World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 98 8914 8366 4586 4243 771 35515

Reshma Jagsi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Reshma Jagsi between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Reshma Jagsi published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 37.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 95 publications in 2021. 90 of the 858 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 95. Peak 95 publications in 2021. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 32 publications 2014: 40 publications 2015: 44 publications 2016: 44 publications 2017: 67 publications 2018: 58 publications 2019: 81 publications 2020: 83 publications 2021: 95 publications 2022: 62 publications 2023: 63 publications 2024: 51 publications 2025: 39 publications
2003 2025

858 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Reshma Jagsi: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 7
2005 7
2006 11
2007 7
2008 7
2009 11
2010 15
2011 13
2012 19
2013 32
2014 40
2015 44
2016 44
2017 67
2018 58
2019 81
2020 83
2021 95
2022 62
2023 63
2024 51
2025 39
Total 858
Download as CSV

Reshma Jagsi publications per year - data summary

  • Reshma Jagsi, a Medicine scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, has 858 publications recorded across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2003 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 95 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2003, with 2 publications.
  • The rate of publication averages 37.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 37.3 per year counting only the 23 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 310 publications, 36% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2003-2010: 67 publications (8.4 per year); 2011-2018: 317 publications (39.6 per year); 2019-2025: 474 publications (67.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Reshma Jagsi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reshma Jagsi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 761–780 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 771 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228 771
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Reshma Jagsi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Reshma Jagsi, a Medicine scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, records 771 publications - the 86th percentile of the discipline.
  • 86% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Reshma Jagsi, and about 14% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Reshma Jagsi ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Reshma Jagsi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reshma Jagsi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668 98
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Reshma Jagsi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Reshma Jagsi, a Medicine scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, records 98 D-Index - the 57th percentile of the discipline.
  • 57% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Reshma Jagsi, and about 43% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Reshma Jagsi ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Reshma Jagsi is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans numerous facets of medicine, with a particular focus on gender studies, oncology, radiology, and public health. Their work integrates economic and health system evaluations within the medical field.

Their recent publications include:

  • COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected, 2020, eLife
  • Trastuzumab for early-stage, HER2-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 13,864 women in seven randomised trials, 2021, The Lancet Oncology
  • Academic Productivity Differences by Gender and Child Age in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine Faculty During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, Journal of Women's Health
  • Readability of Patient Education Materials From High-Impact Medical Journals: A 20-Year Analysis, 2021, Journal of Patient Experience
  • International Guidelines on Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, Clinical Oncology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jagsi include:

  • Kent A. Griffith
  • Lori J. Pierce
  • James A. Hayman
  • Christina Mangurian
  • Jean M. Moran

Their publications appear predominantly in these venues:

  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Journal of Women's Health
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Cancer Research

Jagsi's research contributions encompass key fields of study such as:

  • Medicine

Their subfields of research include:

  • Gender Studies
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Oncology
  • Economics and Econometrics

Main topics in their research cover:

  • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
  • Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening

Best Publications

  • The “Gender Gap” in Authorship of Academic Medical Literature — A 35-Year Perspective

    Reshma Jagsi;Elizabeth A. Guancial;Cynthia Cooper Worobey;Lori E. Henault

  • Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials

    Bernard Asselain;William Barlow;John Bartlett;Jonas Bergh

  • Gender Differences in Time Spent on Parenting and Domestic Responsibilities by High-Achieving Young Physician-Researchers

    Shruti Jolly;Kent A. Griffith;Rochelle DeCastro;Abigail Stewart

  • Development and Validation of a Heart Atlas to Study Cardiac Exposure to Radiation Following Treatment for Breast Cancer

    Mary Feng;Jean M. Moran;Todd Koelling;Aamer Chughtai

  • Estimating the Risks of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: Evidence From Modern Radiation Doses to the Lungs and Heart and From Previous Randomized Trials.

    Carolyn Taylor;Candace Correa;Frances K Duane;Marianne C Aznar

  • Radiation therapy for the whole breast: Executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline.

    Benjamin D. Smith;Jennifer R. Bellon;Rachel Blitzblau;Gary Freedman

  • Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Experiences of Academic Medical Faculty.

    Reshma Jagsi;Kent A. Griffith;Rochelle Jones;Chithra R. Perumalswami

  • Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers.

    Reshma Jagsi;Kent A. Griffith;Abigail Stewart;Dana Sambuco

  • Trends and Variation in Use of Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Mastectomy in the United States

    Reshma Jagsi;Jing Jiang;Adeyiza O. Momoh;Amy Alderman

  • Radiation Field Design in the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Trial

    Reshma Jagsi;Manjeet Chadha;Janaki Moni;Janaki Moni;Karla Ballman

  • COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected.

    Jens Peter Andersen;Mathias Wullum Nielsen;Nicole L Simone;Resa E Lewiss

  • Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer

    Monica Morrow;Reshma Jagsi;Amy K. Alderman;Jennifer J. Griggs

  • Increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy by more frequent administration or sequential scheduling: a patient-level meta-analysis of 37 298 women with early breast cancer in 26 randomised trials

    Richard Gray;Rosie Bradley;Jeremy Braybrooke;Zulian Liu

  • Exposure of the Heart in Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review of Heart Doses Published During 2003 to 2013

    Carolyn W. Taylor;Zhe Wang;Elizabeth Macaulay;Reshma Jagsi

  • Residents report on adverse events and their causes.

    Reshma Jagsi;Barrett T. Kitch;Debra F. Weinstein;Eric G. Campbell

  • Mentor networks in academic medicine: moving beyond a dyadic conception of mentoring for junior faculty researchers.

    Rochelle DeCastro;Dana Sambuco;Peter A. Ubel;Abigail Stewart

  • Long-Term Financial Burden of Breast Cancer: Experiences of a Diverse Cohort of Survivors Identified Through Population-Based Registries

    Reshma Jagsi;John A.E. Pottow;Kent A. Griffith;Cathy Bradley

  • Unacceptable cosmesis in a protocol investigating intensity-modulated radiotherapy with active breathing control for accelerated partial-breast irradiation.

    Reshma Jagsi;Merav A. Ben-David;Jean M. Moran;Robin B. Marsh

  • Sex Differences in Attainment of Independent Funding by Career Development Awardees

    Reshma Jagsi;Amy R. Motomura;Kent A. Griffith;Soumya Rangarajan

  • Current Perceptions Regarding Surgical Margin Status After Breast-Conserving Therapy: Results of a Survey

    Alphonse Taghian;Majid Mohiuddin;Reshma Jagsi;Saveli Goldberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Kent A. Griffith
Kent A. Griffith University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Steven J. Katz
Steven J. Katz University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lori J. Pierce
Lori J. Pierce University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ann S. Hamilton
Ann S. Hamilton University of Southern California
Monica Morrow
Monica Morrow Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Allison W. Kurian
Allison W. Kurian Stanford University
Peter A. Ubel
Peter A. Ubel Duke University
Yun Li
Yun Li University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Sharon H. Giordano
Sharon H. Giordano The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Bruce G. Haffty
Bruce G. Haffty Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to many related fields and advanced roles within healthcare. For those interested in the business side of the industry, earning an online healthcare administration degree can pave the way to leadership positions in hospitals or clinics. These programs are flexible and often designed to accommodate working professionals.

If you’re seeking graduate-level expertise, consider one of the cheapest online mha programs for an affordable path to a Master’s in Healthcare Administration. This qualification can enhance your credentials and help you compete for top administrative roles.

Advancing your clinical practice is also possible online. For registered nurses, the cheapest online bsn to dnp programs allow you to move into the highest level of nursing practice, often leading to more autonomy and influence in patient care.

Those drawn to pharmaceuticals may benefit from the best online pharmacy school options. These programs are designed to provide comprehensive training, preparing graduates for rewarding roles in pharmacy and medication management.

Each of these pathways can expand your career opportunities within the healthcare industry—often with the convenience and affordability that online learning offers.

Best Scientists Citing Reshma Jagsi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles