World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 77 464 399 219 185 333 20756

Angela Fagerlin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Angela Fagerlin between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Angela Fagerlin published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 14 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2021. 41 of the 419 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2021. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 50 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 15 publications
1996 2025

419 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Angela Fagerlin: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 4
2002 3
2003 5
2004 13
2005 16
2006 11
2007 7
2008 11
2009 2
2010 16
2011 9
2012 8
2013 14
2014 19
2015 17
2016 23
2017 27
2018 28
2019 22
2020 22
2021 50
2022 24
2023 24
2024 26
2025 15
Total 419
Download as CSV

Angela Fagerlin publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela Fagerlin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 324–333 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 333 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81 333
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Angela Fagerlin D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela Fagerlin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30 77
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Angela Fagerlin is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their research spans several subfields, including General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's work primarily addresses topics within patient-provider communication in healthcare, health systems and economic evaluations, quality of life, global cancer incidence and screening, palliative care and end-of-life issues, patient satisfaction in healthcare, vaccine coverage and hesitancy, and primary care and health outcomes.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Cancer Misinformation and Harmful Information on Facebook and Other Social Media: A Brief Report (2021), JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • User Involvement in the Design and Development of Patient Decision Aids and Other Personal Health Tools: A Systematic Review (2021), Medical Decision Making
  • Clarifying Values: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2021), Medical Decision Making
  • Experiences of a Health System's Faculty, Staff, and Trainees' Career Development, Work Culture, and Childcare Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021), JAMA Network Open
  • Communicating Scientific Uncertainty About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Online Experimental Study of an Uncertainty-Normalizing Strategy (2021), Journal of Medical Internet Research

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Angela Fagerlin include:

  • Alistair Thorpe
  • Laura D. Scherer
  • Peter A. Ubel
  • Rebecca K. Delaney
  • Elissa M. Ozanne

Publication venues where their work appears regularly consist of:

  • JAMA Network Open
  • Medical Decision Making
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • MDM Policy & Practice
  • BMJ Open

Best Publications

  • Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale

    Angela Fagerlin;Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher;Peter A. Ubel;Aleksandra Jankovic

  • Enough: The Failure of the Living Will

    Angela Fagerlin;Carl E. Schneider

  • Helping Patients Decide: Ten Steps to Better Risk Communication

    Angela Fagerlin;Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher;Peter A. Ubel

  • Advance Directives as Acts of Communication A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Peter Ditto;Joseph Danks;William Smucker;J. Bookwala

  • The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices.

    Sarah T. Hawley;Brian Zikmund-Fisher;Peter Ubel;Aleksandra Jancovic

  • Reducing the Influence of Anecdotal Reasoning on People's Health Care Decisions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Statistics?

    Angela Fagerlin;Catharine Wang;Peter A. Ubel

  • Ignorance of Hedonic Adaptation to Hemodialysis: A Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment

    Jason Riis;George Loewenstein;Jonathan Baron;Christopher Jepson

  • Satisfaction with Surgery Outcomes and the Decision Process in a Population‐Based Sample of Women with Breast Cancer

    Paula M. Lantz;Nancy K. Janz;Angela Fagerlin;Kendra Schwartz

  • Validation of the subjective numeracy scale: Effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations

    Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher;Dylan M. Smith;Peter A. Ubel;Angela Fagerlin

  • Patient Involvement in Surgery Treatment Decisions for Breast Cancer

    Steven J. Katz;Paula M. Lantz;Nancy K. Janz;Angela Fagerlin

  • Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice.

    Wendy Nelson;Valerie F. Reyna;Valerie F. Reyna;Angela Fagerlin;Isaac Lipkus

  • Disciplinary Differences in Self-Regulated Learning in College Students

    Scott W. Vanderstoep;Paul R. Pintrich;Angela Fagerlin

  • Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments.

    Angela Fagerlin;Peter H. Ditto;Joseph H. Danks;Renate M. Houts

  • Making numbers matter: present and future research in risk communication

    Angela Fagerlin;Peter A. Ubel;Dylan M. Smith;Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher

  • Clarifying values: an updated review

    Angela Fagerlin;Michael Pignone;Purva Abhyankar;Nananda F. Col

  • The Influence of Race, Ethnicity, and Individual Socioeconomic Factors on Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis

    Paula M. Lantz;Mahasin Mujahid;Kendra Schwartz;Nancy K. Janz

  • A Matter of Perspective: Choosing for Others Differs from Choosing for Yourself in Making Treatment Decisions

    Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher;Brianna Sarr;Angela Fagerlin;Peter A. Ubel

  • Biased Assimilation of Sociopolitical Arguments: Evaluating the 1996 U.S. Presidential Debate

    Geoffrey D. Munro;Peter H. Ditto;Lisa K. Lockhart;Angela Fagerlin

  • Population-based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer.

    Nancy K. Janz;Mahasin Mujahid;Paula M. Lantz;Angela Fagerlin;Angela Fagerlin

  • Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs.

    Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher;Peter A. Ubel;Dylan M. Smith;Holly A. Derry

  • The effect of format on parents' understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics.

    Alan R. Tait;Terri Voepel-Lewis;Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher;Angela Fagerlin

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Peter A. Ubel
Peter A. Ubel Duke University
Steven J. Katz
Steven J. Katz University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Monica Morrow
Monica Morrow Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Dennis Deapen
Dennis Deapen University of Southern California
Peter H. Ditto
Peter H. Ditto University of California, Irvine
Lewis B. Morgenstern
Lewis B. Morgenstern University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John T. Wei
John T. Wei University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stacy Loeb
Stacy Loeb New York University
Mick P. Couper
Mick P. Couper University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The Social Sciences and Humanities offer diverse opportunities for study and professional growth in the USA. Online education has made these fields more accessible, especially for those seeking flexibility or accelerated pacing. For students interested in direct service careers, masters in social work accelerated programs can fast-track your path to becoming a licensed clinical social worker.

For those drawn to understanding human behavior, an accelerated psychology degree online is a dynamic option, helping you begin your career in psychology or counseling without delay. If counseling is your goal, look for cacrep online masters in counseling programs, which meet crucial accreditation standards for professional practice.

Family and relationship therapy is another rewarding path. Consider the cheapest online mft programs for affordable and flexible options that prepare you for licensure as a marriage and family therapist. These online degrees can open doors to meaningful careers that improve individual and community well-being.

Best Scientists Citing Angela Fagerlin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles