World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
46
Citations
12935
World Ranking
3518
National Ranking
1695

Eleanor Singer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eleanor Singer sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 117 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Eleanor Singer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eleanor Singer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Eleanor Singer was affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research contributions primarily spanned the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with subfields including Hematology, Speech and Hearing, and Infectious Diseases.

Their work addressed several main topics, notably:

  • Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies

Among the documented papers, one is titled Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in pregnancy and the postpartum: A case series from the national HLH network published in 2025 in the journal Obstetric Medicine.

They frequently collaborated with the following researchers:

  • Bethan Goulden
  • Benjamin Bennett
  • Eman Elfar
  • Kazi M Fardeen
  • Ian Giles

Publication venues chiefly included Obstetric Medicine.

Eleanor Singer was recognized as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2008.

Best Publications

  • The Effects of Response Rate Changes on the Index of Consumer Sentiment

    Richard Curtin;Stanley Presser;Eleanor Singer

  • Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century

    Richard Curtin;Stanley Presser;Eleanor Singer

  • Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires

    Stanley Presser;Mick P. Couper;Judith T. Lessler;Elizabeth Martin

  • Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration.

    Robert M. Groves;Eleanor Singer;Amy Corning

  • The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys

    Unknown

  • Experiments with Incentives in Telephone Surveys

    Eleanor Singer;John Van Hoewyk;Mary P. Maher

  • Evaluating the Effectiveness of Visual Analog Scales

    Mick P. Couper;Roger Tourangeau;Frederick G. Conrad;Eleanor Singer

  • Experiments in Producing Nonresponse Bias

    Robert M. Groves;Mick P. Couper;Stanley Presser;Eleanor Singer

  • CONFIDENTIALITY ASSURANCES AND RESPONSE A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW OF THE EXPERIMENTAL LITERATURE

    Eleanor Singer;Dawn R. Von Thurn;Esther R. Miller

  • Introduction Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys

    Eleanor Singer

  • Racial and ethnic variations in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing.

    Eleanor Singer;Toni Antonucci;John van Hoewyk

  • Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design: Response Effects to Threatening Questions in Survey Research.

    Howard Schuman;Norman M. Bradburn;Seymour Sudman;Edward Blair

  • Reporting on Risk: How the Mass Media Portray Accidents, Diseases, Disasters and Other Hazards

    Eleanor Singer;Phyllis M. Endreny

  • Do Incentives Exert Undue Influence on Survey Participation? Experimental Evidence:

    Eleanor Singer;Mick P. Couper

  • The Effect of Interviewer Characteristics and Expectations on Response

    Unknown

  • The DECISIONS Study: A Nationwide Survey of United States Adults Regarding 9 Common Medical Decisions:

    Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher;Mick P. Couper;Eleanor Singer;Carrie A. Levin

  • Use of the Internet and ratings of information sources for medical decisions: results from the DECISIONS survey.

    Mick P. Couper;Eleanor Singer;Carrie A. Levin;Floyd J. Fowler

  • Readings in reference group theory and research

    Unknown

  • Incentives for survey participation when are they "coercive"?

    Eleanor Singer;Robert M. Bossarte

  • THE IMPACT OF PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY CONCERNS ON SURVEY PARTICIPATION THE CASE OF THE 1990 U.S. CENSUS

    Eleanor Singer;Nancy A. Mathiowetz;Mick P. Couper

  • CONFIDENTIALITY ASSURANCES IN SURVEYS: REASSURANCE OR THREAT?

    Eleanor Singer;Hans-Jürgen Hippler;Norbert Schwarz

  • Differential Incentives: Beliefs about Practices, Perceptions of Equity, and Effects on Survey Participation

    Eleanor Singer;Robert M. Groves;Amy D. Corning

  • Deficits and variations in patients' experience with making 9 common medical decisions: the DECISIONS survey.

    Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher;Mick P. Couper;Eleanor Singer;Peter A. Ubel;Peter A. Ubel

Frequent Co-Authors

Mick P. Couper
Mick P. Couper University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stanley Presser
Stanley Presser University of Maryland, College Park
Robert M. Groves
Robert M. Groves University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Angela Fagerlin
Angela Fagerlin University of Utah
Roger Tourangeau
Roger Tourangeau Westat (United States)
Toni C. Antonucci
Toni C. Antonucci University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Howard Schuman
Howard Schuman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Peter A. Ubel
Peter A. Ubel Duke University
Frederick G. Conrad
Frederick G. Conrad University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up flexible pathways to rewarding careers. Online MSW programs are a popular choice for those looking to enter social work, offering accredited curricula that prepare graduates for roles in healthcare, community organizations, and beyond.

For those interested in behavioral analysis, consider BCBA online programs. These programs are designed for future Board Certified Behavior Analysts and often feature flexible scheduling—ideal for working professionals.

If you want to accelerate your education, there are options to complete a master’s degree quickly. 1 year MSW programs online no BSW provide an expedited route to the social work field, even for those without a bachelor’s in social work.

Aspiring psychologists can also benefit from fast-tracked pathways, such as a 2 year psychology degree online. Accelerated online learning makes it possible to balance studies with other commitments, while building expertise in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Eleanor Singer

Recently Published Articles