World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
46172
World Ranking
9943
National Ranking
4350

Andrew J. Gentles publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Gentles sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 243 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Andrew J. Gentles D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Gentles sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew J. Gentles is a researcher affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields of study, primarily focusing on medicine, biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, as well as immunology and microbiology. Within these broader areas, their research delves into several subfields, including immunology, molecular biology, oncology, cancer research, and hematology.

Their recent scholarly contributions include papers published in high-impact journals. Notable publications are:

  • Transient rest restores functionality in exhausted CAR-T cells through epigenetic remodeling, 2021, Science
  • Lymph node colonization induces tumor-immune tolerance to promote distant metastasis, 2022, Cell
  • CRISPR screens in cancer spheroids identify 3D growth-specific vulnerabilities, 2020, Nature
  • Atlas of clinically distinct cell states and ecosystems across human solid tumors, 2021, Cell
  • The landscape of tumor cell states and ecosystems in diffuse large B cell lymphoma, 2021, Cancer Cell

Andrew J. Gentles' research topics cover diverse areas related to cancer and immunology. Key topics of their work include:

  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers
  • Cancer genomics and diagnostics
  • Immunotherapy and immune responses
  • Immune cell function and interaction
  • T-cell and B-cell immunology

They have collaborated frequently with several coauthors, indicating strong research partnerships in their field. Regular collaborators include Aaron M. Newman, Bogdan Luca, John B. Sunwoo, Sylvia K. Plevritis, and Ravindra Majeti.

Andrew J. Gentles has published extensively across several scientific venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research
  • Blood
  • Cell Reports
  • Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles

    Aaron M. Newman;Chih Long Liu;Michael R. Green;Andrew J. Gentles

  • The Immune Landscape of Cancer

    Vésteinn Thorsson;David L Gibbs;Scott D Brown;Denise Wolf

  • Determining cell type abundance and expression from bulk tissues with digital cytometry.

    Aaron M. Newman;Chloé B. Steen;Chloé B. Steen;Chih Long Liu;Andrew J. Gentles

  • The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers

    Andrew J Gentles;Aaron M Newman;Chih Long Liu;Scott V Bratman;Scott V Bratman

  • Machine Learning Identifies Stemness Features Associated with Oncogenic Dedifferentiation

    Tathiane M Malta;Artem Sokolov;Andrew J Gentles;Tomasz Burzykowski

  • The CD47-signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPa) interaction is a therapeutic target for human solid tumors

    Stephen B. Willingham;Jens Peter Volkmer;Andrew J. Gentles;Debashis Sahoo

  • Annotation, submission and screening of repetitive elements in Repbase: RepbaseSubmitter and Censor

    Oleksiy Kohany;Andrew J Gentles;Lukasz Hankus;Jerzy Jurka

  • Genome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non-coding sequences

    Tarjei S. Mikkelsen;Tarjei S. Mikkelsen;Matthew J. Wakefield;Bronwen Aken;Chris T. Amemiya

  • Calreticulin Is the Dominant Pro-Phagocytic Signal on Multiple Human Cancers and Is Counterbalanced by CD47

    Mark P. Chao;Siddhartha Jaiswal;Siddhartha Jaiswal;Rachel Weissman-Tsukamoto;Ash A. Alizadeh

  • Transient rest restores functionality in exhausted CAR-T cells through epigenetic remodeling.

    Evan W. Weber;Kevin R. Parker;Elena Sotillo;Rachel C. Lynn

  • Association of a leukemic stem cell gene expression signature with clinical outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia.

    Andrew J. Gentles;Sylvia K. Plevritis;Ravindra Majeti;Ash A. Alizadeh

  • A Simple Method for Estimating Interactions Between a Treatment and a Large Number of Covariates

    Lu Tian;Ash A. Alizadeh;Andrew J. Gentles;Robert Tibshirani

  • Mutations in early follicular lymphoma progenitors are associated with suppressed antigen presentation

    Michael R. Green;Shingo Kihira;Chih Long Liu;Ramesh V. Nair

  • Hierarchy in somatic mutations arising during genomic evolution and progression of follicular lymphoma.

    Michael R. Green;Andrew J. Gentles;Ramesh V. Nair;Jonathan M. Irish;Jonathan M. Irish

  • Prospective separation of normal and leukemic stem cells based on differential expression of TIM3, a human acute myeloid leukemia stem cell marker

    Max Jan;Mark P. Chao;Adriel C. Cha;Ash A. Alizadeh

  • Role of KEAP1/NRF2 and TP53 Mutations in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Development and Radiation Resistance

    Youngtae Jeong;Ngoc T. Hoang;Ngoc T. Hoang;Alexander Lovejoy;Henning Stehr

  • Amino acid runs in eukaryotic proteomes and disease associations

    Samuel Karlin;Luciano Brocchieri;Aviv Bergman;Jan Mrázek

  • CRISPR screens in cancer spheroids identify 3D growth-specific vulnerabilities.

    Kyuho Han;Sarah E. Pierce;Amy Li;Kaitlyn Spees

  • A pluripotency signature predicts histologic transformation and influences survival in follicular lymphoma patients

    Andrew J. Gentles;Ash A. Alizadeh;Su In Lee;June Helen Myklebust

  • Abstract PR09: The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers

    Andrew J. Gentles;Aaron M. Newman;Chih Long Liu;Scott V. Bratman

Frequent Co-Authors

Ash A. Alizadeh
Ash A. Alizadeh Stanford University
Maximilian Diehn
Maximilian Diehn Stanford University
Chih Long Liu
Chih Long Liu Stanford University
Yasodha Natkunam
Yasodha Natkunam Stanford University
Ronald Levy
Ronald Levy Stanford University
Jerzy Jurka
Jerzy Jurka Genetic Information Research Institute
Robert B. West
Robert B. West Stanford University
Ranjana H. Advani
Ranjana H. Advani Stanford University
Samuel Karlin
Samuel Karlin Stanford University
Houtan Noushmehr
Houtan Noushmehr Henry Ford Health System

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a wide range of specialized online degrees and in-demand career options. For those drawn to mental health, psychiatric np programs provide a pathway to advanced clinical roles focused on mental wellness. If nutrition and dietetics are of interest, consider accelerated dietitian programs that allow you to enter the workforce faster in areas like clinical nutrition, wellness coaching, or food research.

Ambitious students interested in the business side of healthcare can benefit from pursuing a cheap online mba healthcare administration. This degree equips graduates with leadership, management, and strategic planning skills needed in hospital administration or biotech firms.

For those exploring medical coding and data management, it is important to consider the differences between ccs vs cpc certification, as each path impacts job roles and earning potential in the healthcare industry. Overall, an education in Biology and Biochemistry offers a springboard to many promising and rewarding online career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew J. Gentles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles