World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 87 13476 12681 6852 6337 527 35161

Deborah J. Bowen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Deborah J. Bowen between 1972 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Deborah J. Bowen published across 53 years, from 1972 to 2024, averaging 10.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2014. 13 of the 550 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2014. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 26 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 25 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications
1972 2024

550 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Deborah J. Bowen: publications per year, 1972 to 2024
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 2
1986 1
1987 4
1988 0
1989 1
1990 2
1991 3
1992 6
1993 6
1994 9
1995 7
1996 2
1997 5
1998 6
1999 10
2000 16
2001 12
2002 9
2003 25
2004 26
2005 12
2006 25
2007 27
2008 24
2009 26
2010 19
2011 27
2012 20
2013 24
2014 32
2015 22
2016 20
2017 19
2018 14
2019 20
2020 23
2021 23
2022 6
2023 8
2024 5
Total 550
Download as CSV

Deborah J. Bowen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah J. Bowen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 521–540 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 527 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610 527
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Deborah J. Bowen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah J. Bowen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 87
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Deborah J. Bowen is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields, primarily focusing on Health Professions and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Within these broader disciplines, their work is situated especially in General Health Professions, Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology, and Applied Psychology.

The main areas of study for Bowen include topics related to BRCA gene mutations in cancer, health policy implementation science, mental health and patient involvement, genomics and rare diseases, mental health treatment and access, ethics in clinical research, and digital mental health interventions.

Bowen has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Translational Behavioral Medicine
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • Patient Education and Counseling
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Their research collaborations include frequent co-authorship with Elizabeth M. Swisher, Catharine Wang, Barbara M. Norquist, Nicole Ackermann, and Brian H. Shirts.

Selected recent papers reflect the scope and focus of Bowen's research interests:

  • Strategies of community engagement in research: definitions and classifications, 2020, Translational Behavioral Medicine
  • Barriers, interventions, and recommendations: Improving the genetic testing landscape, 2022, Frontiers in Digital Health
  • Comparison of Teleintegrated Care and Telereferral Care for Treating Complex Psychiatric Disorders in Primary Care, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Reaching Consensus on Principles of Stakeholder Engagement in Research, 2020, Progress in Community Health Partnerships
  • Remotely Delivered Cancer Genetic Testing in the Making Genetic Testing Accessible (MAGENTA) Trial, 2023, JAMA Oncology

Best Publications

  • How We Design Feasibility Studies

    Deborah J. Bowen;Matthew Kreuter;Bonnie Spring;Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel

  • Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study

    G. Anderson;S. Cummings;L. S. Freedman;C. Furberg

  • Effect of estrogen plus progestin on global cognitive function in postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Memory Study: a randomized controlled trial.

    Stephen R. Rapp;Mark A. Espeland;Sally A. Shumaker;Victor W. Henderson

  • Effect of exercise on total and intra-abdominal body fat in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial.

    Melinda L. Irwin;Yutaka Yasui;Cornelia M. Ulrich;Deborah Bowen

  • Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health: Findings and Concerns

    Laura Dean;Ilan H. Meyer;Kevin Robinson;Randall L. Sell

  • Low-Fat Dietary Pattern and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: The Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial

    Shirley A. A. Beresford;Karen C. Johnson;Cheryl Ritenbaugh;Norman L. Lasser

  • Sexual orientation and health: comparisons in the women's health initiative sample.

    Barbara G. Valanis;Deborah J. Bowen;Tamsen Bassford;Evelyn Whitlock

  • Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study.

    Constance D. Lehman;Claudine Isaacs;Mitchell D. Schnall;Etta D. Pisano

  • Cancer-related risk indicators and preventive screening behaviors among lesbians and bisexual women.

    Susan D. Cochran;Vickie M. Mays;Deborah Bowen;Suzann Gage

  • Effect of Exercise on Serum Estrogens in Postmenopausal Women A 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial

    Anne McTiernan;Shelley S. Tworoger;Shelley S. Tworoger;Cornelia M. Ulrich;Yutaka Yasui

  • Changes in diet, physical activity, and supplement use among adults diagnosed with cancer

    Ruth E Patterson;Marian L Neuhouser;Monique M Hedderson;Stephen M Schwartz

  • Family history of diabetes as a potential public health tool

    Tabitha A Harrison;Lucia A Hindorff;Helen Kim;Roberta C.M Wines

  • Overweight and obesity in sexual-minority women: evidence from population-based data

    Ulrike Boehmer;Deborah J. Bowen;Greta R. Bauer

  • Research Funded by the National Institutes of Health on the Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Populations

    Robert W. S. Coulter;Karey S. Kenst;Deborah J. Bowen;Scout

  • Reliability and Validity of the Women's Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale

    Douglas W. Levine;Daniel F. Kripke;Robert M. Kaplan;Megan A. Lewis

  • The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women's Health Initiative.

    Judith Hsia;Elizabeth Kemper;Catarina I. Kiefe;Jane G. Zapka

  • An application of the stage model of behavior change to dietary fat reduction

    Susan J. Curry;Alan R. Kristal;Deborah J. Bowen

  • The Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS): A Trial of the Effect of Estrogen Therapy in Preventing and Slowing the Progression of Dementia

    Sally A. Shumaker;Beth A. Reboussin;Mark A. Espeland;Stephen R. Rapp

  • Differences in Survival by Histologic Type of Pancreatic Cancer

    Megan Dann Fesinmeyer;Melissa A. Austin;Christopher I. Li;Anneclaire J. De Roos

  • Health Inequalities Among Sexual Minority Adults: Evidence from Ten U.S. States, 2010

    John R. Blosnich;Grant W. Farmer;Joseph G.L. Lee;Vincent M.B. Silenzio

Frequent Co-Authors

Tait D. Shanafelt
Tait D. Shanafelt Stanford University
Neil E. Kay
Neil E. Kay Mayo Clinic
Wylie Burke
Wylie Burke University of Washington
Yutaka Yasui
Yutaka Yasui St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Susan L. Slager
Susan L. Slager Mayo Clinic
John D. Potter
John D. Potter Massey University
Curtis A. Hanson
Curtis A. Hanson Mayo Clinic
Cornelia M. Ulrich
Cornelia M. Ulrich University of Utah
Nicole Urban
Nicole Urban Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Jennifer L. Hay
Jennifer L. Hay Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in expanding your healthcare career options beyond traditional routes? There are several online programs that can help you move forward in different medical and allied health professions in the USA.

For students interested in nursing, there are flexible pathways to get started. Many nursing schools that don't require teas or HESI exams make it more accessible to begin your nursing education. This is ideal for students who want to avoid lengthy standardized entrance exams.

If healthcare management appeals to you, a degree in healthcare administration can help you take on leadership roles in clinics, hospitals, and public health organizations. Accelerated programs online are available for those who want to fast-track their careers.

Registered nurses seeking advancement should consider adn to np or MSN bridge programs. These online pathways allow you to become a nurse practitioner without starting from scratch—and often with flexible scheduling.

Finally, students curious about nutrition and wellness can look into an online dietitian degree. These programs provide the foundations for careers as a registered dietitian or nutritionist, all from the convenience of home.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah J. Bowen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles