World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
24259
World Ranking
3952
National Ranking
1878

Giuseppe Ateniese publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giuseppe Ateniese sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 143 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Giuseppe Ateniese D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giuseppe Ateniese sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Giuseppe Ateniese is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States and specializes in computer science with a focus on cryptography and data security. Their research encompasses several key areas including user authentication and security systems, advanced malware detection techniques, privacy-preserving technologies in data, internet traffic analysis and secure e-voting, blockchain technology applications and security, and cloud data security solutions.

The scientist's publication record includes a range of recent papers, highlighting work across various security and cryptographic topics. Notable papers include:

  • "Eluding Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning via Model Inconsistency," 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
  • "Improving password guessing via representation learning," 2021, Padua Research Archive (University of Padua)
  • "Match Me if You Can: Matchmaking Encryption and Its Applications," 2021, Journal of Cryptology
  • "Audita: A blockchain-based auditing framework for off-chain storage," 2021, IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)
  • "Subversion-resilient signatures: Definitions, constructions and applications," 2020, IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative work include:

  • Danilo Francati
  • Dario Pasquini
  • Daniele Venturi
  • Massimo Bernaschi
  • Bernardo Magri

The scholar's publications are often found in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)
  • Lecture notes in computer science
  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security

Ateniese's primary fields of study include computer science with multiple subfields represented in their publications:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Signal Processing
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics

Best Publications

  • Provable Data Possession at Untrusted Stores.

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Randal C. Burns;Reza Curtmola;Joseph Herring

  • Scalable and Efficient Provable Data Possession.

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Roberto Di Pietro;Luigi V. Mancini;Gene Tsudik

  • Improved proxy re-encryption schemes with applications to secure distributed storage

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Kevin Fu;Matthew Green;Susan Hohenberger

  • Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learning

    Briland Hitaj;Giuseppe Ateniese;Fernando Perez-Cruz

  • A Practical and Provably Secure Coalition-Resistant Group Signature Scheme

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Jan Camenisch;Marc Joye;Gene Tsudik

  • Identity-Based Proxy Re-encryption

    Matthew Green;Giuseppe Ateniese

  • Visual Cryptography for General Access Structures

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Carlo Blundo;Alfredo De Santis;Douglas R. Stinson

  • MR-PDP: Multiple-Replica Provable Data Possession

    R. Curtmola;O. Khan;R. Burns;G. Ateniese

  • Extended capabilities for visual cryptography

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Carlo Blundo;Alfredo De Santis;Douglas R. Stinson

  • VABKS: Verifiable attribute-based keyword search over outsourced encrypted data

    Qingji Zheng;Shouhuai Xu;Giuseppe Ateniese

  • Remote data checking using provable data possession

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Randal Burns;Reza Curtmola;Joseph Herring

  • New multiparty authentication services and key agreement protocols

    G. Ateniese;M. Steiner;G. Tsudik

  • Proofs of Storage from Homomorphic Identification Protocols

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Seny Kamara;Jonathan Katz

  • Identity-Based Remote Data Integrity Checking With Perfect Data Privacy Preserving for Cloud Storage

    Yong Yu;Man Ho Au;Giuseppe Ateniese;Xinyi Huang

  • Redactable Blockchain – or – Rewriting History in Bitcoin and Friends

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Bernardo Magri;Daniele Venturi;Ewerton Andrade

  • Hacking smart machines with smarter ones: How to extract meaningful data from machine learning classifiers

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Luigi V. Mancini;Angelo Spognardi;Antonio Villani

  • Sanitizable signatures

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Daniel H. Chou;Breno de Medeiros;Gene Tsudik

  • Quasi-efficient revocation of group signatures

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Dawn Song;Gene Tsudik

  • Some Open Issues and New Directions in Group Signatures

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Gene Tsudik

  • Remote data checking for network coding-based distributed storage systems

    Bo Chen;Reza Curtmola;Giuseppe Ateniese;Randal Burns

Frequent Co-Authors

Gene Tsudik
Gene Tsudik University of California, Irvine
Susan Hohenberger
Susan Hohenberger Johns Hopkins University
Randal Burns
Randal Burns Johns Hopkins University
Alfredo De Santis
Alfredo De Santis University of Salerno
Dawn Song
Dawn Song University of California, Berkeley
Matthew Green
Matthew Green Johns Hopkins University
Chiara Petrioli
Chiara Petrioli Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science often leads to a wide range of degree and career options, especially with the growth of online education. For those wanting to advance their expertise, affordable doctoral programs offer a way to earn a PhD or EdD without the financial burden of traditional options. These programs are ideal for future researchers, educators, or professionals seeking leadership roles.

Looking to fast-track your credentials? You might consider easiest edd programs or a degree in 6 months online to quickly bolster your resume. These paths are especially popular for career changers or those needing qualifications in a short timeframe.

Many computer science professionals also benefit from business skills. Earning a degree from business schools online is a flexible way to learn management, entrepreneurship, and other in-demand skills that pair well with technical knowledge. Whichever path you choose, online education makes it easier than ever to build a successful career in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Giuseppe Ateniese

Trending Scientists