World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 16307 15335 8200 7585 361 20220

Daniel J. Tancredi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel J. Tancredi between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel J. Tancredi published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 14.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 52 publications in 2024. 48 of the 522 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 52. Peak 52 publications in 2024. 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 33 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 30 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 52 publications 2025: 43 publications 2026: 5 publications
1992 2026

522 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel J. Tancredi: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 3
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 2
2005 1
2006 2
2007 0
2008 2
2009 15
2010 26
2011 33
2012 25
2013 28
2014 29
2015 22
2016 28
2017 25
2018 29
2019 32
2020 23
2021 34
2022 30
2023 30
2024 52
2025 43
2026 5
Total 522
Download as CSV

Daniel J. Tancredi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Tancredi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 361 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 361
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel J. Tancredi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Tancredi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel J. Tancredi is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States and has an extensive publication record in the field of medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields including emergency medicine, public health, environmental and occupational health, epidemiology, general health professions, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Their research topics highlight a diverse focus on issues such as emergency and acute care studies, gut microbiota and health, probiotics and fermented foods, opioid use disorder treatment, infant development and preterm care, family and patient care in intensive care units, and respiratory viral infections research.

Recent notable papers authored or coauthored by Daniel J. Tancredi include:

  • Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives (2023), published in Gut Microbes
  • Association of Dose Tapering With Overdose or Mental Health Crisis Among Patients Prescribed Long-term Opioids (2021), published in JAMA
  • Should There Be a Recommended Daily Intake of Microbes? (2020), published in Journal of Nutrition
  • Post-COVID-19 Conditions Among Children 90 Days After SARS-CoV-2 Infection (2022), published in JAMA Network Open
  • A Classification System for Defining and Estimating Dietary Intake of Live Microbes in US Adults and Children (2022), published in Journal of Nutrition

The scientist frequently publishes in several journals, with a high number of papers appearing in JAMA Network Open, Academic Pediatrics, Environmental Research, Journal of Nutrition, and Injury Epidemiology.

Daniel J. Tancredi has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Their frequent coauthors include Rebecca J. Schmidt, Nathan Kuppermann, Deborah H. Bennett, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, and James P. Marcin.

Best Publications

  • Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy ☆

    Elizabeth Miller;Michele R. Decker;Heather L. McCauley;Daniel J. Tancredi

  • Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Prenatal Residential Proximity to Agricultural Pesticides: The CHARGE Study

    Janie F. Shelton;Estella Marie Geraghty;Daniel J. Tancredi;Lora D. Delwiche

  • Maternal periconceptional folic acid intake and risk of autism spectrum disorders and developmental delay in the CHARGE (CHildhood Autism Risks from Genetics and Environment) case-control study

    Rebecca Jean Schmidt;Daniel J Tancredi;Sally J Ozonoff;Robin L Hansen

  • “Coaching Boys into Men”: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dating Violence Prevention Program

    Elizabeth Miller;Daniel J. Tancredi;Heather L. McCauley;Michele R. Decker

  • Prenatal vitamins, one-carbon metabolism gene variants, and risk for autism

    Rebecca Jean Schmidt;Robin L Hansen;Jaana Hartiala;Hooman Allayee

  • Effect of a Patient-Centered Communication Intervention on Oncologist-Patient Communication, Quality of Life, and Health Care Utilization in Advanced Cancer: The VOICE Randomized Clinical Trial

    Ronald M. Epstein;Paul R. Duberstein;Joshua J. Fenton;Kevin Fiscella

  • The prevalence of gastrointestinal problems in children across the United States with autism spectrum disorders from families with multiple affected members.

    Lulu W. Wang;Daniel J. Tancredi;Dan W. Thomas

  • Neonatal Cytokine Profiles Associated With Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Paula Krakowiak;Paula E. Goines;Daniel J Tancredi;Paul Ashwood

  • Physician career satisfaction within specialties

    J Paul Leigh;Daniel J Tancredi;Richard L Kravitz

  • A family planning clinic partner violence intervention to reduce risk associated with reproductive coercion

    Elizabeth Miller;Michele R. Decker;Heather L. McCauley;Daniel J. Tancredi

  • Independent and dependent contributions of advanced maternal and paternal ages to autism risk

    Janie F. Shelton;Daniel J. Tancredi;Irva Hertz-Picciotto

  • Evaluation of the predictive value of ICD-9-CM coded administrative data for venous thromboembolism in the United States ☆

    Richard H. White;Martina Garcia;Banafsheh Sadeghi;Daniel J. Tancredi

  • Empyema Hospitalizations Increased in US Children Despite Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine

    Su-Ting Terry Li;Daniel J Tancredi

  • Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clients

    Elizabeth Miller;Heather L. McCauley;Daniel J. Tancredi;Michele R. Decker

  • Lactobacillus reuteri to Treat Infant Colic: A Meta-analysis.

    Valerie Sung;Frank D'Amico;Frank D'Amico;Michael D. Cabana;Kim Chau

  • One-year follow-up of a coach-delivered dating violence prevention program: A cluster randomized controlled trial

    Elizabeth Miller;Daniel J. Tancredi;Heather L. McCauley;Michele R. Decker

  • Immigration to the USA and risk for mood and anxiety disorders: variation by origin and age at immigration.

    J. Breslau;G. Borges;Y. Hagar;Daniel J Tancredi

  • Association of Dose Tapering With Overdose or Mental Health Crisis Among Patients Prescribed Long-term Opioids

    Alicia Agnoli;Guibo Xing;Daniel J Tancredi;Elizabeth Magnan

  • Pilot study of probiotic/colostrum supplementation on gut function in children with autism and gastrointestinal symptoms.

    Megan R. Sanctuary;Jennifer N. Kain;Shin Yu Chen;Karen Kalanetra

  • Maternal Intake of Supplemental Iron and Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Rebecca Jean Schmidt;Daniel J Tancredi;Paula Krakowiak;Robin L Hansen

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard L. Kravitz
Richard L. Kravitz University of California, Davis
Deborah H. Bennett
Deborah H. Bennett University of California, Davis
Irva Hertz-Picciotto
Irva Hertz-Picciotto University of California, Davis
Peter Franks
Peter Franks University of California, Davis
Patrick S. Romano
Patrick S. Romano University of California, Davis
Heather L. McCauley
Heather L. McCauley Michigan State University
Jay G. Silverman
Jay G. Silverman University of California, San Diego
Michele R. Decker
Michele R. Decker Johns Hopkins University
Kevin Fiscella
Kevin Fiscella University of Rochester Medical Center
Paul R. Duberstein
Paul R. Duberstein Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers beyond traditional medicine, there are several flexible pathways available online. Many students from non-nursing backgrounds are exploring direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors, which allow individuals to transition into nursing at an advanced level without a prior BSN degree.

For applicants looking for accessibility, there are options among the easiest nursing schools to get into. These institutions may have more flexible admission requirements, making nursing education more attainable.

Allied health roles such as medical billing and coding are also in high demand and can often be pursued fully online. If you are seeking affordability and approved programs, you can research accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid.

Finally, some nursing schools have waived standard entrance tests, making them more accessible. If you are curious about requirements like the TEAS or HESI exams, read more: do you have to take a teas test for lpn.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel J. Tancredi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles