World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
49
Citations
11185
World Ranking
2916
National Ranking
1418

Mirta Galesic publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mirta Galesic sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 137 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mirta Galesic D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mirta Galesic sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mirta Galesic is affiliated with the Santa Fe Institute in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on social sciences and physics and astronomy. In particular, their work intersects areas such as statistical and nonlinear physics, sociology and political science, gender studies, artificial intelligence, and communication.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Mirta Galesic include:

  • Integrating social and cognitive aspects of belief dynamics: towards a unifying framework, 2021, Journal of The Royal Society Interface
  • Stewardship of global collective behavior, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • The unequal impact of parenthood in academia, 2021, Science Advances
  • Socioeconomic roots of academic faculty, 2022, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty, 2023, Science Advances

Frequent coauthors of Mirta Galesic include:

  • Henrik Olsson
  • Allison C. Morgan
  • Daniel B. Larremore
  • Aaron Clauset
  • Jean-Gabriel Young

Common publication venues for this scientist encompass:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Science Advances
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Best Publications

  • Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey

    Mirta Galesic;Michael Bosnjak

  • Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin numeracy test

    Edward T. Cokely;Mirta Galesic;Eric Schulz;Saima Ghazal

  • An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys

    Scott Fricker;Mirta Galesic;Roger Tourangeau;Ting Yan

  • Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers

    Lyndal J. Trevena;Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher;Adrian Edwards;Wolfgang Gaissmaier

  • Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks : Overcoming low numeracy

    Mirta Galesic;Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Gerd Gigerenzer

  • Graph Literacy: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

    Mirta Galesic;Rocio Garcia-Retamero

  • Personality determinants of online shopping : Explaining online purchase intentions using a hierarchical approach

    Michael Bosnjak;Mirta Galesic;Tracy Tuten

  • Who proficts from visual aids: Overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Mirta Galesic

  • Statistical numeracy for health : A cross-cultural comparison with probabilistic national samples

    Mirta Galesic;Rocio Garcia-Retamero

  • Eye-Tracking Data New Insights on Response Order Effects and Other Cognitive Shortcuts in Survey Responding

    Mirta Galesic;Roger Tourangeau;Roger Tourangeau;Mick P. Couper;Frederick G. Conrad

  • Stewardship of global collective behavior.

    Joseph B. Bak-Coleman;Mark Alfano;Mark Alfano;Wolfram Barfuss;Carl T. Bergstrom

  • The unequal impact of parenthood in academia

    Allison C. Morgan;Samuel F. Way;Michael J. D. Hoefer;Daniel B. Larremore

  • Do icon arrays help reduce denominator neglect

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Mirta Galesic;Gerd Gigerenzer

  • Communicating Treatment Risk Reduction to People With Low Numeracy Skills: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Mirta Galesic

  • How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health.

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Mirta Galesic

  • Social learning strategies modify the effect of network structure on group performance

    Daniel Barkoczi;Mirta Galesic

  • Natural Frequencies Help Older Adults and People with Low Numeracy to Evaluate Medical Screening Tests

    Mirta Galesic;Gerd Gigerenzer;Nils Straubinger

  • Homophily and minority-group size explain perception biases in social networks

    Eun Lee;Fariba Karimi;Claudia Wagner;Hang-Hyun Jo

  • Doc, what would you do if you were me? On self-other discrepancies in medical decision making.

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Mirta Galesic

  • Social Sampling Explains Apparent Biases in Judgments of Social Environments

    Mirta Galesic;Henrik Olsson;Jörg Rieskamp

  • Dropouts on the web: Effects of interest and burden experienced during an online survey

    Mirta Galesic

Frequent Co-Authors

Rocio Garcia-Retamero
Rocio Garcia-Retamero University of Granada
Gerd Gigerenzer
Gerd Gigerenzer Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Michael Bosnjak
Michael Bosnjak University of Trier
Roger Tourangeau
Roger Tourangeau Westat (United States)
Edward T. Cokely
Edward T. Cokely University of Oklahoma
Mick P. Couper
Mick P. Couper University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Isaac M. Lipkus
Isaac M. Lipkus Duke University
Lyndal Trevena
Lyndal Trevena University of Sydney
Ellen Peters
Ellen Peters University of Oregon
Adrian Edwards
Adrian Edwards Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in the social sciences and humanities opens the door to diverse and rewarding career options. Flexible programs make it possible for students to balance studies with work or family commitments, while affordable options help to minimize student debt.

Many students begin with the pursuit of a cheapest online psychology degree, which offers foundational knowledge for further study or entry-level positions in mental health, education, or research.

For those interested in advanced practice and helping professions, a masters in social work online provides pathways to clinical social work, community leadership, and advocacy roles.

Students aiming at clinical psychology careers may consider online psyd programs, focusing on hands-on clinical training and assessment skills. Similarly, the counseling field offers opportunities with mft online degrees, designed for those interested in marriage and family therapy.

Each of these online options allows for different levels of flexibility, affordability, and specialization—empowering learners to find the best fit for their career ambitions in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Mirta Galesic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles