World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 44 5837 5629 1636 1518 229 7170

Domenic Forte publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Domenic Forte between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Domenic Forte published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 19.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2017. 41 of the 297 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2017. 2011: 6 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 45 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 35 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 19 publications
2011 2025

297 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Domenic Forte: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 6
2012 2
2013 7
2014 12
2015 24
2016 25
2017 45
2018 16
2019 35
2020 22
2021 23
2022 20
2023 19
2024 22
2025 19
Total 297
Download as CSV

Domenic Forte publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Domenic Forte sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 228–237 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 229 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321 229
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Domenic Forte D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Domenic Forte sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310 44
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Domenic Forte is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States and has an extensive publication record in computer science and engineering, particularly focusing on hardware security and related fields. Their work spans multiple subfields such as electrical and electronic engineering, hardware and architecture, artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, and signal processing.

The main topics of Domenic Forte's research include:

  • Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques

Frequent co-authors in Domenic Forte's collaborations are:

  • Fatemeh Ganji
  • Damon L. Woodard
  • Mark Tehranipoor
  • Rabin Yu Acharya
  • David S. Koblah

Common publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems
  • Journal of Hardware and Systems Security
  • ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems
  • Proceedings - International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis

Examples of recent relevant publications by Domenic Forte are:

  • Hardware Trust and Assurance through Reverse Engineering: A Tutorial and Outlook from Image Analysis and Machine Learning Perspectives, 2021, ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems
  • Security Assessment of Dynamically Obfuscated Scan Chain Against Oracle-guided Attacks, 2021, ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems
  • ECG Biometric: Spoofing and Countermeasures, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biometrics Behavior and Identity Science
  • SCRIPT, 2020, ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems
  • Physical security in the post-quantum era, 2021, Journal of Cryptographic Engineering

Domenic Forte's research integrates methodologies from artificial intelligence and machine learning to address challenges in hardware trust, security, and verification. The work also addresses biometric spoofing and post-quantum physical security issues, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach involving both theoretical and applied aspects of computer and electronic engineering.

Best Publications

  • Hardware Trojans: Lessons Learned after One Decade of Research

    K. Xiao;D. Forte;Y. Jin;R. Karri

  • Benchmarking of Hardware Trojans and Maliciously Affected Circuits

    Bicky Shakya;Tony He;Hassan Salmani;Domenic Forte

  • A Survey on Chip to System Reverse Engineering

    Shahed E. Quadir;Junlin Chen;Domenic Forte;Navid Asadizanjani

  • Novel Bypass Attack and BDD-based Tradeoff Analysis Against All Known Logic Locking Attacks

    Xiaolin Xu;Bicky Shakya;Mark M. Tehranipoor;Domenic Forte

  • Counterfeit Integrated Circuits

    Mark (Mohammad) Tehranipoor;Ujjwal Guin;Domenic Forte

  • On Reverse Engineering-Based Hardware Trojan Detection

    Chongxi Bao;Domenic Forte;Ankur Srivastava

  • On application of one-class SVM to reverse engineering-based hardware Trojan detection

    Chongxi Bao;Domenic Forte;Ankur Srivastava

  • An Aging-Resistant RO-PUF for Reliable Key Generation

    Md. Tauhidur Rahman;Fahim Rahman;Domenic Forte;Mark Tehranipoor

  • Hardware Trojans

    Unknown

  • Temperature tracking: an innovative run-time approach for hardware Trojan detection

    Domenic Forte;Chongxi Bao;Ankur Srivastava

  • Bit selection algorithm suitable for high-volume production of SRAM-PUF

    Kan Xiao;Md. Tauhidur Rahman;Domenic Forte;Yu Huang

  • AVFSM: a framework for identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities in FSMs

    Adib Nahiyan;Kan Xiao;Kun Yang;Yeir Jin

  • Highly Reliable Key Generation From Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    Nima Karimian;Zimu Guo;Mark Tehranipoor;Domenic Forte

  • Anti-counterfeit Techniques: From Design to Resign

    Ujjwal Guin;Domenic Forte;Mohammad Tehranipoor

  • A Novel Built-In Self-Authentication Technique to Prevent Inserting Hardware Trojans

    Kan Xiao;Domenic Forte;Mohammed Tehranipoor

  • Memristor PUF—A Security Primitive: Theory and Experiment

    Anas Mazady;Tauhidur Rahman;Domenic Forte;Mehdi Anwar

  • ARO-PUF: an aging-resistant ring oscillator PUF design

    Tauhidur Rahman;Domenic Forte;Jim Fahrny;Mohammad Tehranipoor

  • Temperature Tracking: Toward Robust Run-Time Detection of Hardware Trojans

    Chongxi Bao;Domenic Forte;Ankur Srivastava

  • Counterfeit Integrated Circuits: Detection and Avoidance

    Mark Mohammad Tehranipoor;Ujjwal Guin;Domenic Forte

  • Probing Attacks on Integrated Circuits: Challenges and Research Opportunities

    Huanyu Wang;Domenic Forte;Mark M. Tehranipoor;Qihang Shi

  • Efficient and secure split manufacturing via obfuscated built-in self-authentication

    Kan Xiao;Domenic Forte;Mark Mohammed Tehranipoor

  • Low-cost On-Chip Structures for Combating Die and IC Recycling

    Ujjwal Guin;Xuehui Zhang;Domenic Forte;Mohammad Tehranipoor

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Tehranipoor
Mark Tehranipoor University of Florida
Swarup Bhunia
Swarup Bhunia University of Florida
Ankur Srivastava
Ankur Srivastava University of Maryland, College Park
Mohammad Tehranipoor
Mohammad Tehranipoor University of Florida
Jean-Pierre Seifert
Jean-Pierre Seifert Technical University of Berlin
Yier Jin
Yier Jin University of Florida
Rajat Subhra Chakraborty
Rajat Subhra Chakraborty Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Ramesh Karri
Ramesh Karri New York University
Garrett S. Rose
Garrett S. Rose University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Yu Huang
Yu Huang University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Engineering and Technology studies in the USA is more flexible than ever, thanks to the expanding range of online programs. Many students—especially those balancing work, family, or other commitments—are turning to online degrees for stay at home moms. These programs offer adaptable schedules, making higher education more accessible for students from all walks of life.

Fast-tracking your education is also possible through 6 week college courses online, allowing learners to acquire knowledge and credentials in a fraction of the usual time. For those interested in merging technology with business, there are specialized programs such as online finance degrees and the increasingly popular 18 month mba programs. These options enable ambitious students to expand their skill sets and accelerate their career pathways.

Whether you are aiming for a technology-driven job or seeking to enhance your business acumen, flexible online degree pathways now make it easier to achieve your academic and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Domenic Forte

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles