World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ed F. Deprettere

Ed F. Deprettere

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
6775
World Ranking
9307
National Ranking
167

Ed F. Deprettere publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ed F. Deprettere sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 223 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ed F. Deprettere D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ed F. Deprettere sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Programming language
  • Algorithm
  • Algebra

His primary areas of investigation include Computer architecture, Signal processing, Design space exploration, Embedded system and Electronic system-level design and verification. His Computer architecture research includes themes of Database-centric architecture and Kahn process networks. His study in Kahn process networks is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both MATLAB and Process.

His work carried out in the field of Signal processing brings together such families of science as Algorithm, Speech recognition, Sensor array and Computer engineering. When carried out as part of a general Algorithm research project, his work on Estimation theory is frequently linked to work in Azimuth, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study. His work on System on a chip and Field-programmable gate array is typically connected to Abstraction as part of general Embedded system study, connecting several disciplines of science.

His most cited work include:

  • Subspace-based signal analysis using singular value decomposition (292 citations)
  • An approach for quantitative analysis of application-specific dataflow architectures (225 citations)
  • A methodology for architecture exploration of heterogeneous signal processing systems (194 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Parallel computing, Algorithm, Signal processing, Very-large-scale integration and Embedded system. His Parallel computing research integrates issues from Model of computation, Process and Compiler. His studies deal with areas such as Theoretical computer science and Mathematical optimization as well as Algorithm.

His work deals with themes such as Adaptive filter, Sensor array and Computer engineering, which intersect with Signal processing. His Embedded system research incorporates elements of Systems design and Computer architecture. Ed F. Deprettere has researched Computer architecture in several fields, including Multiprocessing, Reconfigurable computing and Design space exploration.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Parallel computing (29.71%)
  • Algorithm (28.00%)
  • Signal processing (17.14%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2002-2018)?

  • Embedded system (16.00%)
  • Computer architecture (13.71%)
  • Field-programmable gate array (8.00%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Ed F. Deprettere mostly deals with Embedded system, Computer architecture, Field-programmable gate array, Parallel computing and Kahn process networks. His Embedded system research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Multiprocessing, MATLAB, Systems design and Signal processing. His Multiprocessing research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Electronic system-level design and verification, Design space exploration and Design flow.

His work deals with themes such as External memory interface, Reconfigurable computing, Systolic array and Set, which intersect with Computer architecture. He combines subjects such as Digital signal processing, Process and Executable with his study of Field-programmable gate array. His work carried out in the field of Parallel computing brings together such families of science as Model of computation, High-level synthesis and Compiler.

Between 2002 and 2018, his most popular works were:

  • System Design Using Kahn Process Networks: The Compaan/Laura Approach (177 citations)
  • Analysis of joint angle-frequency estimation using ESPRIT (160 citations)
  • Daedalus: toward composable multimedia MP-SoC design (109 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Programming language
  • Algorithm
  • Algebra

His primary scientific interests are in Embedded system, Multiprocessing, Computer architecture, Kahn process networks and Model of computation. His studies examine the connections between Multiprocessing and genetics, as well as such issues in Electronic system-level design and verification, with regards to Design specification. As a part of the same scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Computer architecture, focusing on Systems design and, on occasion, Application software.

His studies deal with areas such as Compiler, Overhead and Parallel computing as well as Model of computation. Ed F. Deprettere focuses mostly in the field of Process, narrowing it down to topics relating to Microprocessor and, in certain cases, Signal processing. His Signal processing study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Algorithm, Estimation theory and Mathematical optimization.

Best Publications

  • Subspace-based signal analysis using singular value decomposition

    A.-J. Van Der Veen;E.F. Deprettere;A.L. Swindlehurst

  • An approach for quantitative analysis of application-specific dataflow architectures

    B. Kienhuis;E. Deprettere;K. Vissers;P. Van Der Wolf

  • A methodology for architecture exploration of heterogeneous signal processing systems

    P. Lieverse;P. van der Wolf;E. Deprettere;K. Vissers

  • Analysis of joint angle-frequency estimation using ESPRIT

    A.N. Lemma;A.-J. van der Veen;E.F. Deprettere

  • System Design Using Kahn Process Networks: The Compaan/Laura Approach

    Todor Stefanov;Claudiu Zissulescu;Alexandru Turjan;Bart Kienhuis

  • A Methodology to Design Programmable Embedded Systems

    Bart Kienhuis;Ed F. Deprettere;Pieter van der Wolf;Kees Vissers

  • Compaan: deriving process networks from Matlab for embedded signal processing architectures

    Bart Kienhuis;Edwin Rijpkema;Ed Deprettere

  • Azimuth and elevation computation in high resolution DOA estimation

    A.J. van der Veen;P.B. Ober;E.F. Deprettere

  • Handbook of Signal Processing Systems

    Shuvra S. Bhattacharyya;Ed F. Deprettere;Rainer Leupers;Jarmo Takala

  • Daedalus: toward composable multimedia MP-SoC design

    H. Nikolov;M. Thompson;T. Stefanov;A. Pimentel

  • Systematic and Automated Multiprocessor System Design, Programming, and Implementation

    H. Nikolov;T. Stefanov;E. Deprettere

  • A methodology to design programmble embedded systems: the Y-chart approach

    Bart Kienhuis;Ed F. Deprettere;Pieter van der Wolf;Kees A. Vissers

  • A framework for rapid system-level exploration, synthesis, and programming of multimedia MP-SoCs

    Mark Thompson;Hristo Nikolov;Todor Stefanov;Andy D. Pimentel

  • Joint angle-frequency estimation using multi-resolution ESPRIT

    A.N. Lemma;A.-J. van der Veen;E.F. Deprettere

  • Multi-processor system design with ESPAM

    Hristo Nikolov;Todor Stefanov;Ed Deprettere

  • System level design with spade: an M-JPEG case study

    Paul Lieverse;Todor Stefanov;Pieter van der Wolf;Ed Deprettere

  • Algorithmic transformation techniques for efficient exploration of alternative application instances

    Todor Stefanov;Bart Kienhuis;Ed Deprettere

  • Laura: Leiden architecture research and exploration tool

    Claudiu Zissulescu;Todor Stefanov;Bart Kienhuis;Ed Deprettere

  • A design methodology for fixed-size systolic arrays

    J. Bu;E.F. Deprettere;P. Dewilde

  • Robust exponential modeling of audio signals

    J. Nieuwenhuijse;R. Heusens;Ed.F. Deprettere

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Moonen
Marc Moonen KU Leuven
Shuvra S. Bhattacharyya
Shuvra S. Bhattacharyya University of Maryland, College Park
Lothar Thiele
Lothar Thiele ETH Zurich
Stamatis Vassiliadis
Stamatis Vassiliadis Delft University of Technology
Keshab K. Parhi
Keshab K. Parhi University of Minnesota
W. Bastiaan Kleijn
W. Bastiaan Kleijn Victoria University of Wellington
Jürgen Teich
Jürgen Teich University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Alle-Jan van der Veen
Alle-Jan van der Veen Delft University of Technology
Amir Leshem
Amir Leshem Bar-Ilan University
Jan M. Rabaey
Jan M. Rabaey University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in computer science offers flexibility and accessibility for a wide range of learners. Many students start with an associate's degree online, which can provide foundational skills and a pathway to further education or entry-level tech jobs. For those considering advanced education, it's important to ask, what masters program should I do to maximize career prospects? Specialized master's programs in areas like data science or cybersecurity can open doors to higher salaries and leadership roles.

Affordability is another key concern. Students seeking budget-friendly options may wish to consider cheap online colleges to minimize student debt while gaining a recognized qualification. Navigating admissions can also be challenging, especially for those with academic setbacks. If you worry about your academic record, you can research the will grad schools accept low gpa topic to find supportive programs with flexible requirements.

Ultimately, a variety of online degree options cater to different career paths and academic backgrounds, making it easier than ever to enter or advance in the computer science field.

Best Scientists Citing Ed F. Deprettere

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles