World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
19144
World Ranking
3359
National Ranking
1626

Marten van Dijk publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marten van Dijk sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 225 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marten van Dijk D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marten van Dijk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marten van Dijk is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States and specializes in the field of Computer Science. Their research spans several subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Hardware and Architecture, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Information Systems, and Signal Processing.

The main topics of Marten van Dijk's work include:

  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques

Van Dijk has published extensively, with a significant number of papers appearing in notable venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Access, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), and the IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems.

Some recent publications include:

  • "On the Robustness of Vision Transformers to Adversarial Examples," 2021, 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
  • "Splitting the Interpose PUF: A Novel Modeling Attack Strategy," 2020, IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
  • "Finite-sum smooth optimization with SARAH," 2022, Computational Optimization and Applications
  • "Splitting the Interpose PUF: A Novel Modeling Attack Strategy," 2020, CWI's Institutional Repository (Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica)
  • "A Unified Convergence Analysis for Shuffling-Type Gradient Methods," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent collaborators in van Dijk's research activities include Phuong Ha Nguyen, Kaleel Mahmood, Lam M. Nguyen, Chenglu Jin, and Toan N. Nguyen.

Best Publications

  • Fully homomorphic encryption over the integers

    Marten van Dijk;Craig Gentry;Shai Halevi;Vinod Vaikuntanathan

  • Silicon physical random functions

    Blaise Gassend;Dwaine Clarke;Marten van Dijk;Srinivas Devadas

  • Extracting secret keys from integrated circuits

    Daihyun Lim;J.W. Lee;B. Gassend;G.E. Suh

  • Path ORAM: An Extremely Simple Oblivious RAM Protocol.

    Emil Stefanov;Marten van Dijk;Elaine Shi;Christopher W. Fletcher

  • A technique to build a secret key in integrated circuits for identification and authentication applications

    J.W. Lee;Daihyun Lim;B. Gassend;G.E. Suh

  • AEGIS: architecture for tamper-evident and tamper-resistant processing

    G. Edward Suh;Dwaine Clarke;Blaise Gassend;Marten van Dijk

  • Controlled physical random functions

    B. Gassend;D. Clarke;M. van Dijk;S. Devadas

  • Identification and authentication of integrated circuits

    Blaise Gassend;Daihyun Lim;Dwaine E. Clarke;Marten van Dijk

  • Caches and hash trees for efficient memory integrity verification

    B. Gassend;G.E. Suh;D. Clarke;M. van Dijk

  • Efficient memory integrity verification and encryption for secure processors

    G. Edward Suh;Dwaine Clarke;Blaise Gassend;Marten van Dijk

  • On the impossibility of cryptography alone for privacy-preserving cloud computing

    Marten Van Dijk;Ari Juels

  • FlipIt: The Game of Stealthy Takeover

    Marten Dijk;Ari Juels;Alina Oprea;Ronald L. Rivest

  • Iris: a scalable cloud file system with efficient integrity checks

    Emil Stefanov;Marten van Dijk;Ari Juels;Alina Oprea

  • A secure processor architecture for encrypted computation on untrusted programs

    Christopher W. Fletcher;Marten van Dijk;Srinivas Devadas

  • Analysis of the sensitivity attack against electronic watermarks in images

    Jean Paul M. G. Linnartz;Marten van Dijk

  • Onion ORAM: A Constant Bandwidth Blowup Oblivious RAM

    Srinivas Devadas;Marten van Dijk;Christopher W. Fletcher;Ling Ren

  • Path ORAM: An Extremely Simple Oblivious RAM Protocol

    Emil Stefanov;Marten Van Dijk;Elaine Shi;T.-H. Hubert Chan

  • Optical Disc System for Digital Video Recording

    Tatsuya Narahara;Shoei Kobayashi;Masayuki Hattori;Yoshihide Shimpuku

  • On the Robustness of Vision Transformers to Adversarial Examples

    Kaleel Mahmood;Rigel Mahmood;Marten van Dijk

  • Constants count: practical improvements to oblivious RAM

    Ling Ren;Christopher Fletcher;Albert Kwon;Emil Stefanov

  • Path ORAM: An Extremely Simple Oblivious RAM Protocol

    Emil Stefanov;Marten van Dijk;Elaine Shi;T-H. Hubert Chan

  • Iris: A Scalable Cloud File System with Efficient Integrity Checks.

    Emil Stefanov;Marten van Dijk;Alina Oprea;Ari Juels

Frequent Co-Authors

Ling Ren
Ling Ren University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Alina Oprea
Alina Oprea Northeastern University
Ari Juels
Ari Juels Cornell University
Pim Theo Tuyls
Pim Theo Tuyls Philips (Finland)
Elaine Shi
Elaine Shi Carnegie Mellon University
G. Edward Suh
G. Edward Suh Cornell University
David P. Woodruff
David P. Woodruff Carnegie Mellon University
Katya Scheinberg
Katya Scheinberg Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many online degrees and career routes. If you’re keen on fast-tracking your studies, consider a 1 year computer science degree online. These accelerated programs let you gain valuable skills and credentials in less time than traditional degrees.

Beyond core Computer Science, related fields such as engineering and environmental studies offer exciting, complementary options. For instance, a online mechanical engineering degree combines technical expertise with innovative problem-solving—ideal for those interested in both hardware and software.

Considering the intersection of technology and sustainability? Earning an environmental engineering degree online lets you work on real-world environmental challenges using computational tools.

Lastly, graduates often ask: what can you do with an environmental studies degree? The answer includes roles in data analysis, consulting, and technology development—pathways that align well with computer science expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Marten van Dijk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles