World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
58
Citations
22179
World Ranking
3542
National Ranking
1704

Charles M. Eastman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M. Eastman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 190 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Charles M. Eastman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M. Eastman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles M. Eastman is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the field of engineering, with a focus on building and construction, civil and structural engineering, and management science and operations research. Other areas of study include industrial and manufacturing engineering as well as artificial intelligence.

The scientist's work is centered on topics such as BIM and construction integration, infrastructure maintenance and monitoring, construction project management and performance, manufacturing process and optimization, semantic web and ontologies, 3D modeling in geospatial applications, and elevator systems and control.

Recent published papers include:

  • "Rules and validation processes for interoperable BIM data exchange" (2020), Journal of Computational Design and Engineering
  • "Simplified schema queries for supporting BIM-based rule-checking applications" (2020), Automation in Construction
  • "Automatic clash correction sequence optimization using a clash dependency network" (2020), Automation in Construction
  • "Component Change List Prediction for BIM-Based Clash Resolution from a Graph Perspective" (2021), Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
  • "BIM-Enabled Clash Resolution Optimization Based on Clash Dependent Networks" (2020), Construction Research Congress 2020

Frequent coauthors who have contributed to multiple works with the scientist include:

  • Yuqing Hu
  • Daniel Castro-Lacouture
  • Yong-Cheol Lee
  • Wawan Solihin
  • Shamkant B. Navathe

Their publications often appear in venues such as Automation in Construction, Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, and Construction Research Congress 2020.

Best Publications

  • BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors

    Chuck Eastman;Paul Teicholz;Rafael Sacks;Kathleen Liston

  • Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Safety: Automatic Safety Checking of Construction Models and Schedules

    Sijie Zhang;Jochen Teizer;Jin Kook Lee;Charles M. Eastman

  • BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers

    Rafael Sacks;Charles Eastman;Ghang Lee;Paul Teicholz

  • Automatic rule-based checking of building designs

    C. Eastman;Jae min Lee;Yeon suk Jeong;Jin kook Lee

  • A review of building information modeling (BIM) and the internet of things (IoT) devices integration: Present status and future trends

    Shu Tang;Dennis R. Shelden;Charles M. Eastman;Pardis Pishdad-Bozorgi

  • Building Product Models: Computer Environments, Supporting Design and Construction

    Charles M. Eastman

  • Specifying parametric building object behavior (BOB) for a building information modeling system

    Ghang Lee;Rafael Sacks;Charles M. Eastman

  • Parametric 3D modeling in building construction with examples from precast concrete

    Rafael Sacks;Charles M. Eastman;Ghang Lee

  • Exchange Model and Exchange Object Concepts for Implementation of National BIM Standards

    C. M. Eastman;Y.-S. Jeong;R. Sacks;I. Kaner

  • Geometric modelling: a survey

    A. Baer;C. Eastman;M. Henrion

  • Planning and developing facility management-enabled building information model (FM-enabled BIM)

    Pardis Pishdad-Bozorgi;Xinghua Gao;Charles Eastman;Alonzo Patrick Self

  • Classification of rules for automated BIM rule checking development

    W. Solihin;C. Eastman

  • Semantics of model views for information exchanges using the industry foundation class schema

    M. Venugopal;C. M. Eastman;R. Sacks;J. Teizer

  • Building information modeling : BIM in current and future practice

    Karen M. Kensek;Douglas Noble;Chuck Eastman

  • Benchmark tests for BIM data exchanges of precast concrete

    Y.-S. Jeong;C.M. Eastman;R. Sacks;I. Kaner

  • Cognitive processes and ill-defined problems: a case study from design

    Charles M. Eastman

  • Relative Productivity in the AEC Industries in the United States for On-Site and Off-Site Activities

    Charles M. Eastman;Charles M. Eastman;Rafael Sacks;Rafael Sacks

  • Workforce location tracking to model, visualize and analyze workspace requirements in building information models for construction safety planning

    Sijie Zhang;Jochen Teizer;Nipesh Pradhananga;Charles M. Eastman

  • General system architecture for BIM: An integrated approach for design and analysis

    Paola Sanguinetti;Sherif Abdelmohsen;JaeMin Lee;JinKook Lee

  • Automated space planning

    Charles M. Eastman

  • The Rosewood experiment — Building information modeling and interoperability for architectural precast facades

    Rafael Sacks;Israel Kaner;Charles M. Eastman;Yeon-Suk Jeong

  • Analysing design activity

    Charles Eastman

Frequent Co-Authors

Rafael Sacks
Rafael Sacks Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Jochen Teizer
Jochen Teizer Technical University of Denmark
Godfried Augenbroe
Godfried Augenbroe Georgia Institute of Technology
Thomas Olofsson
Thomas Olofsson Luleå University of Technology
Daniel J. Tancredi
Daniel J. Tancredi University of California, Davis
Shamkant B. Navathe
Shamkant B. Navathe Georgia Institute of Technology
Frank M. Mitloehner
Frank M. Mitloehner University of California, Davis
Richard Catrambone
Richard Catrambone Georgia Institute of Technology
Deborah H. Bennett
Deborah H. Bennett University of California, Davis
Raja R. A. Issa
Raja R. A. Issa University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens the door to a wide range of career possibilities and online learning options. Many students consider further education through online mba programs to gain business leadership skills, which are increasingly valuable in the tech industry.

For those seeking a faster path, a 1 year masters degree online can boost your credentials without a lengthy time commitment. This option is great for career changers or professionals seeking advancement.

Efficiency is a top priority for many learners. Choosing the fastest degree to get online can help you enter the workforce quickly and start earning in high-demand fields.

With artificial intelligence transforming industries, specialized credentials such as ai degrees online are increasingly popular. These programs provide expertise for cutting-edge roles in tech and data science.

Each of these pathways can complement your computer science studies and help you tailor your education to fit your career aspirations in today’s digital world.

Best Scientists Citing Charles M. Eastman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles