin

  • U.S. Climate Reference Network after One Decade of Operations: Status and Assessment

    Howard J. Diamond;Thomas R. Karl;Michael A. Palecki;C. Bruce Baker

  • ICOADS Release 3.0: a major update to the historical marine climate record

    Eric Freeman;Scott D. Woodruff;Scott D. Woodruff;Steven J. Worley;Sandra J. Lubker

  • Changes in extreme events and the potential impacts on human health.

    Jesse E. Bell;Claudia Langford Brown;Kathryn Conlon;Stephanie Herring

  • U.S. Climate Reference Network Soil Moisture and Temperature Observations

    Jesse E. Bell;Michael A. Palecki;C. Bruce Baker;William G. Collins

  • Evaporation changes over the contiguous United States and the former USSR: A reassessment

    Valentin S. Golubev;Jay H. Lawrimore;Pavel Ya. Groisman;Pavel Ya. Groisman;Nina A. Speranskaya

  • NOAA's Merged Land-Ocean Surface Temperature Analysis

    Russell S. Vose;Derek Arndt;Viva F. Banzon;David R. Easterling

  • The Global Historical Climatology Network Monthly Temperature Dataset, Version 4

    Matthew J. Menne;Claude N. Williams;Byron E. Gleason;J. Jared Rennie

  • Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature Version 4 (ERSST.v4): Part II. Parametric and Structural Uncertainty Estimations

    Wei Liu;Boyin Huang;Peter W. Thorne;Viva F. Banzon

  • Pan Evaporation Trends in Dry and Humid Regions of the United States

    Jay H. Lawrimore;Thomas C. Peterson

  • Further exploring and quantifying uncertainties for Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature (ERSST) version 4 (v4).

    Boyin Huang;Peter W. Thorne;Thomas M. Smith;Wei Liu

  • Global rural temperature trends

    Thomas C. Peterson;Kevin P. Gallo;Jay Lawrimore;Timothy W. Owen

  • Projections of Future Drought in the Continental United States and Mexico

    Michael Wehner;David R. Easterling;Jay H. Lawrimore;Richard R. Heim

  • Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature Version 4 (ERSST.v4), Part I. Upgrades and Intercomparisons

    B. Huang;E. Freeman;J. H. Lawrimore;W. Liu

  • Monitoring and Understanding Trends in Extreme Storms: State of Knowledge

    Kenneth E. Kunkel;Thomas R. Karl;Harold Brooks;James P. Kossin

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Thorne
Peter Thorne National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Thomas C. Peterson
Thomas C. Peterson National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Russell S. Vose
Russell S. Vose National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Claude N. Williams
Claude N. Williams National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Thomas R. Karl
Thomas R. Karl National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Thomas M. Smith
Thomas M. Smith National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
David R. Easterling
David R. Easterling National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
David A. Robinson
David A. Robinson Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Kenneth E. Kunkel
Kenneth E. Kunkel North Carolina State University
Wei Liu
Wei Liu University of California, Riverside

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, there are several related online degree options that can broaden career opportunities. Among these, some programs are recognized as more accessible, such as those highlighted in easiest bachelor degree listings, offering a balanced approach to gaining knowledge without overwhelming course loads.

If you want to specialize further, pursuing a geology degree can be an excellent choice. Numerous universities offer quality geology degrees online, allowing students to study earth sciences, mineralogy, and environmental impact analysis from anywhere.

Another promising field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which supports environmental monitoring and management. Many top-tier programs provide the best GIS graduate programs accessible online, preparing graduates for roles in mapping, data analysis, and spatial planning.

For those inclined toward policy-making and public administration related to environmental issues, a Master of Public Administration (MPA) can be valuable. Some of the best online MPA programs offer flexible, accelerated options to develop leadership skills and influence environmental policies effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Jay H. Lawrimore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles