World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 100 97 80 48 41 447 34149
Medicine 100 8320 7820 4301 3982 458 33936

Peter A. Ubel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter A. Ubel between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter A. Ubel published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 13.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2008. 17 of the 520 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2008. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 21 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
1988 2026

520 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter A. Ubel: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 2
1994 5
1995 5
1996 10
1997 13
1998 9
1999 13
2000 14
2001 21
2002 16
2003 16
2004 11
2005 23
2006 13
2007 15
2008 28
2009 15
2010 19
2011 20
2012 11
2013 18
2014 28
2015 15
2016 20
2017 17
2018 12
2019 26
2020 9
2021 27
2022 16
2023 16
2024 18
2025 16
2026 1
Total 520
Download as CSV

Peter A. Ubel publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Ubel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 444–453 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 447 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25 447
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter A. Ubel D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Ubel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United States Leader Award
  • 2019 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Peter A. Ubel is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has an extensive research record primarily in the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their work spans major subfields including General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Oncology.

Their research topics cover a diverse range of themes such as Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, and Quality of Life, Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Diversity and Career in Medicine, Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer, Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life.

Peter A. Ubel has contributed to several recent papers published in high-impact journals. Notable examples include:

  • Withdrawal of Life-supporting Treatment in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, 2020, JAMA Surgery
  • Minority Tax Reform - Avoiding Overtaxing Minorities When We Need Them Most, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Strategies for research participant engagement: A synthetic review and conceptual framework, 2021, Clinical Trials
  • Workplace Harassment, Cyber Incivility, and Climate in Academic Medicine, 2023, JAMA
  • The ALIGN Framework, 2022, Neurology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter A. Ubel include:

  • Angela Fagerlin
  • Kathryn I. Pollak
  • J. Kelly Davis
  • Monica E. Lemmon
  • Ada Campagna

Peter A. Ubel has published repeatedly in prominent academic journals. Their frequent publication venues comprise:

  • JAMA Network Open
  • The American Journal of Bioethics
  • New England Journal of Medicine
  • JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Patient Education and Counseling

In 2019, Peter A. Ubel was recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), which reflects their involvement and standing in the medical research community.

Best Publications

  • Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale

    Angela Fagerlin;Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher;Peter A. Ubel;Aleksandra Jankovic

  • Gender Differences in Time Spent on Parenting and Domestic Responsibilities by High-Achieving Young Physician-Researchers

    Shruti Jolly;Kent A. Griffith;Rochelle DeCastro;Abigail Stewart

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology Guidance Statement: The Cost of Cancer Care

    Neal J. Meropol;Deborah Schrag;Thomas J. Smith;Therese M. Mulvey

  • What Is the Price of Life and Why Doesn't It Increase at the Rate of Inflation?

    Peter A. Ubel;Richard A. Hirth;Michael E. Chernew;A. Mark Fendrick

  • Helping Patients Decide: Ten Steps to Better Risk Communication

    Angela Fagerlin;Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher;Peter A. Ubel

  • Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public

    Peter A. Ubel;George Loewenstein;Christopher Jepson

  • Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes.

    Erik Nord;Jose Luis Pinto;Jeff Richardson;Paul Menzel

  • The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices.

    Sarah T. Hawley;Brian Zikmund-Fisher;Peter Ubel;Aleksandra Jancovic

  • Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Experiences of Academic Medical Faculty.

    Reshma Jagsi;Kent A. Griffith;Rochelle Jones;Chithra R. Perumalswami

  • Reducing the Influence of Anecdotal Reasoning on People's Health Care Decisions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Statistics?

    Angela Fagerlin;Catharine Wang;Peter A. Ubel

  • Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers.

    Reshma Jagsi;Kent A. Griffith;Abigail Stewart;Dana Sambuco

  • Ignorance of Hedonic Adaptation to Hemodialysis: A Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment

    Jason Riis;George Loewenstein;Jonathan Baron;Christopher Jepson

  • Misimagining the unimaginable: the disability paradox and health care decision making.

    Peter A. Ubel;George Loewenstein;Norbert Schwarz;Dylan Smith

  • When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make?

    Michele Heisler;Sandeep Vijan;Robert M. Anderson;Peter A. Ubel

  • Validation of the subjective numeracy scale: Effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations

    Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher;Dylan M. Smith;Peter A. Ubel;Angela Fagerlin

  • The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform.

    Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler;Peter A. Ubel

  • Patient Comprehension of Emergency Department Care and Instructions: Are Patients Aware of When They Do Not Understand?

    Kirsten G. Engel;Kirsten G. Engel;Michele Heisler;Dylan M. Smith;Claire H. Robinson

  • Harnessing the power of default options to improve health care.

    Scott D Halpern;Peter A Ubel;David A Asch

  • Solid-Organ Transplantation in HIV-Infected Patients

    Scott D Halpern;Peter A Ubel;Arthur L Caplan

  • Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs.

    Michael F. Drummond;David A. Wilson;Panos Kanavos;Peter Ubel

Frequent Co-Authors

Angela Fagerlin
Angela Fagerlin University of Utah
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David A. Asch
David A. Asch University of Pennsylvania
George Loewenstein
George Loewenstein Carnegie Mellon University
Jonathan Baron
Jonathan Baron University of Pennsylvania
Reshma Jagsi
Reshma Jagsi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Abigail J. Stewart
Abigail J. Stewart University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James A. Tulsky
James A. Tulsky Harvard University
John C. Hershey
John C. Hershey University of Pennsylvania
Kent A. Griffith
Kent A. Griffith University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and career opportunities. Many students are now seeking flexible and fast-tracked options to enter fields like social work, psychology, counseling, and therapy.

For those wishing to advance their impact quickly, masters in social work accelerated programs offer an efficient pathway to professional roles in community organizations and public service. Similarly, students interested in mental health and human behavior can consider pursuing an accelerated psychology degree, allowing quicker access to careers in clinical or counseling psychology.

Cost-conscious learners can explore the cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited) for accredited education that prepares graduates for licensure and jobs in school settings. Alternatively, those passionate about supporting families can look to reputable online mft programs accredited for a streamlined route into marriage and family therapy roles.

With a range of flexible and affordable online options, students can start or shift their careers across the social sciences and humanities, making an impact in diverse communities.

Best Scientists Citing Peter A. Ubel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles