World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
Argentina
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 60 3811 3486 7 6 170 14547

Enzo Tagliazucchi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Enzo Tagliazucchi between 2010 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Enzo Tagliazucchi published across 17 years, from 2010 to 2026, averaging 15.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2025. 39 of the 266 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2025. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 38 publications 2026: 1 publication
2010 2026

266 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Enzo Tagliazucchi: publications per year, 2010 to 2026
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 5
2012 7
2013 11
2014 8
2015 6
2016 13
2017 10
2018 10
2019 15
2020 18
2021 27
2022 33
2023 34
2024 29
2025 38
2026 1
Total 266
Download as CSV

Enzo Tagliazucchi publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enzo Tagliazucchi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 170 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383 170
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Enzo Tagliazucchi D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enzo Tagliazucchi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328 60
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in Argentina Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in Argentina Leader Award

Overview

Enzo Tagliazucchi is affiliated with the University of Buenos Aires in Argentina. Their research predominantly focuses on neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience

Within this broader domain, Tagliazucchi's work engages deeply with several subfields, such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

The primary research topics covered in their publications reveal a focus on brain connectivity and dynamics, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Chemical synthesis and alkaloids

Tagliazucchi has contributed extensively to the scientific literature, with key recent papers including:

  • "Human brain effects of DMT assessed via EEG-fMRI", 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Microdosing with psilocybin mushrooms: a double-blind placebo-controlled study", 2022, Translational Psychiatry
  • "Meditation Increases the Entropy of Brain Oscillatory Activity", 2020, Neuroscience
  • "Toward naturalistic neuroscience: Mechanisms underlying the flattening of brain hierarchy in movie-watching compared to rest and task", 2023, Science Advances
  • "Genuine high-order interactions in brain networks and neurodegeneration", 2022, Neurobiology of Disease

Their research frequently appears in publication venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Communications Biology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Tagliazucchi collaborates regularly with multiple coauthors, with notable frequent collaborators being:

  • Yonatan Sanz Perl
  • Gustavo Deco
  • Morten L. Kringelbach
  • Agustín Ibáñez
  • Carla Pallavicini

Best Publications

  • The entropic brain: a theory of conscious states informed by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs

    Robin Lester Carhart-Harris;Robert Leech;Peter John Hellyer;Murray Shanahan

  • Neural correlates of the LSD experience revealed by multimodal neuroimaging

    Robin L. Carhart-Harris;Suresh D. Muthukumaraswamy;Suresh D. Muthukumaraswamy;Leor Roseman;Mendel Kaelen

  • Criticality in large-scale brain FMRI dynamics unveiled by a novel point process analysis.

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Enzo Tagliazucchi;Pablo Balenzuela;Pablo Balenzuela;Daniel Fraiman;Daniel Fraiman;Dante R. Chialvo;Dante R. Chialvo

  • Decoding Wakefulness Levels from Typical fMRI Resting-State Data Reveals Reliable Drifts between Wakefulness and Sleep

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Helmut Laufs;Helmut Laufs

  • On the Stability of BOLD fMRI Correlations

    Timothy O. Laumann;Abraham Z. Snyder;Anish Mitra;Evan M. Gordon

  • Increased Global Functional Connectivity Correlates with LSD-Induced Ego Dissolution

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Enzo Tagliazucchi;Leor Roseman;Mendel Kaelen;Csaba Orban

  • Human consciousness is supported by dynamic complex patterns of brain signal coordination

    Athena Demertzi;Athena Demertzi;Enzo Tagliazucchi;Stanislas Dehaene;Stanislas Dehaene;Gustavo Deco

  • Brain organization into resting state networks emerges at criticality on a model of the human connectome

    Ariel Haimovici;Enzo Rodolfo Tagliazucchi;Pablo Balenzuela;Dante Renato Chialvo;Dante Renato Chialvo

  • Enhanced repertoire of brain dynamical states during the psychedelic experience

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Robin Carhart-Harris;Robert Leech;David Nutt

  • Dynamic BOLD functional connectivity in humans and its electrophysiological correlates.

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Frederic von Wegner;Astrid Morzelewski;Verena Brodbeck

  • EEG microstates of wakefulness and NREM sleep.

    Verena Brodbeck;Alena Kuhn;Frederic von Wegner;Astrid Morzelewski

  • Breakdown of long-range temporal dependence in default mode and attention networks during deep sleep

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Frederic von Wegner;Astrid Morzelewski;Verena Brodbeck

  • Awakening: Predicting external stimulation to force transitions between different brain states.

    Gustavo Deco;Josephine Cruzat;Joana Cabral;Joana Cabral;Joana Cabral;Enzo Tagliazucchi

  • Discovery of key whole-brain transitions and dynamics during human wakefulness and non-REM sleep.

    A. B. A. Stevner;A. B. A. Stevner;D. Vidaurre;J. Cabral;J. Cabral;K. Rapuano

  • Brain resting state is disrupted in chronic back pain patients.

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Pablo Balenzuela;Pablo Balenzuela;Daniel Fraiman;Daniel Fraiman;Dante R. Chialvo;Dante R. Chialvo;Dante R. Chialvo

  • Human brain effects of DMT assessed via EEG-fMRI

    Unknown

  • Large-scale signatures of unconsciousness are consistent with a departure from critical dynamics

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Dante R. Chialvo;Michael Siniatchkin;Enrico Amico

  • Automatic sleep staging using fMRI functional connectivity data

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Frederic von Wegner;Astrid Morzelewski;Sergey Borisov

  • Dynamic functional connectivity and brain metastability during altered states of consciousness.

    Federico Cavanna;Martina G. Vilas;Matías Palmucci;Enzo Tagliazucchi

  • Working memory performance of early MS patients correlates inversely with modularity increases in resting state functional connectivity networks.

    O.L. Gamboa;E. Tagliazucchi;F. von Wegner;A. Jurcoane

  • Human cortical–hippocampal dialogue in wake and slow-wave sleep

    Anish Mitra;Abraham Z. Snyder;Carl D. Hacker;Mrinal Pahwa

  • A Viewpoint on: Brain Organization into Resting State Networks Emerges at Criticality on a Model of the Human Connectome

    Dietmar Plenz;Ariel Haimovici;Enzo Tagliazucchi;Pablo Balenzuela

  • Large-scale signatures of unconsciousness are consistent with a departure from critical dynamics

    Enzo Tagliazucchi;Dante R. Chialvo;Michael Siniatchkin;Jean-Francois Brichant

Frequent Co-Authors

Helmut Laufs
Helmut Laufs Kiel University
Morten L. Kringelbach
Morten L. Kringelbach University of Oxford
Gustavo Deco
Gustavo Deco Pompeu Fabra University
Steven Laureys
Steven Laureys University of Liège
Robin L. Carhart-Harris
Robin L. Carhart-Harris University of California, San Francisco
Agustín Ibáñez
Agustín Ibáñez Adolfo Ibáñez University
David J. Nutt
David J. Nutt Imperial College London
Marcus E. Raichle
Marcus E. Raichle Washington University in St. Louis
Edward T. Bullmore
Edward T. Bullmore King's College London
Adolfo M. García
Adolfo M. García University of San Andrés

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Enzo Tagliazucchi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles