World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeff Richardson

Jeff Richardson

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
56
Citations
11516
World Ranking
1903
National Ranking
141

Jeff Richardson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff Richardson sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 286 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jeff Richardson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff Richardson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeff Richardson is affiliated with Monash University in Australia and specializes in the field of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, with a focus on economic evaluations within health systems.

Their work spans several subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Oncology, and Speech and Hearing. This interdisciplinary approach informs research on health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Jeff Richardson include:

  • Valuation of Treatments for Rare Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review of Societal Preference Studies (2022) published in Advances in Therapy
  • Measuring the Wellbeing of Cancer Patients with Generic and Disease-Specific Instruments (2023) published in Cancers
  • Assessing Outcomes for Cost-Utility Analysis in Children and Adolescents With Mental Health Problems: Are Multiattribute Utility Instruments Fit for Purpose? (2022) published in Value in Health
  • It's time to refocus support for MH programs that work (2021) published in Mental Health Weekly
  • ICEpop CAPability Measure for Adults--German Version (2020) published in PsycTESTS Dataset

Jeff Richardson collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Michael Schlander (3 joint publications)
  • Gang Chen (2 joint publications)
  • Omar Dabbous
  • L Chachoua
  • Samuel Aballéa

Publications are often featured in notable venues such as Value in Health, PsycTESTS Dataset, Advances in Therapy, Cancers, and Mental Health Weekly.

The primary research topics encompass:

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

This body of work contributes to a deeper understanding of economic evaluation methods applied to various healthcare contexts, especially in rare diseases, mental health programs, and cancer care. The blend of economic theory and health-focused research characterizes their scholarly output.

Best Publications

  • The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of Health-Related Quality of Life

    Graeme Hawthorne;Jeff Richardson;Richard Harry Osborne

  • A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments

    Graeme Hawthorne;Jeff Richardson;Neil Atherton Day

  • Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes.

    Erik Nord;Jose Luis Pinto;Jeff Richardson;Paul Menzel

  • Validity and Reliability of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument

    Jeffrey Ralph James Richardson;Angelo Anthony Iezzi;Munir Ahmed Khan;Aimee Maxwell

  • The rule of rescue

    John Mckie;Jeff R J Richardson

  • Cost utility analysis: What should be measured?

    J. Richardson

  • Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism: An Australian survey of health issues

    Erik Nord;Jeff Richardson;Andrew Street;Helga Kuhse

  • The role of adaptation to disability and disease in health state valuation: a preliminary normative analysis

    Paul Menzel;Paul Dolan;Jeff R J Richardson;Jan A Olsen

  • Toward a broader view of values in cost-effectiveness analysis of health.

    Paul Menzel;Marthe R. Gold;Erik Nord;Jose-Louis Pinto-Prades

  • An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health.

    Paul Dolan;Paul Dolan;Jan Abel Olsen;Jan Abel Olsen;Paul Menzel;Jeffrey Ralph James Richardson

  • Comparing and Explaining Differences in the Magnitude, Content, and Sensitivity of Utilities Predicted by the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D, QWB, and AQoL-8D Multiattribute Utility Instruments

    Jeffrey Ralph James Richardson;Munir Ahmed Khan;Angelo Anthony Iezzi;Aimee Maxwell

  • Double jeopardy and the use of QALYs in health care allocation.

    P Singer;J McKie;H Kuhse;J Richardson

  • Construction of the descriptive system for the Assessment of Quality of Life AQoL-6D utility instrument.

    Jeffrey Ralph James Richardson;Stuart James Peacock;Stuart James Peacock;Graeme Hawthorne;Angelo Anthony Iezzi

  • Who cares about cost? Does economic analysis impose or reflect social values?

    Erik Nord;Jeff Richardson;Andrew Street;Helga Kuhse

  • Population norms for the AQoL derived from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing

    Graeme Hawthorne;Sam Korn;Jeffrey Ralph James Richardson

  • A cost utility analysis of mammography screening in Australia.

    Jane Hall;Karen Gerard;Glenn Salkeld;Jeff Richardson

  • Social evaluation of health care versus personal evaluation of health states evidence on the validity of four health-state scaling instruments using norwegian and australian surveys

    Erik Nord;Jeff Richardson;Kelly Macarounas-Kirchmann

  • Deriving population norms for the AQoL-6D and AQoL-8D multi-attribute utility instruments from web-based data.

    Aimee Maxwell;Mehmet Ozmen;Angelo Iezzi;Jeffrey Richardson

  • Measurement of the quality of life for economic evaluation and the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) Mark 2 instrument

    Jeffrey Ralph James Richardson;Neil Atherton Day;Stuart James Peacock;Angelo Anthony Iezzi

  • Vision and quality of life: the development of a utility measure.

    RoseAnne Misajon;Graeme Hawthorne;Jeffrey Ralph James Richardson;Jodi Barton

  • The significance of age and duration of effect in social evaluation of health care.

    Erik Nord;Andrew Street;Jeff Richardson;Helga Kuhse

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart Peacock
Stuart Peacock Simon Fraser University
Erik Nord
Erik Nord Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Jan Abel Olsen
Jan Abel Olsen University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Peter A. Singer
Peter A. Singer National University of Singapore
Joanna Coast
Joanna Coast University of Bristol
Maarten J. Postma
Maarten J. Postma University of Groningen
Peter A. Ubel
Peter A. Ubel Duke University
Richard Smith
Richard Smith University of Exeter
Andrew Street
Andrew Street London School of Economics and Political Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide array of meaningful careers, especially with the rise of accredited online programs. For those pursuing clinical mental health roles, there are online psych d programs that prepare graduates for licensure and advanced practice. Alternatively, those interested in marriage and family therapy can benefit from flexible mft programs online, allowing for swift entry into this in-demand field.

Flexibility and affordability remain key issues for adult learners, and many choose to pursue a masters in psychology online to enhance credentials without overwhelming debt. Additionally, professionals looking to advance in leadership or academia may be interested in the easiest edd programs, which offer fast-track options to a Doctor of Education.

Online degrees make it possible to balance study with work and personal commitments. By choosing the right program, students can gain specialized skills for careers in counseling, therapy, education, research, and beyond—while benefiting from both flexibility and rigorous academic standards.

Best Scientists Citing Jeff Richardson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles