World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
86
Citations
40271
World Ranking
752
National Ranking
400

Ari Juels publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ari Juels sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 185 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ari Juels D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ari Juels sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ari Juels is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in computer science, focusing on information systems, computer networks and communications, artificial intelligence, management information systems, and management science and operations research.

The scientist's work primarily concentrates on blockchain technology applications and security, with additional research interests in fintech, crowdfunding, digital finance, peer-to-peer network technologies, cryptography and data security, auction theory and applications, banking stability, regulation, and efficiency, as well as distributed systems and fault tolerance.

Recent notable publications include:

  • Condorcet Attack Against Fair Transaction Ordering, 2023, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • The Ekiden Platform for Confidentiality-Preserving, Trustworthy, and Performant Smart Contracts, 2020, IEEE Security & Privacy
  • Strategic Latency Reduction in Blockchain Peer-to-Peer Networks, 2023, Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems
  • Design Choices for Central Bank Digital Currency: Policy and Technical Considerations, 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • DAO Decentralization: Voting-Bloc Entropy, Bribery, and Dark DAOs, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ari Juels include Mahimna Kelkar, Giulia Fanti, Kushal Babel, Weizhao Tang, and Lucianna Kiffer.

Publications have predominantly appeared in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Security & Privacy, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl), Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Best Publications

  • Pors: proofs of retrievability for large files

    Ari Juels;Burton S. Kaliski

  • RFID security and privacy: a research survey

    A. Juels

  • A fuzzy commitment scheme

    Ari Juels;Martin Wattenberg

  • A Fuzzy Vault Scheme

    Ari Juels;Madhu Sudan

  • On Scaling Decentralized Blockchains

    Kyle Croman;Christian Decker;Ittay Eyal;Adem Efe Gencer

  • Stealing machine learning models via prediction APIs

    Florian Tramèr;Fan Zhang;Ari Juels;Michael K. Reiter

  • HAIL: a high-availability and integrity layer for cloud storage

    Kevin D. Bowers;Ari Juels;Alina Oprea

  • The blocker tag: selective blocking of RFID tags for consumer privacy

    Ari Juels;Ronald L. Rivest;Michael Szydlo

  • Cross-VM side channels and their use to extract private keys

    Yinqian Zhang;Ari Juels;Michael K. Reiter;Thomas Ristenpart

  • Authenticating pervasive devices with human protocols

    Ari Juels;Stephen A. Weis

  • Client Puzzles: A Cryptographic Countermeasure Against Connection Depletion Attacks.

    Ari Juels;John G. Brainard

  • Proofs of retrievability: theory and implementation

    Kevin D. Bowers;Ari Juels;Alina Oprea

  • RFID privacy: an overview of problems and proposed solutions

    S.L. Garfinkel;A. Juels;R. Pappu

  • Town Crier: An Authenticated Data Feed for Smart Contracts.

    Fan Zhang;Ethan Cecchetti;Kyle Croman;Ari Juels

  • Minimalist Cryptography for Low-Cost RFID Tags.

    Ari Juels

  • Squealing Euros: Privacy Protection in RFID-Enabled Banknotes

    Ari Juels;Ravikanth Pappu

  • Universal Re-encryption for Mixnets

    Philippe Golle;Markus Jakobsson;Ari Juels;Paul F. Syverson

  • Making Mix Nets Robust For Electronic Voting By Randomized Partial Checking.

    Markus Jakobsson;Ari Juels;Ronald L. Rivest

  • Defining strong privacy for RFID

    Ari Juels;Stephen A. Weis

  • HomeAlone: Co-residency Detection in the Cloud via Side-Channel Analysis

    Yinqian Zhang;Ari Juels;Alina Oprea;Michael K. Reiter

  • Coercion-resistant electronic elections

    Ari Juels;Dario Catalano;Markus Jakobsson

Frequent Co-Authors

Alina Oprea
Alina Oprea Northeastern University
Marten van Dijk
Marten van Dijk University of Connecticut
Thomas Ristenpart
Thomas Ristenpart Cornell University
Elaine Shi
Elaine Shi Carnegie Mellon University
Andrew Miller
Andrew Miller University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Burton S. Kaliski
Burton S. Kaliski Verisign Inc.
Bryan Parno
Bryan Parno Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options in the USA can open doors to diverse career pathways in computer science and beyond. One key advantage is flexibility—students can balance studies with work or family commitments, making online degrees an excellent choice for many.

Cost and program length are important considerations. Those seeking advanced qualifications might consider affordable phd programs or accelerated doctoral programs in education online to achieve their goals without the burden of high tuition fees or extended study timelines.

For students aiming to quickly enhance their credentials, a 6 month degree course can provide a fast-track into the workforce or further education. Meanwhile, those interested in combining technical skills with business knowledge might explore the best online business management degree programs to boost leadership potential.

By considering factors like affordability, speed, and career alignment, students can select the online path that best fits their ambitions in the field of computer science or related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Ari Juels

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles