World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hayden B. Bosworth

Hayden B. Bosworth

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11753 11056 6028 5580 611 30359

Hayden B. Bosworth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hayden B. Bosworth between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hayden B. Bosworth published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 22.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2024. 91 of the 671 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2024. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 36 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 38 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 57 publications 2025: 34 publications
1996 2025

671 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hayden B. Bosworth: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 3
1999 6
2000 11
2001 6
2002 18
2003 13
2004 17
2005 36
2006 14
2007 10
2008 17
2009 19
2010 20
2011 19
2012 24
2013 27
2014 32
2015 34
2016 26
2017 30
2018 36
2019 34
2020 38
2021 31
2022 24
2023 33
2024 57
2025 34
Total 671
Download as CSV

Hayden B. Bosworth publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hayden B. Bosworth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 611 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 611
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Hayden B. Bosworth D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hayden B. Bosworth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Hayden B. Bosworth is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Epidemiology.

Their work addresses multiple topics such as:

  • Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Hayden B. Bosworth has published extensively across various journals and institutions. Frequent publication venues include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Circulation

Collaborations form a significant part of their research activity. Regular co-authors include Leah L. Zullig, Allison A. Lewinski, Matthew J. Crowley, Cynthia J. Coffman, and Valerie A. Smith.

Among the recent papers featuring Hayden B. Bosworth's contributions are:

  • Effective health communication - a key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic (2020, Patient Education and Counseling)
  • Evidence and Recommendations on the Use of Telemedicine for the Management of Arterial Hypertension (2020, Hypertension)
  • Applied Rapid Qualitative Analysis to Develop a Contextually Appropriate Intervention and Increase the Likelihood of Uptake (2021, Medical Care)
  • Understanding Telemedicine's "New Normal": Variations in Telemedicine Use by Specialty Line and Patient Demographics (2021, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health)
  • An Adaptable Framework for Factors Contributing to Medication Adherence: Results from a Systematic Review of 102 Conceptual Frameworks (2021, Journal of General Internal Medicine)

Hayden B. Bosworth received recognition as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2008.

Best Publications

  • Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison

    DC Rockey;E Paulson;D Niedzwiecki;W Davis

  • Characteristics of socially isolated patients with coronary artery disease who are at elevated risk for mortality.

    Beverly H. Brummett;John C. Barefoot;Ilene C. Siegler;Nancy E. Clapp-Channing

  • Medication adherence: a call for action.

    Hayden B. Bosworth;Hayden B. Bosworth;Bradi B. Granger;Phil Mendys;Ralph Brindis

  • Self-monitoring of blood pressure in hypertension: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

    Katherine L. Tucker;James P. Sheppard;Richard Stevens;Hayden B. Bosworth

  • Reliability and validity of the SF-12 health survey among people with severe mental illness.

    Michelle P. Salyers;Hayden B. Bosworth;Jeffrey W. Swanson;Jerilynn Lamb-Pagone

  • Prevention and Control of Hypertension: JACC Health Promotion Series

    Robert M. Carey;Paul Muntner;Hayden B. Bosworth;Paul K. Whelton

  • Racial differences in blood pressure control: potential explanatory factors

    Hayden B. Bosworth;Hayden B. Bosworth;Tara Dudley;Maren K. Olsen;Maren K. Olsen;Corrine I. Voils;Corrine I. Voils

  • Effective health communication - a key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Arnstein Finset;Hayden Bosworth;Phyllis Butow;Pål Gulbrandsen

  • Caregiver burden and psychological distress in partners of veterans with chronic posttraumatic stress disorder

    Patrick S. Calhoun;Patrick S. Calhoun;Jean C. Beckham;Jean C. Beckham;Hayden B. Bosworth;Hayden B. Bosworth

  • Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing

    Elizabeth A. Hahn;Robert F. DeVellis;Rita K. Bode;Sofia F. Garcia

  • A Re-conceptualization of Access for 21st Century Healthcare

    John C. Fortney;James F. Burgess;James F. Burgess;Hayden B. Bosworth;Hayden B. Bosworth;Brenda M. Booth

  • The predictive value of self-report scales compared with physician diagnosis of depression in hemodialysis patients

    S.S. Hedayati;S.S. Hedayati;H.B. Bosworth;H.B. Bosworth;M. Kuchibhatla;P.L. Kimmel

  • Can This Patient Read and Understand Written Health Information

    Benjamin J. Powers;Jane V. Trinh;Hayden B. Bosworth

  • Death or hospitalization of patients on chronic hemodialysis is associated with a physician-based diagnosis of depression

    S. Susan Hedayati;S. Susan Hedayati;Hayden B. Bosworth;Hayden B. Bosworth;Libbie P. Briley;Richard J. Sloane

  • Depressive symptoms, menopausal status, and climacteric symptoms in women at midlife.

    Hayden B. Bosworth;Hayden B. Bosworth;Lori A. Bastian;Lori A. Bastian;Maggie N. Kuchibhatla;David C. Steffens

  • Two self-management interventions to improve hypertension control: a randomized trial.

    Hayden B. Bosworth;Maren K. Olsen;Janet M. Grubber;Alice M. Neary

  • Multifaceted intervention to improve medication adherence and secondary prevention measures after acute coronary syndrome hospital discharge: a randomized clinical trial.

    P. Michael Ho;Anne Lambert-Kerzner;Evan P. Carey;Ibrahim E. Fahdi

  • Intentional and Unintentional Nonadherence to Antihypertensive Medication

    Kathryn P Lowry;Tara K Dudley;Eugene Z Oddone;Hayden B Bosworth

  • “Are You at Peace?”: One Item to Probe Spiritual Concerns at the End of Life

    Karen E. Steinhauser;Corrine I. Voils;Elizabeth C. Clipp;Hayden B. Bosworth

  • Nurse administered telephone intervention for blood pressure control: a patient-tailored multifactorial intervention.

    Hayden B. Bosworth;Maren K. Olsen;Maren K. Olsen;Pam Gentry;Melinda Orr

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugene Z. Oddone
Eugene Z. Oddone Duke University
Corrine I. Voils
Corrine I. Voils University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ilene C. Siegler
Ilene C. Siegler Duke University
Morris Weinberger
Morris Weinberger University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Laura P. Svetkey
Laura P. Svetkey Duke University
Carl F. Pieper
Carl F. Pieper Duke University
Jean C. Beckham
Jean C. Beckham Duke University
David C. Steffens
David C. Steffens University of Connecticut
Patrick S. Calhoun
Patrick S. Calhoun Duke University
Gary G. Bennett
Gary G. Bennett Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to a career in medicine often includes a variety of educational paths, many of which can now be pursued online. For those who are already registered nurses looking to advance their credentials, there are flexible online rn-bsn programs without clinicals. These allow working nurses to complete their Bachelor of Science in Nursing without the need for additional hands-on clinical hours.

Higher-level nursing degrees are also gaining popularity online. If you're aiming for the highest level of clinical leadership, consider the shortest online dnp program options, which are designed to be completed in less time for eligible nurses. Additionally, some students may seek out a dnp program without clinical hours, making the path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice more accessible for those with demanding schedules.

Those just starting their healthcare journey may explore lpn online programs, which provide a quick entry point into nursing with the flexibility of distance learning. With these options, students can customize their pathway to a rewarding medical career while balancing other life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Hayden B. Bosworth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles