World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
7820
World Ranking
8783
National Ranking
243

Fabio Pianesi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabio Pianesi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 166 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Fabio Pianesi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabio Pianesi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fabio Pianesi is affiliated with the Fondazione Bruno Kessler in Italy and conducts research in psychology, arts and humanities, and related interdisciplinary fields. Their research output encompasses topics such as language development and disorders, communication strategies, and cognition, with a focus on developmental and experimental approaches.

Their recent publications include:

  • A developmental study of expressing simultaneous events in film-based narratives, 2021, First Language
  • Causal Relations and Cohesive Strategies in the Narratives of Heritage Speakers of Russian in Their Two Languages, 2024, Languages
  • Causal, Spatial, and Temporal Cohesion in German and Hebrew Picture-Based Narratives: A Form-Function Developmental Study, 2024, SSRN Electronic Journal

The main fields of study associated with Fabio Pianesi are psychology and arts and humanities, with a particular emphasis on developmental and educational psychology as well as experimental and cognitive psychology. Linguistics form part of the broader area of research interests.

Subfields of focus include:

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Automotive Engineering

The topics covered in their scientific work include:

  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Categorization, perception, and language
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Child and Animal Learning Development

Fabio Pianesi frequently collaborates with several coauthors in their research activities. Among these frequent collaborators are:

  • Elena Nicoladis
  • Sveta Fichman
  • Sharon Armon-Lotem
  • Dagmar Bittner
  • Anne-Katharina Harr

Publication venues where Fabio Pianesi's work has appeared include:

  • First Language
  • Languages
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax

    Alessandra Giorgi;Fabio Pianesi

  • Once Upon a Crime: Towards Crime Prediction from Demographics and Mobile Data

    Andrey Bogomolov;Bruno Lepri;Jacopo Staiano;Nuria Oliver

  • Useful, Social and Enjoyable: Mobile Phone Adoption by Older People

    Mario Conci;Fabio Pianesi;Massimo Zancanaro

  • Friends don't lie: inferring personality traits from social network structure

    Jacopo Staiano;Bruno Lepri;Nadav Aharony;Fabio Pianesi

  • User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization

    Geert-Jan Houben;Gord McCalla;Fabio Pianesi;Massimo Zancanaro

  • Multimodal recognition of personality traits in social interactions

    Fabio Pianesi;Nadia Mana;Alessandro Cappelletti;Bruno Lepri

  • Daily Stress Recognition from Mobile Phone Data, Weather Conditions and Individual Traits

    Andrey Bogomolov;Bruno Lepri;Michela Ferron;Fabio Pianesi

  • Daily Stress Recognition from Mobile Phone Data, Weather Conditions and Individual Traits

    Andrey Bogomolov;Bruno Lepri;Michela Ferron;Fabio Pianesi

  • Enhancing social communication of children with high-functioning autism through a co-located interface

    Eynat Gal;Nirit Bauminger;Dina Goren-Bar;Fabio Pianesi

  • Building the Italian Syntactic-Semantic Treebank

    Simonetta Montemagni;Francesco Barsotti;Marco Battista;Nicoletta Calzolari

  • Computers in the Human Interaction Loop

    Unknown

  • Collaborative Puzzle Game: a tabletop interactive game for fostering collaboration in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD)

    A. Battocchi;F. Pianesi;D. Tomasini;M. Zancanaro

  • Using the influence model to recognize functional roles in meetings

    Wen Dong;Bruno Lepri;Alessandro Cappelletti;Alex Sandy Pentland

  • Automatic detection of group functional roles in face to face interactions

    Massimo Zancanaro;Bruno Lepri;Fabio Pianesi

  • Please, tell me about yourself: automatic personality assessment using short self-presentations

    Ligia Maria Batrinca;Nadia Mana;Bruno Lepri;Fabio Pianesi

  • Moves on the Street: Classifying Crime Hotspots Using Aggregated Anonymized Data on People Dynamics

    Andrey Bogomolov;Bruno Lepri;Jacopo Staiano;Emmanuel Letouzé

  • Connecting Meeting Behavior with Extraversion—A Systematic Study

    B. Lepri;R. Subramanian;K. Kalimeri;J. Staiano

  • Collaborative puzzle game: a tabletop interface for fostering collaborative skills in children with autism spectrum disorders

    Alberto Battocchi;Ayelet Ben‐Sasson;Gianluca Esposito;Eynat Gal

  • Enhancing the usability and performance of NESPOLE!: a real-world speech-to-speech translation system

    Alon Lavie;Florian Metze;Fabio Pianesi

  • Happiness Recognition from Mobile Phone Data

    Andrey Bogomolov;Bruno Lepri;Fabio Pianesi

  • An exploratory study of a touch-based gestural interface for elderly

    Chiara Leonardi;Adriano Albertini;Fabio Pianesi;Massimo Zancanaro

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruno Lepri
Bruno Lepri Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Massimo Zancanaro
Massimo Zancanaro University of Trento
Oliviero Stock
Oliviero Stock Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Nicu Sebe
Nicu Sebe University of Trento
Nuria Oliver
Nuria Oliver European Laboratory for Learning and Intelligent Systems
Alon Lavie
Alon Lavie Carnegie Mellon University
Iyad Rahwan
Iyad Rahwan Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Stan Matwin
Stan Matwin Dalhousie University
Paola Venuti
Paola Venuti University of Trento

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA can open doors to several diverse fields. Many students find value in related programs that build complementary skills, often through affordable and flexible online options.

For those interested in law enforcement technology or cybersecurity, pursuing a criminal justice major can provide valuable insight into the intersection of justice and technology.

Analytical thinkers with a knack for numbers may consider the best online accounting degree, which equips students with data analysis and problem-solving skills essential to business technology roles.

With the explosion of big data, professionals with a background in computer science may want to explore top data science programs online, focusing on advanced analytics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.

For those who prefer technology’s integration with infrastructure and project management, the online construction management program offers a blend of technical and leadership skills relevant to the modern, digital-driven construction industry.

Best Scientists Citing Fabio Pianesi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles