World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
62
Citations
14495
World Ranking
2916
National Ranking
170

Anthony Finkelstein publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Finkelstein sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 321 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Anthony Finkelstein D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Finkelstein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Anthony Finkelstein is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research activity spans several fields within Computer Science, focusing particularly on Information Systems, Modeling and Simulation, and Epidemiology, alongside work related to Clinical Psychology and Political Science and International Relations.

Their work frequently addresses topics including:

  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
  • Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • E-Government and Public Services
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Several recent papers authored or coauthored by Anthony Finkelstein illustrate the research focus and collaboration network. These include:

  • "OpenABM-Covid19-An agent-based model for non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 including contact tracing," published in 2021 in PLoS Computational Biology
  • "OpenABM-Covid19 - an agent-based model for non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 including contact tracing," published in 2020 in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Data as Infrastructure for Smart Cities: Linking Data Platforms to Business Strategies," published in 2020 in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Issue Information," published in 2023 in X-Ray Spectrometry
  • "Hoarding disorder, therapeutic jurisprudence and residential tenancy law: A complex relationship and opportunities for reform," published in 2025 in International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Anthony Finkelstein include:

  • Robert Hinch
  • William J. M. Probert
  • Anel Nurtay
  • Michelle Kendall
  • Chris Wymant

The scientist has published in several academic venues, including:

  • PLoS Computational Biology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • X-Ray Spectrometry
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

In recognition of their contributions, Anthony Finkelstein was named a Member of Academia Europaea in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: A Research Roadmap

    Betty H. Cheng;Rogério Lemos;Holger Giese;Paola Inverardi

  • VIEWPOINTS: A FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATING MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES IN SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT

    Anthony Finkelstein;Jeff Kramer;Bashar Nuseibeh;L. Finkelstein

  • A framework for expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specification

    B. Nuseibeh;J. Kramer;A. Finkelstein

  • Inconsistency handling in multiperspective specifications

    A.C.W. Finkelstein;D. Gabbay;A. Hunter;J. Kramer

  • A sense of community: A research agenda for software ecosystems

    Slinger Jansen;Anthony Finkelstein;Sjaak Brinkkemper

  • Stakeholder identification in the requirements engineering process

    H. Sharp;A. Finkelstein;G. Galal

  • Requirements-Aware Systems: A Research Agenda for RE for Self-adaptive Systems

    Pete Sawyer;Nelly Bencomo;Jon Whittle;Emmanuel Letier

  • xlinkit: a consistency checking and smart link generation service

    Christian Nentwich;Licia Capra;Wolfgang Emmerich;Anthony Finkelsteiin

  • A comedy of errors: the London Ambulance Service case study

    A. Finkelstein;J. Dowell

  • StakeRare: Using Social Networks and Collaborative Filtering for Large-Scale Requirements Elicitation

    Soo Ling Lim;A. Finkelstein

  • Consistency management with repair actions

    Christian Nentwich;Wolfgang Emmerich;Anthony Finkelsteiin

  • Business Network Management as a Survival Strategy: A Tale of Two Software Ecosystems

    Slinger Jansen;Sjaak Brinkkemper;Anthony Finkelstein

  • Flexible consistency checking

    Christian Nentwich;Wolfgang Emmerich;Anthony Finkelsteiin;Ernst Ellmer

  • Requirements reflection: requirements as runtime entities

    Nelly Bencomo;Jon Whittle;Pete Sawyer;Anthony Finkelstein

  • ViewPoint Oriented Software Development

    A. Finkelstein;J. Kramer;M. Goedicke

  • OpenABM-Covid19-An agent-based model for non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 including contact tracing.

    Robert Hinch;William J. M. Probert;Anel Nurtay;Michelle Kendall;Michelle Kendall

  • StakeNet: using social networks to analyse the stakeholders of large-scale software projects

    Soo Ling Lim;Daniele Quercia;Anthony Finkelstein

  • The viewpoints FAQ

    A Finkelstein;I Sommerville

  • COORDINATING DISTRIBUTED VIEWPOINTS - THE ANATOMY OF A CONSISTENCY CHECK

    Steve Easterbrook;Anthony Finkelstein;Jeff Kramer;Bashar Nuseibeh

  • Generating and Evaluating Choices for Fixing Inconsistencies in UML Design Models

    A. Egyed;E. Letier;A. Finkelstein

  • OpenABM-Covid19 - an agent-based model for non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 including contact tracing

    Robert Hinch;William J M Probert;Anel Nurtay;Michelle Kendall

  • An Analysis of the Requirements Traceability Problem

    O Gotel;A Finkelstein

  • Inconsistency handling in multi-perspective specifications

    A Finkelstein;D Gabbay;A Hunter;J Kramer

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeff Kramer
Jeff Kramer Imperial College London
Bashar Nuseibeh
Bashar Nuseibeh The Open University
Wolfgang Emmerich
Wolfgang Emmerich University College London
Mark Harman
Mark Harman University College London
Nelly Bencomo
Nelly Bencomo Durham University
Jon Whittle
Jon Whittle Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Slinger Jansen
Slinger Jansen Utrecht University
Sjaak Brinkkemper
Sjaak Brinkkemper Utrecht University
Pete Sawyer
Pete Sawyer Aston University
Steve Easterbrook
Steve Easterbrook University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of flexible career opportunities and educational options. For those seeking efficient paths to employment, exploring short degrees that pay well can be a smart move. These programs often focus on in-demand tech skills and can help you enter the workforce faster.

Specialized fields like artificial intelligence are also growing rapidly. Choosing an online degree from one of the ai degrees can help you position yourself for rewarding roles in emerging industries, often with flexible learning schedules.

If you're undecided about your major, it’s worth reviewing the top 10 best majors for the future. Many of these fields overlap with computer science and offer strong job prospects and salary potential.

For graduates seeking to advance their careers further, considering what is the easiest masters degree can help you balance career growth with life commitments. Whether you want to specialize or broaden your skill set, multiple pathways are available in the tech sector.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony Finkelstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles