World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4132
World Ranking
10934
National Ranking
5714

Michael Hoerger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Hoerger sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael Hoerger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Hoerger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Hoerger is affiliated with Tulane University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Psychology. Their work spans various subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Oncology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's research topics focus significantly on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life, Cancer Survivorship and Care, COVID-19 and Mental Health, Patient Dignity and Privacy, COVID-19 and Healthcare Impacts, and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health.

Michael Hoerger has contributed to several scholarly publication venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Journal of Palliative Medicine
  • Psycho-Oncology
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • JAMA Oncology
  • Supportive Care in Cancer

Notable recent papers include:

  • Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health: Real-time surveillance using Google Trends., 2020, Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • Racial Disparities in End-of-Life Care Between Black and White Adults With Metastatic Cancer, 2020, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • Anxiety, depression, and end-of-life care utilization in adults with metastatic cancer, 2021, Psycho-Oncology
  • Correlates of death among SARS-CoV-2 positive veterans: The contribution of lifetime tobacco use, 2020, Addictive Behaviors
  • Summarizing the Evidence Base for Palliative Oncology Care: A Critical Evaluation of the Meta-analyses, 2020, Clinical Medicine Insights Oncology

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Laura M. Perry
  • Brenna Mossman
  • James Gerhart
  • Sarah Alonzi
  • Seowoo Kim

Best Publications

  • Participant Dropout as a Function of Survey Length in Internet-Mediated University Studies: Implications for Study Design and Voluntary Participation in Psychological Research

    Michael Hoerger

  • Effect of a Patient-Centered Communication Intervention on Oncologist-Patient Communication, Quality of Life, and Health Care Utilization in Advanced Cancer: The VOICE Randomized Clinical Trial

    Ronald M. Epstein;Paul R. Duberstein;Joshua J. Fenton;Kevin Fiscella

  • Defining the Elements of Early Palliative Care That Are Associated With Patient-Reported Outcomes and the Delivery of End-of-Life Care

    Michael Hoerger;Joseph A. Greer;Vicki A. Jackson;Elyse R. Park

  • Development and validation of the Delaying Gratification Inventory

    Michael Hoerger;Stuart W. Quirk;Nathan C. Weed

  • Determinants of Patient-Oncologist Prognostic Discordance in Advanced Cancer.

    Robert Gramling;Kevin Fiscella;Guibo Xing;Michael Hoerger

  • Parental Child-Rearing Strategies Influence Self-Regulation, Socio-Emotional Adjustment, and Psychopathology in Early Adulthood: Evidence from a Retrospective Cohort Study

    Courtney N. Baker;Michael Hoerger

  • Values and options in cancer care (VOICE): study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers

    Michael Hoerger;Ronald M Epstein;Paul C Winters;Kevin Fiscella

  • Emotional intelligence: a theoretical framework for individual differences in affective forecasting.

    Michael Hoerger;Benjamin P. Chapman;Ronald M. Epstein;Paul R. Duberstein

  • When does haste make waste? Speed-accuracy tradeoff, skill level, and the tools of the trade.

    Sian L. Beilock;Bennett I. Bertenthal;Michael Hoerger;Thomas H. Carr

  • Affective forecasting and self-rated symptoms of depression, anxiety, and hypomania: evidence for a dysphoric forecasting bias.

    Michael Hoerger;Stuart W. Quirk;Benjamin P. Chapman;Paul R. Duberstein

  • Preference for Palliative Care in Cancer Patients: Are Men and Women Alike?

    Fahad Saeed;Michael Hoerger;Sally A. Norton;Elizabeth Guancial

  • Toward identifying the effects of the specific components of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on biologic and emotional outcomes among older adults.

    Autumn M. Gallegos;Michael Hoerger;Nancy L. Talbot;Michael S. Krasner

  • Impulsive responses to positive mood and reward are related to mania risk

    Alison Giovanelli;Michael Hoerger;Sheri L. Johnson;June Gruber

  • Emotional Benefits of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in Older Adults: The Moderating Roles of Age and Depressive Symptom Severity

    Autumn M. Gallegos;Michael Hoerger;Nancy L. Talbot;Jan A. Moynihan

  • Immune neglect in affective forecasting.

    Michael Hoerger;Stuart W. Quirk;Richard E. Lucas;Thomas H. Carr

  • Quality of Life of Caregivers of Older Patients with Advanced Cancer

    Lee A. Kehoe;Huiwen Xu;Huiwen Xu;Paul Duberstein;Kah Poh Loh

  • Cognitive Determinants of Affective Forecasting Errors

    Michael Hoerger;Stuart W. Quirk;Richard E. Lucas;Thomas H. Carr

  • Affective forecasting and the Big Five

    Michael Hoerger;Stuart W. Quirk

  • Financial Strain and Physical and Emotional Quality of Life in Breast Cancer

    Laura M. Perry;Michael Hoerger;Katherine Seibert;James I. Gerhart

  • Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health: Real-time surveillance using Google Trends.

    Michael Hoerger;Sarah Alonzi;Laura M. Perry;Hallie M. Voss

  • Experiential avoidance and interpersonal problems: A moderated mediation model

    James I Gerhart;Courtney N. Baker;Michael P Hoerger;George F Ronan

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul R. Duberstein
Paul R. Duberstein Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Ronald M. Epstein
Ronald M. Epstein University of Rochester Medical Center
Supriya G. Mohile
Supriya G. Mohile University of Rochester Medical Center
Benjamin P. Chapman
Benjamin P. Chapman University of Rochester Medical Center
Daniel J. Tancredi
Daniel J. Tancredi University of California, Davis
Richard L. Kravitz
Richard L. Kravitz University of California, Davis
Holly G. Prigerson
Holly G. Prigerson Cornell University
Angela Fagerlin
Angela Fagerlin University of Utah
Lucio Miele
Lucio Miele Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans
Oliver Sartor
Oliver Sartor Tulane University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens a diverse range of career pathways, including options in counseling, human services, and mental health. Many students pursue graduate-level credentials that provide eligibility for roles such as school counselor, mental health counselor, or behavioral therapist. Each state has its own unique certification and licensure requirements, so it's vital to plan your studies accordingly.

For those interested in working within educational settings, becoming a school counselor is a popular career trajectory. If you plan to practice in Connecticut, review the Connecticut school counselor certification requirements. Individuals aiming to work in Delaware can consult specific guidelines for becoming a school counselor in Delaware. Likewise, those exploring jobs in Florida should be aware of the Florida school counselor certification requirements, while aspiring professionals in Georgia will need to follow the Georgia school counselor education requirements.

Understanding these state-specific requirements will help you choose the right online degree and prepare for a rewarding career in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Hoerger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles