World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 42 7611 7022 3276 2961 83 7798

Silvina G. Horovitz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Silvina G. Horovitz between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Silvina G. Horovitz published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2012. 11 of the 98 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2012. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 5 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 7 publications
2001 2025

98 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Silvina G. Horovitz: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 2
2005 1
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 5
2010 2
2011 2
2012 12
2013 6
2014 3
2015 3
2016 8
2017 2
2018 3
2019 1
2020 5
2021 9
2022 10
2023 0
2024 4
2025 7
Total 98
Download as CSV

Silvina G. Horovitz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvina G. Horovitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 83 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 83
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Silvina G. Horovitz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvina G. Horovitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 42
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Silvina G. Horovitz is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a significant focus on the subfields of Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Psychosomatic disorders and their treatments
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Genetic neurodegenerative diseases
  • Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments
  • Advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications
  • Obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders

Horovitz has contributed to numerous publications, often appearing in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), NeuroImage Clinical, Neurology, Journal of Neurology, and Clinical Neurophysiology. Their recent papers include:

  • Deep phenotyping of post-infectious myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, 2024, Nature Communications
  • Neuroimaging in Functional Neurological Disorder: State of the Field and Research Agenda, 2021, NeuroImage Clinical
  • What have we really learned from functional connectivity in clinical populations?, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Effects of TPH2 gene variation and childhood trauma on the clinical and circuit-level phenotype of functional movement disorders, 2020, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Dynamics of Top-Down Control and Motor Networks in Parkinson's Disease, 2021, Movement Disorders

Their body of work notably includes collaboration with frequent co-authors such as Mark Hallett, Jacob A. Parker, Primavera A. Spagnolo, Patrick Bédard, and Patrick McGurrin.

Throughout their career, Horovitz has published extensively, with a substantial number of contributions focusing on the integration of neuroimaging techniques and clinical neurological research. The range of topics covered in their work reflects an interdisciplinary approach linking brain imaging, clinical neuroscience, and mental health studies.

Best Publications

  • Decoupling of the brain's default mode network during deep sleep

    Silvina G. Horovitz;Allen R. Braun;Walter S. Carr;Dante Picchioni

  • Low frequency BOLD fluctuations during resting wakefulness and light sleep: a simultaneous EEG-fMRI study.

    Silvina G. Horovitz;Masaki Fukunaga;Jacco A. de Zwart;Peter van Gelderen

  • Low Frequency Fluctuations in the Cardiac Rate as a Source of Variance in the Resting-State fMRI BOLD Signal

    Karin Shmueli;Peter van Gelderen;Jacco A. de Zwart;Silvina G. Horovitz

  • Large-amplitude, spatially correlated fluctuations in BOLD fMRI signals during extended rest and early sleep stages.

    Masaki Fukunaga;Silvina G. Horovitz;Peter van Gelderen;Jacco A. de Zwart

  • Alteration of brain default network in subacute phase of injury in concussed individuals: resting-state fMRI study.

    Brian Johnson;Kai Zhang;Silvina G. Horovitz

  • Sources of functional magnetic resonance imaging signal fluctuations in the human brain at rest: a 7 T study ☆

    Marta Bianciardi;Masaki Fukunaga;Peter van Gelderen;Silvina G. Horovitz

  • Meta-analysis of real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies using individual participant data: How is brain regulation mediated?

    Kirsten Emmert;Kirsten Emmert;Rotem Kopel;Rotem Kopel;James Samuel Sulzer;Annette B. Brühl;Annette B. Brühl

  • Impaired self-agency in functional movement disorders

    Unknown

  • Correlations and dissociations between BOLD signal and P300 amplitude in an auditory oddball task: a parametric approach to combining fMRI and ERP.

    Silvina G. Horovitz;Pawel Skudlarski;John C. Gore

  • Alteration of brain functional network at rest and in response to YMCA physical stress test in concussed athletes: RsFMRI study.

    Semyon Slobounov;Kai Zhang;Brian Johnson

  • Modulation of spontaneous fMRI activity in human visual cortex by behavioral state

    Marta Bianciardi;Masaki Fukunaga;Peter van Gelderen;Silvina G. Horovitz

  • Parametric design and correlational analyses help integrating fMRI and electrophysiological data during face processing.

    Silvina G Horovitz;Bruno Rossion;Pawel Skudlarski;John C Gore

  • Neuroimaging in Functional Neurological Disorder: State of the Field and Research Agenda.

    David L Perez;Timothy R Nicholson;Ali A Asadi-Pooya;Indrit Bègue

  • Rhythmic alternating patterns of brain activity distinguish rapid eye movement sleep from other states of consciousness

    Ho Ming Chow;Silvina G. Horovitz;Walter S. Carr;Dante Picchioni

  • Sleep and the functional connectome.

    Dante Picchioni;Jeff H. Duyn;Silvina G. Horovitz

  • Self-modulation of primary motor cortex activity with motor and motor imagery tasks using real-time fMRI-based neurofeedback

    Brian D. Berman;Silvina G. Horovitz;Gaurav Venkataraman;Mark Hallett

  • Tractography patterns of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation

    Nora Vanegas-Arroyave;Peter M. Lauro;Ling Huang;Mark Hallett

  • Metabolic Origin of Bold Signal Fluctuations in the Absence of Stimuli

    Masaki Fukunaga;Silvina G Horovitz;Jacco A de Zwart;Peter van Gelderen

  • Simultaneous recording of event-related auditory oddball response using transcranial near infrared optical topography and surface EEG.

    Richard P. Kennan;Silvina G. Horovitz;Atsushi Maki;Yuichi Yamashita

  • What have we really learned from functional connectivity in clinical populations

    Jiahe Zhang;Aaron Kucyi;Jovicarole Raya;Ashley N. Nielsen

  • Decreased connectivity between the thalamus and the neocortex during human nonrapid eye movement sleep.

    Dante Picchioni;Morgan L Pixa;Masaki Fukunaga;Walter S Carr

  • Role of the right dorsal anterior insula in the urge to tic in Tourette syndrome.

    Sule Tinaz;Patrick Malone;Mark Hallett;Silvina G. Horovitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Hallett
Mark Hallett National Institutes of Health
Masaki Fukunaga
Masaki Fukunaga National Institutes of Natural Sciences
Jeff H. Duyn
Jeff H. Duyn National Institutes of Health
Jacco A. de Zwart
Jacco A. de Zwart National Institutes of Health
Allen R. Braun
Allen R. Braun Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Thomas J. Balkin
Thomas J. Balkin Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Semyon Slobounov
Semyon Slobounov Pennsylvania State University
Brian Berman
Brian Berman Virginia Commonwealth University
Barry Horwitz
Barry Horwitz National Institutes of Health
Brian F. G. Johnson
Brian F. G. Johnson University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA can open up a variety of academic and professional opportunities. Many students explore related fields such as social work, psychology, and counseling to broaden their knowledge and career prospects.

For those interested in helping individuals and communities, exploring msw programs can be a strong complement to neuroscience studies. These programs prepare graduates for roles in mental health, therapy, and advocacy settings.

If you’re looking to advance your education quickly, consider an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology. This can help build a solid foundation in behavioral science and research, making it easier to transition into graduate neuroscience or psychology programs.

For career paths in counseling, it’s important to look for cacrep-accredited programs online. Accreditation ensures the quality of the curriculum and meets requirements for licensure, which is crucial for clinical roles.

Finally, if cost is a concern, there are many masters in counseling programs available online that offer affordability without sacrificing educational rigor. Exploring these related pathways can help you tailor your neuroscience education to fit your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Silvina G. Horovitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles