World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 58 1676 1505 94 87 196 10905

Stirling Bryan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stirling Bryan between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stirling Bryan published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2016. 22 of the 268 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2016. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 12 publications
1991 2025

268 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stirling Bryan: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 7
2003 4
2004 4
2005 5
2006 9
2007 15
2008 7
2009 11
2010 11
2011 8
2012 13
2013 12
2014 19
2015 14
2016 20
2017 18
2018 10
2019 8
2020 6
2021 8
2022 10
2023 19
2024 10
2025 12
Total 268
Download as CSV

Stirling Bryan publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stirling Bryan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 196 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 196
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Stirling Bryan D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stirling Bryan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95 58
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Stirling Bryan is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and has contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine, Economics, Econometrics and Finance, and Health Professions. Their research spans several subfields including Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, and Pharmacology.

Their work addresses diverse topics such as Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life; Healthcare Policy and Management; Health Policy Implementation Science; Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments; Mental Health and Patient Involvement; Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism; and Chronic Disease Management Strategies.

Recent publications by Stirling Bryan include:

  • Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review, 2020, Patient
  • Describing practices of priority setting and resource allocation in publicly funded health care systems of high-income countries, 2021, BMC Health Services Research
  • Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided treatment for major depression, 2023, Canadian Medical Association Journal
  • Canada population norms for the EQ-5D-5L, 2023, The European Journal of Health Economics
  • Evaluating treatment outcomes in pharmacogenomic-guided care for major depression: A rapid review and meta-analysis, 2023, Psychiatry Research

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Patient
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
  • PharmacoEconomics

Stirling Bryan has collaborated regularly with several researchers, including Louisa Edwards, Jehannine Austin, Mary Bunka, Alison M. Hoens, and Mohsen Sadatsafavi. These co-authors have contributed to advancing research topics consistent with Bryan's main areas of focus.

Best Publications

  • A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in people aged 65 and over. The SAFE study.

    Fdr Hobbs;DA Fitzmaurice;Jonathan Mant;E Murray

  • A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.

    Yen-Fu Chen;Paresh Jobanputra;Pelham Barton;Susan Jowett

  • Effect of Self-monitoring and Medication Self-titration on Systolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: The TASMIN-SR Randomized Clinical Trial

    Richard J. McManus;Jonathan Mant;M. Sayeed Haque;Emma P. Bray

  • A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada.

    Feng Xie;Eleanor Pullenayegum;Kathy Gaebel;Nick Bansback

  • Modelling in the economic evaluation of health care: selecting the appropriate approach

    Unknown

  • Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: A systematic review.

    Samantha Pollard;Nick Bansback;Stirling Bryan

  • Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening methods in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

    Alex K. Mezei;Heather L. Armstrong;Heather N. Pedersen;Nicole G. Campos

  • An empirical comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D in liver transplant patients.

    Unknown

  • Patients' preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: discrete choice experiment

    Mark Sculpher;Stirling Bryan;Pat Fry;Patricia de Winter

  • EQ-5D in Patients With Dementia An Investigation of Inter-Rater Agreement

    Unknown

  • Cost-effectiveness in clinical trials: using multiple imputation to deal with incomplete cost data

    Unknown

  • Do patients value continuity of care in general practice? An investigation using stated preference discrete choice experiments

    David A. Turner;Carolyn Clare Tarrant;Kate C. Windridge;Stirling Bryan

  • The use of economic evaluations in NHS decision-making: a review and empirical investigation.

    Unknown

  • An investigation of the construct validity of the ICECAP-A capability measure

    Hareth Al-Janabi;Tim J. Peters;John Brazier;Stirling Bryan

  • Preference measurement using conjoint methods: an empirical investigation of reliability.

    Stirling Bryan;Lisa Gold;Rob Sheldon;Martin Buxton

  • Discrete choice experiments in health economics. For better or for worse

    Stirling Bryan;Paul Dolan

  • Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life Pre- and Post- Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Multicenter Study

    Julie Ratcliffe;Louise Longworth;Tracey Young;Stirling Bryan

  • Understanding the limited impact of economic evaluation in health care resource allocation: a conceptual framework.

    Unknown

  • Mobility predicts change in older adults’ health-related quality of life: evidence from a Vancouver falls prevention prospective cohort study

    Jennifer C. Davis;Stirling Bryan;John R. Best;Linda C. Li

  • Seeing the NICE side of cost-effectiveness analysis: a qualitative investigation of the use of CEA in NICE technology appraisals.

    Unknown

  • A comparison of the ICECAP-O with EQ-5D in a falls prevention clinical setting: are they complements or substitutes?

    Jennifer C. Davis;Teresa Liu-Ambrose;Chris G. Richardson;Chris G. Richardson;Stirling Bryan

  • Toward a 21st-century health care system: Recommendations for health care reform

    Kenneth Arrow;Alan Auerbach;John Bertko;Shannon Brownlee

  • Exploring the cost–utility of stratified primary care management for low back pain compared with current best practice within risk-defined subgroups

    David G T Whitehurst;David G T Whitehurst;David G T Whitehurst;Stirling Bryan;Stirling Bryan;Martyn Lewis;Jonathan Hill

  • Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): a cost-effectiveness analysis

    Billingsley Kaambwa;Stirling Bryan;Sue Jowett;Jonathan Mant

  • Let's All Go to the PROM: The Case for Routine Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Canadian Healthcare

    Kimberlyn McGrail;Stirling Bryan;Jennifer Davis

  • Mobility and cognition are associated with wellbeing and health related quality of life among older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the Vancouver Falls Prevention Cohort

    Jennifer C. Davis;Jennifer C. Davis;Stirling Bryan;Stirling Bryan;Linda C. Li;Linda C. Li;John R. Best

  • Midterm cost‐effectiveness of the liver transplantation program of England and Wales for three disease groups

    Louise Longworth;Tracey Young;Martin J. Buxton;Julie Ratcliffe

  • 2014 Consensus Statement from the first Economics of Physical Inactivity Consensus (EPIC) Conference (Vancouver)

    Jennifer C Davis;Evert Verhagen;Stirling Bryan;Teresa Liu-Ambrose

  • Rapid testing for group B streptococcus during labour: a test accuracy study with evaluation of acceptability and cost-effectiveness.

    J. Daniels;J. Gray;Helen M. Pattison;T. Roberts

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig Mitton
Craig Mitton University of British Columbia
Teresa Liu-Ambrose
Teresa Liu-Ambrose University of British Columbia
Marcel F. Dvorak
Marcel F. Dvorak University of British Columbia
Karim M. Khan
Karim M. Khan University of British Columbia
Richard J McManus
Richard J McManus University of Oxford
Bryan Williams
Bryan Williams University College London
Paul Little
Paul Little University of Southampton
Cam Donaldson
Cam Donaldson Glasgow Caledonian University
Stuart Peacock
Stuart Peacock Simon Fraser University
Rollin Brant
Rollin Brant University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to many rewarding online degree options. Students interested in psychology or mental health careers can consider accredited online psyd programs to pursue advanced practice as clinical psychologists in a flexible format. Those who want to become marriage and family therapists quickly may benefit from accelerated online mft programs designed to fast-track the journey into professional counseling.

Financial planning is also key when considering further education. If you are curious about expenses, learn more about how much does a masters in psychology cost to make informed decisions. For educators and social science professionals seeking leadership roles, edd programs offer a pathway to doctoral-level credentials, sometimes with expedited timelines.

Whether you prioritize affordability, speed, or specialized training, the expanding range of online social science degrees provides multiple career pathways suited to your goals and needs.

Best Scientists Citing Stirling Bryan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles