World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
14911
World Ranking
4242
National Ranking
1999

Craig Chambers publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig Chambers sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 105 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Craig Chambers D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig Chambers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Craig Chambers is currently affiliated with Google in the United States. Their academic contributions include research published in the literary journal Prairie schooner.

Their recent published work includes the paper titled Goddamn Southern Indiana, which was published in 2022 in Prairie schooner.

  • Goddamn Southern Indiana, 2022, Prairie schooner

Chambers has no frequent co-authors listed in the available data.

  • Prairie schooner (1 publication)

No formal information about book publications, specific fields of study, subfields, or main research topics is provided in the available data. There are also no recorded awards associated with their academic profile at this time.

Best Publications

  • Extensibility safety and performance in the SPIN operating system

    B. N. Bershad;S. Savage;P. Pardyak;E. G. Sirer

  • Optimization of Object-Oriented Programs Using Static Class Hierarchy Analysis.

    Dean J;Grove D;Chambers C

  • ArchJava: connecting software architecture to implementation

    Jonathan Aldrich;Craig Chambers;David Notkin

  • The Dataflow Model: A Practical Approach to Balancing Correctness, Latency, and Cost in Massive-Scale, Unbounded, Out-of-Order Data Processing

    Unknown

  • Optimizing Dynamically-Typed Object-Oriented Languages With Polymorphic Inline Caches

    Urs Hölzle;Craig Chambers;David Ungar

  • Call graph construction in object-oriented languages

    David Grove;Greg DeFouw;Jeffrey Dean;Craig Chambers

  • FlumeJava: easy, efficient data-parallel pipelines

    Unknown

  • An efficient implementation of SELF a dynamically-typed object-oriented language based on prototypes

    C. Chambers;D. Ungar;E. Lee

  • MultiJava: modular open classes and symmetric multiple dispatch for Java

    Curtis Clifton;Gary T. Leavens;Craig Chambers;Todd Millstein

  • Debugging optimized code with dynamic deoptimization

    Urs Hölzle;Craig Chambers;David Ungar

  • Object-Oriented Multi-Methods in Cecil

    Craig Chambers

  • A framework for call graph construction algorithms

    David Grove;Craig Chambers

  • Alias annotations for program understanding

    Jonathan Aldrich;Valentin Kostadinov;Craig Chambers

  • Fast, effective dynamic compilation

    Joel Auslander;Matthai Philipose;Craig Chambers;Susan J. Eggers

  • SPIN: an extensible microkernel for application-specific operating system services

    Brian N. Bershad;Craig Chambers;Susan Eggers;Chris Maeda

  • SPIN—an extensible microkernel for application-specific operating system services

    Brian N. Bershad;Craig Chambers;Susan Eggers;Chris Maeda

  • Ownership Domains: Separating Aliasing Policy from Mechanism

    Jonathan Aldrich;Craig Chambers

  • Making pure object-oriented languages practical

    Craig Chambers;David Ungar

  • System and method for performing selective dynamic compilation using run-time information

    Craig Chambers;Susan J. Eggers;Brian K. Grant;Markus Mock

  • Customization: optimizing compiler technology for SELF, a dynamically-typed object-oriented programming language

    C. Chambers;D. Ungar

  • DyC: an expressive annotation-directed dynamic compiler for C

    Brian Grant;Markus Mock;Matthai Philipose;Craig Chambers

  • Predicate dispatching : A unified theory of dispatch

    M. Ernst;C. Kaplan;C. Chambers

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan J. Eggers
Susan J. Eggers University of Washington
David Ungar
David Ungar Apple (United States)
David Grove
David Grove IBM (United States)
Todd Millstein
Todd Millstein University of California, Los Angeles
Matthai Philipose
Matthai Philipose Microsoft (United States)
Jonathan Aldrich
Jonathan Aldrich Carnegie Mellon University
Gary T. Leavens
Gary T. Leavens University of Central Florida
Emin Gün Sirer
Emin Gün Sirer Cornell University
David Notkin
David Notkin University of Washington
Urs Hölzle
Urs Hölzle Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to numerous online degrees and career routes. Many students are now considering interdisciplinary fields and allied subjects to expand their expertise and job prospects. For example, choosing the best online physics degree can deepen your understanding of foundational scientific concepts critical to computing innovation.

Technology careers often require specialized credentials. For those interested in big data and AI, seeking out the cheapest data science degree can make advanced training accessible without the burden of excessive student debt.

For students with a knack for hardware, there are many accredited online electrical engineering programs that compliment computing skills and boost employability in industries like robotics and telecommunications.

Lastly, if you’re looking for a quicker way into the tech workforce, consider pursuing easy licenses and certifications to get. These credentials can be a smart, efficient stepping stone towards rewarding roles in IT and computer-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Craig Chambers

Recently Published Articles