World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 48 3204 2946 1542 1395 152 7782

Celeste M. Condit publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Celeste M. Condit between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Celeste M. Condit published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2001. 3 of the 159 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2001. 1985: 3 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 4 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1985 2025

159 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Celeste M. Condit: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 3
1986 0
1987 3
1988 2
1989 3
1990 4
1991 1
1992 1
1993 4
1994 3
1995 3
1996 7
1997 3
1998 4
1999 4
2000 4
2001 11
2002 4
2003 5
2004 11
2005 7
2006 3
2007 6
2008 6
2009 9
2010 3
2011 3
2012 3
2013 4
2014 2
2015 5
2016 5
2017 1
2018 6
2019 8
2020 0
2021 1
2022 4
2023 0
2024 2
2025 1
Total 159
Download as CSV

Celeste M. Condit publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Celeste M. Condit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 152 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 152
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Celeste M. Condit D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Celeste M. Condit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203 48
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Celeste M. Condit is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research falls primarily within the Arts and Humanities, with a focus on several interdisciplinary subfields including Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Political Science and International Relations.

The major topics addressed in Condit's work encompass Rhetoric and Communication Studies, Climate Change Communication and Perception, American Constitutional Law and Politics, American Political and Social Dynamics, Animal and Plant Science Education, Media Influence and Health, and Empathy and Medical Education.

Recent papers authored by Condit include:

  • Rhetorical strategies for retrieving abortion rights, 2022, Quarterly Journal of Speech
  • Phronesis and the Scientific, Ideological, Fearful Appeal of Lockdown Policy, 2020, Philosophy and Rhetoric
  • Multiple Voices, Messy Truths, 2020, Rhetoric of Health & Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Condit are Bryan B. Bozeman, Gary D. Grossman, Lisa DeTora, Hafiz Javed ur Rehman, and Carolyn R. Miller.

Condit's work has been published in multiple venues, reflecting a broad engagement with rhetorical and communication scholarship. The most frequent publication venues include Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Quarterly Journal of Speech, Science Communication, Philosophy and Rhetoric, and Rhetoric of Health & Medicine.

Best Publications

  • The rhetorical limits of polysemy

    Celeste Michelle Condit

  • Genetic Research and Health Disparities

    Pamela Sankar;Mildred K. Cho;Celeste M. Condit;Linda M. Hunt

  • Decoding Abortion Rhetoric: Communicating Social Change

    Celeste Michelle Condit

  • The psychometric property and validation of a fatalism scale

    Lijiang Shen;Celeste M. Condit;Lanelle Wright

  • The functions of epideictic: The Boston massacre orations as exemplar

    Celeste Michelle Condit

  • Crafting Equality: America's Anglo-African Word

    Celeste Michelle Condit;John Louis Lucaites

  • Hegemony in a mass‐mediated society: Concordance about reproductive technologies 1

    Celeste Michelle Condit

  • Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: a focus group study of public understandings of genetic research.

    Benjamin R. Bates;John A. Lynch;Jennifer L. Bevan;Celeste M. Condit

  • Science and the sources of hype.

    T. Caulfield;C. Condit

  • How the public understands genetics: non-deterministic and non-discriminatory interpretations of the “blueprint” metaphor:

    Celeste M. Condit

  • Functions of health fatalism: fatalistic talk as face saving, uncertainty management, stress relief and sense making

    Bethany Keeley;Lanelle Wright;Celeste M. Condit

  • Re-constructing Narrative Theory: A Functional Perspective

    John Louis Lucaites;Celeste Michelle Condit

  • Determinism and Mass-Media Portrayals of Genetics

    Celeste M. Condit;Nneka Ofulue;Kristine M. Sheedy

  • The meanings of the gene : public debates about human heredity

    Celeste Michelle Condit

  • Future health applications of genomics: priorities for communication, behavioral, and social sciences research.

    Colleen M. McBride;Deborah Bowen;Lawrence C. Brody;Celeste M. Condit

  • Public understandings of genetics and health.

    CM Condit

  • Contemporary rhetorical theory : a reader

    John Louis Lucaites;Celeste Michelle Condit;Sally Caudill

  • What is 'public opinion' about genetics?

    Celeste Condit

  • Public Attitudes and Beliefs About Genetics

    Celeste M. Condit

  • An Exploratory Study of the Impact of News Headlines on Genetic Determinism

    Celeste M. Condit;Alex Ferguson;Rachel Kassel;Chitra Thadhani

  • Diversity in lay perceptions of the sources of human traits: genes, environments, and personal behaviors.

    Roxanne L Parrott;Kami J Silk;Celeste Condit

Frequent Co-Authors

Lijiang Shen
Lijiang Shen Pennsylvania State University
Deborah J. Bowen
Deborah J. Bowen University of Washington
Colleen M. McBride
Colleen M. McBride Emory University
Alan R. Templeton
Alan R. Templeton Washington University in St. Louis
Timothy Caulfield
Timothy Caulfield University of Alberta
Paul Spicer
Paul Spicer University of Oklahoma
Mildred K. Cho
Mildred K. Cho Stanford University
Theresa M. Marteau
Theresa M. Marteau University of Cambridge
Thomas W. Valente
Thomas W. Valente University of Southern California
Lawrence C. Brody
Lawrence C. Brody National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities provides access to a diverse range of online degrees that suit varied career goals and schedules. For students interested in psychology, affordability is a top concern. Consider a masters in psychology online cheap to gain advanced knowledge without overwhelming financial stress.

Time commitment is another factor for many learners. If you’re seeking to advance quickly in educational leadership, 1 year edd programs online can provide a fast track into higher education administration and policy roles.

Similarly, those who want to gain new skills efficiently across humanities and social sciences should consider 1 year masters programs, designed for focused and accelerated study.

Finally, if you’re eager to launch your career sooner, online accelerated programs offer bachelor’s degrees in a compressed timeframe, making education more accessible and flexible for busy adults.

Each of these flexible online pathways can open new doors and help you reach your professional goals in Social Sciences and Humanities, no matter your current circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Celeste M. Condit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles