World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
21870
World Ranking
17183
National Ranking
8615

Peter G. Cordeiro publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter G. Cordeiro sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 242 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter G. Cordeiro D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter G. Cordeiro sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter G. Cordeiro is affiliated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a strong focus on Surgery. The subfields of study include Surgery, Cancer Research, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research concentrates on topics such as Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques, Breast Implant and Reconstruction, Breast Cancer Treatment Studies, Surgical Site Infection Prevention, Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques, Facial Trauma and Fracture Management, and Trauma Management and Diagnosis.

Key recent publications authored by Peter G. Cordeiro include:

  • Risk of breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) in a cohort of 3546 women prospectively followed long term after reconstruction with textured breast implants, 2020, Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter G. Cordeiro consist of:

  • Jonas A. Nelson
  • Babak J. Mehrara
  • Evan Matros
  • Joseph J. Disa
  • Colleen M. McCarthy

Peter G. Cordeiro has published extensively in several notable venues. Among the most frequent are:

  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Aesthetic Surgery Journal
  • Microsurgery

Best Publications

  • Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q.

    Andrea L. Pusic;Anne F. Klassen;Amie M. Scott;Jennifer A. Klok

  • A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates.

    Claudia R. Albornoz;Peter B. Bach;Babak J. Mehrara;Joseph J. Disa

  • Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps.

    Duc T Bui;Peter G Cordeiro;Qun-Ying Hu;Joseph J Disa

  • Reconstruction of the mandible with osseous free flaps: a 10-year experience with 150 consecutive patients.

    Peter G. Cordeiro;Joseph J. Disa;David A. Hidalgo;Qun Ying Hu

  • A classification system and algorithm for reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects.

    Peter G. Cordeiro;Eric Santamaria

  • Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk.

    Colleen M. McCarthy;Babak J. Mehrara;Elyn Riedel;Kristen Davidge

  • Factors associated with complications in microvascular reconstruction of head and neck defects.

    Bhuvanesh Singh;Peter G. Cordeiro;Eric Santamaria;Ashok R. Shaha

  • Breast Reconstruction after Surgery for Breast Cancer

    Peter G. Cordeiro

  • Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients.

    Peter G Cordeiro;Andrea L Pusic;Joseph J Disa;Beryl McCormick

  • A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part I. A prospective analysis of early complications.

    Peter G Cordeiro;Colleen M McCarthy

  • A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method.

    Yeliz Cemal;Claudia R. Albornoz;Joseph J. Disa;Colleen M. McCarthy

  • A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part II. An analysis of long-term complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction.

    Peter G Cordeiro;Colleen M McCarthy

  • The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples.

    Stefan J. Cano;Anne F. Klassen;Amie M. Scott;Peter G. Cordeiro

  • Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments

    Andrea L Pusic;Constance M Chen;Stefan Cano;Anne Klassen

  • Rectus Flap Reconstruction Decreases Perineal Wound Complications After Pelvic Chemoradiation and Surgery: A Cohort Study

    David B. Chessin;John Hartley;Alfred M. Cohen;Madhu Mazumdar

  • Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications.

    Anuja K. Antony;Colleen M. McCarthy;Peter G. Cordeiro;Babak J. Mehrara

  • A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after facial cosmetic surgery and/or nonsurgical facial rejuvenation.

    Tomasz R. Kosowski;Colleen McCarthy;Patrick L. Reavey;Amie M. Scott

  • Quality of life among breast cancer patients with lymphedema: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments and outcomes

    Andrea L. Pusic;Yeliz Cemal;Claudia Albornoz;Anne Klassen

  • Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement after cervical esophageal reconstruction with free jejunal transfer.

    Babak J. Mehrara;Ashwin Chunilal;Duc Bui;Joseph J. Disa

  • Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: Outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients

    P. G. Cordeiro;A. L. Pusic;J. J. Disa;B. McCormick

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea L. Pusic
Andrea L. Pusic Brigham and Women's Hospital
Babak J. Mehrara
Babak J. Mehrara Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Monica Morrow
Monica Morrow Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Ahmet Dogan
Ahmet Dogan Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jatin P. Shah
Jatin P. Shah Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Simon N. Powell
Simon N. Powell Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Clifford A. Hudis
Clifford A. Hudis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Dennis H. Kraus
Dennis H. Kraus Northwell Health
Kimberly J. Van Zee
Kimberly J. Van Zee Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Snehal G. Patel
Snehal G. Patel Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right path in healthcare is crucial, especially as online education options expand. Many students starting their journey may explore fast lpn program options to quickly enter the nursing field. These programs can lead to rewarding frontline healthcare roles and often provide flexible schedules.

For registered nurses looking to advance their education without extra in-person requirements, online rn to bsn programs no clinicals are available. These online programs allow active nurses to earn a BSN while continuing to work.

Those aiming for leadership or educator roles may consider the next step with graduate degrees. accelerated msn to dnp programs enable experienced nurses to quickly move from a Master’s to a Doctor of Nursing Practice. If speed is essential, students might pursue a 1 year dnp program online for a faster transition to top-level positions.

These pathways show how online degrees can open doors in healthcare for students at every stage, from entry-level to advanced practice and leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Peter G. Cordeiro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles