World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
34729
World Ranking
7717
National Ranking
4014

Andrea L. Pusic publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea L. Pusic sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 578 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Andrea L. Pusic D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea L. Pusic sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrea L. Pusic is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States and has produced a significant body of research primarily in the field of medicine, with a strong focus on surgery and oncology. Their work extends into subfields including general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, and cancer research.

Their research covers several main topics, notably:

  • Breast Implant and Reconstruction
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Cancer Survivorship and Care
  • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Andrea L. Pusic include:

  • Anne F. Klassen
  • Manraj Kaur
  • Babak J. Mehrara
  • Jonas A. Nelson
  • Elena Tsangaris

Their work has been published in a variety of venues, with notable frequent publications in:

  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Annals of Surgery
  • Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Andrea L. Pusic include:

  • Financial Toxicity Among Patients With Breast Cancer Worldwide, 2023, JAMA Network Open
  • Obesity and Breast Reconstruction: Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Study, 2020, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
  • Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes following Surgical Treatment of Lymphedema, 2020, Cancers
  • Breast Implant-associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Incidence, 2020, Annals of Surgery
  • Towards Patient-centered Decision-making in Breast Cancer Surgery, 2021, Annals of Surgery

Best Publications

  • Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q.

    Andrea L. Pusic;Anne F. Klassen;Amie M. Scott;Jennifer A. Klok

  • A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates.

    Claudia R. Albornoz;Peter B. Bach;Babak J. Mehrara;Joseph J. Disa

  • Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps.

    Duc T Bui;Peter G Cordeiro;Qun-Ying Hu;Joseph J Disa

  • Free-flap mandibular reconstruction: a 10-year follow-up study.

    David A. Hidalgo;Andrea L. Pusic

  • Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk.

    Colleen M. McCarthy;Babak J. Mehrara;Elyn Riedel;Kristen Davidge

  • Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients.

    Peter G Cordeiro;Andrea L Pusic;Joseph J Disa;Beryl McCormick

  • Validation of the Caprini Risk Assessment Model in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Patients

    Christopher J. Pannucci;Steven H. Bailey;George Dreszer;Christine Fisher Wachtman

  • Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

    Katherine B. Santosa;Ji Qi;Hyungjin M. Kim;Jennifer B. Hamill

  • A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method.

    Yeliz Cemal;Claudia R. Albornoz;Joseph J. Disa;Colleen M. McCarthy

  • Updated international clinical recommendations on scar management: part 2--algorithms for scar prevention and treatment.

    Michael H Gold;Michael McGuire;Thomas A Mustoe;Andrea Pusic

  • A prospective surveillance model for rehabilitation for women with breast cancer

    Nicole L. Stout;Jill M. Binkley;Kathryn H. Schmitz;Kimberly Andrews

  • The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009–2015

    Wess A. Cohen;Lily R. Mundy;Tiffany N.S. Ballard;Anne Klassen

  • The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples.

    Stefan J. Cano;Anne F. Klassen;Amie M. Scott;Peter G. Cordeiro

  • Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments

    Andrea L Pusic;Constance M Chen;Stefan Cano;Anne Klassen

  • Measuring patient-reported outcomes in facial aesthetic patients: development of the FACE-Q.

    Anne F Klassen;Stefan J Cano;Amie Scott;Laura Snell

  • Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship Period.

    Emily S. Hu;Andrea L. Pusic;Jennifer F. Waljee;Latoya Kuhn

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.

    Andrea L. Pusic;Evan Matros;Neil Fine;Edward Buchel

  • Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer and Risk-Reducing Surgery: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Experience

    Paulo de Alcantara Filho;Deborah Capko;John Mitchel Barry;Monica Morrow

  • Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications.

    Anuja K. Antony;Colleen M. McCarthy;Peter G. Cordeiro;Babak J. Mehrara

  • Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: Outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients

    P. G. Cordeiro;A. L. Pusic;J. J. Disa;B. McCormick

Frequent Co-Authors

Babak J. Mehrara
Babak J. Mehrara Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Peter G. Cordeiro
Peter G. Cordeiro Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Monica Morrow
Monica Morrow Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Peter Fayers
Peter Fayers University of Aberdeen
Jane M Blazeby
Jane M Blazeby University of Bristol
Clifford Y. Ko
Clifford Y. Ko University of California, Los Angeles
Reshma Jagsi
Reshma Jagsi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Snehal G. Patel
Snehal G. Patel Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Andrew J. Vickers
Andrew J. Vickers Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Dennis H. Kraus
Dennis H. Kraus Northwell Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways and online degrees can be a smart move for students interested in medicine and healthcare. Many opt for nursing as a practical route. For those who already have an RN license, pursuing the cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs is an affordable and flexible way to enhance qualifications. These programs are designed for working professionals looking to earn a bachelor’s degree without breaking the bank.

Alternatively, individuals with a non-nursing degree might consider a direct entry msn online program, which allows for a fast-track transition into advanced nursing roles. Prospective students often seek out what is the easiest nursing program to get into to maximize their chances of acceptance and begin making an impact sooner.

Beyond clinical roles, medical billing and coding careers are growing fast. Taking classes through the financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes can help reduce the financial barrier to entry and open the door to a vital health administration field.

Best Scientists Citing Andrea L. Pusic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles