World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
48
Citations
12167
World Ranking
1191
National Ranking
62

Thomas Kneib publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Kneib sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 276 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Thomas Kneib D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Kneib sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Kneib is a researcher affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany. The primary field of study is Mathematics, with a focus on Statistics and Probability as a major subfield. Their work extends into related subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, and Environmental Engineering.

The main research topics covered by their publications include:

  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Thomas Kneib has authored a number of influential papers, which include:

  • Rage Against the Mean - A Review of Distributional Regression Approaches (2021, Econometrics and Statistics)

While Kneib is the sole author listed on the paper above, their frequent coauthors include:

  • Nadja Klein
  • Benjamin Säfken
  • Christoph Weisser
  • Paul Wiemann
  • Anton Thielmann

Their research outputs have been published in various venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Statistical Modelling
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Statistics and Computing
  • Biometrical Journal

Thomas Kneib has contributed to book literature as well. A recent publication is:

  • Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape (2024, Cambridge University Press)

Best Publications

  • Conditional variable importance for random forests

    Carolin Strobl;Anne Laure Boulesteix;Thomas Kneib;Thomas Augustin

  • Regression: Models, Methods and Applications

    Ludwig Fahrmeir;Thomas Kneib;Stefan Lang;Brian Marx

  • PENALIZED STRUCTURED ADDITIVE REGRESSION FOR SPACE-TIME DATA: A BAYESIAN PERSPECTIVE

    Ludwig Fahrmeir;Thomas Kneib;Stefan Lang

  • On the behaviour of marginal and conditional AIC in linear mixed models

    Sonja Greven;Thomas Kneib

  • BayesX: analysing Bayesian structured additive regression models

    Andreas Brezger;Thomas Kneib;Stefan Lang

  • Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape for high dimensional data—a flexible approach based on boosting

    Andreas Mayr;Nora Fenske;Benjamin Hofner;Thomas Kneib

  • Regression - Modelle, Methoden und Anwendungen

    Ludwig Fahrmeir;Thomas Kneib;Stefan Lang

  • Identifying Risk Factors for Severe Childhood Malnutrition by Boosting Additive Quantile Regression

    Nora Fenske;Thomas Kneib;Torsten Hothorn

  • Model-based Boosting 2.0

    Torsten Hothorn;Peter Bühlmann;Thomas Kneib;Matthias Schmid

  • Beyond mean regression

    Thomas Kneib

  • Bayesian Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape for Zero-Inflated and Overdispersed Count Data

    Nadja Klein;Thomas Kneib;Stefan Lang

  • Variable Selection and Model Choice in Geoadditive Regression Models

    Thomas Kneib;Torsten Hothorn;Gerhard Tutz

  • Expectile and quantile regression—David and Goliath?

    Linda Schulze Waltrup;Fabian Sobotka;Thomas Kneib;Göran Kauermann

  • Bayesian Smoothing and Regression for Longitudinal, Spatial and Event History Data

    Ludwig Fahrmeir;Thomas Kneib

  • Geoadditive expectile regression

    Fabian Sobotka;Thomas Kneib

  • Bayesian structured additive distributional regression with an application to regional income inequality in Germany

    Nadja Klein;Thomas Kneib;Stefan Lang;Alexander Sohn

  • Structured Additive Regression Models: An R Interface to BayesX

    Nikolaus Umlauf;Daniel Adler;Thomas Kneib;Stefan Lang

  • A Mixed Model Approach for Geoadditive Hazard Regression

    Thomas Kneib;Ludwig Fahrmeir

  • Spike-and-Slab Priors for Function Selection in Structured Additive Regression Models

    Fabian Scheipl;Ludwig Fahrmeir;Thomas Kneib

  • Structured additive regression for categorical space-time data: a mixed model approach.

    Thomas Kneib;Ludwig Fahrmeir

  • Simultaneous Confidence Bands for Penalized Spline Estimators

    Tatyana Krivobokova;Thomas Kneib;Gerda Claeskens

Frequent Co-Authors

Ludwig Fahrmeir
Ludwig Fahrmeir Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Stefan Lang
Stefan Lang University of Innsbruck
Gerhard Tutz
Gerhard Tutz Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Johannes Kornhuber
Johannes Kornhuber University of Göttingen
Stephan Klasen
Stephan Klasen University of Göttingen
Achim Zeileis
Achim Zeileis University of Innsbruck
Christopher I. Amos
Christopher I. Amos Baylor College of Medicine
Robert Perneczky
Robert Perneczky Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ingo Grass
Ingo Grass University of Hohenheim

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, expanding skill sets into related fields can open diverse career opportunities. Many look toward finance as a complementary discipline, making an online masters in finance a practical choice. This degree combines quantitative analysis with financial theory, ideal for careers in investment banking, risk management, or financial planning.

Additionally, professionals aiming to fast-track their career growth might consider enrolling in accelerated MBA programs online. These programs offer flexibility and speed, allowing students to gain business leadership skills without pausing their professional lives.

Marketing is another vibrant pathway linked closely to analytical thinking and strategic insight. An affordable yet impactful option is earning a marketing masters online, which can lead to roles in market research, digital marketing, or brand management.

For those who want a comprehensive business education in a condensed timeframe, exploring the best 1 year MBA programs in USA can be highly beneficial. These programs emphasize leadership and strategy, aligning well with a math background for careers in consulting or executive management.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Kneib

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles