World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cornelia M. Ulrich

Cornelia M. Ulrich

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
43321
World Ranking
6239
National Ranking
3329

Cornelia M. Ulrich publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelia M. Ulrich sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,057 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Cornelia M. Ulrich D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelia M. Ulrich sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cornelia M. Ulrich is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields, primarily focusing on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these areas, they have contributed extensively to subfields including oncology, molecular biology, physiology, genetics, and cancer research.

The main topics of their scientific work include cancer survivorship and care, nutrition and health in aging, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, diet and metabolism studies, colorectal cancer screening and detection, cancer, lipids, and metabolism, and gut microbiota and health.

Frequent publication venues for Cornelia M. Ulrich's work include:

  • Cancer Research
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • UNC Libraries
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nutrients

They have collaborated extensively with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Jennifer Ose
  • Christopher I. Li
  • Biljana Gigic
  • Erin M. Siegel
  • Adetunji T. Toriola

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Cornelia M. Ulrich include:

  • Physical activity and risks of breast and colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomisation analysis, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Genome-wide Modeling of Polygenic Risk Score in Colorectal Cancer Risk, 2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Deciphering colorectal cancer genetics through multi-omic analysis of 100,204 cases and 154,587 controls of European and east Asian ancestries, 2022, Nature Genetics
  • Adiposity, metabolites, and colorectal cancer risk: Mendelian randomization study, 2020, BMC Medicine
  • Metabolic dysfunction and obesity-related cancer: Beyond obesity and metabolic syndrome, 2022, Obesity

Best Publications

  • Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk.

    Ellen L. Goode;Cornelia M. Ulrich;John D. Potter;John D. Potter

  • Meta-analysis of fecal metagenomes reveals global microbial signatures that are specific for colorectal cancer

    Jakob Wirbel;Paul Theodor Pyl;Paul Theodor Pyl;Ece Kartal;Konrad Zych

  • Potential of fecal microbiota for early‐stage detection of colorectal cancer

    Georg Zeller;Julien Tap;Anita Y Voigt;Shinichi Sunagawa

  • Metagenomic analysis of colorectal cancer datasets identifies cross-cohort microbial diagnostic signatures and a link with choline degradation

    Andrew Maltez Thomas;Andrew Maltez Thomas;Paolo Manghi;Francesco Asnicar;Edoardo Pasolli

  • Elevated Biomarkers of Inflammation Are Associated With Reduced Survival Among Breast Cancer Patients

    Brandon L. Pierce;Rachel Ballard-Barbash;Leslie Bernstein;Richard N. Baumgartner

  • Effect of exercise on total and intra-abdominal body fat in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial.

    Melinda L. Irwin;Yutaka Yasui;Cornelia M. Ulrich;Deborah Bowen

  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for cancer prevention: promise, perils and pharmacogenetics

    Cornelia M. Ulrich;Jeannette Bigler;John D. Potter

  • Unmetabolized Folic Acid in Plasma Is Associated with Reduced Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity among Postmenopausal Women

    Aron M. Troen;Breeana Mitchell;Breeana Mitchell;Bess Sorensen;Mark H. Wener

  • Discovery of common and rare genetic risk variants for colorectal cancer

    Jeroen R. Huyghe;Stephanie A. Bien;Tabitha A. Harrison;Hyun Min Kang

  • Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer: The Role of Polymorphisms in Candidate Genes

    Linda M. Dong;John D. Potter;John D. Potter;Emily White;Emily White;Cornelia M. Ulrich

  • Effect of Exercise on Serum Estrogens in Postmenopausal Women A 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial

    Anne McTiernan;Shelley S. Tworoger;Shelley S. Tworoger;Cornelia M. Ulrich;Yutaka Yasui

  • Interindividual Variation in Nucleotide Excision Repair Genes and Risk of Endometrial Cancer

    Jocelyn M. Weiss;Jocelyn M. Weiss;Jocelyn M. Weiss;Noel S. Weiss;Noel S. Weiss;Cornelia M. Ulrich;Jennifer A. Doherty

  • 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Polymorphisms and Leukemia Risk: A HuGE Minireview

    Kim Robien;Cornelia M. Ulrich

  • Physical activity and risks of breast and colorectal cancer : a Mendelian randomisation analysis

    Nikos Papadimitriou;Niki Dimou;Konstantinos K. Tsilidis;Konstantinos K. Tsilidis;Barbara Banbury

  • Vitamin and Mineral Supplement Use Among US Adults After Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review

    Christine M. Velicer;Cornelia M. Ulrich

  • Physical activity and cancer etiology: associations and mechanisms.

    Anne McTiernan;Cornelia M. Ulrich;Shelley Slate;Shelley Slate;John Potter;John Potter

  • Pharmacogenetics of methotrexate: toxicity among marrow transplantation patients varies with the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism

    Cornelia M. Ulrich;Yutaka Yasui;Yutaka Yasui;Rainer Storb;Rainer Storb;Mark M. Schubert;Mark M. Schubert

  • Searching Expressed Sequence Tag Databases: Discovery and Confirmation of a Common Polymorphism in the Thymidylate Synthase Gene

    Cornelia M. Ulrich;Jeannette Bigler;Christine M. Velicer;Elizabeth A. Greene

  • Identification of Genetic Susceptibility Loci for Colorectal Tumors in a Genome-Wide Meta-analysis

    Ulrike Peters;Ulrike Peters;Shuo Jiao;Fredrick R. Schumacher;Carolyn M. Hutter;Carolyn M. Hutter

  • Discovery of common and rare genetic risk variants for colorectal cancer

    Jeroen R. Huyghe;Stephanie A. Bien;Tabitha A. Harrison;Hyun Min Kang

Frequent Co-Authors

John D. Potter
John D. Potter Massey University
Polly A. Newcomb
Polly A. Newcomb Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Jenny Chang-Claude
Jenny Chang-Claude German Cancer Research Center
Hermann Brenner
Hermann Brenner German Cancer Research Center
Martha L. Slattery
Martha L. Slattery University of Utah
Michael Hoffmeister
Michael Hoffmeister German Cancer Research Center
Emily White
Emily White Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Andrew T. Chan
Andrew T. Chan Harvard University
Bette J. Caan
Bette J. Caan Kaiser Permanente
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

There are many routes for students interested in healthcare beyond a traditional Medical degree in the USA. Rapidly growing fields like nursing, health administration, and advanced practice offer numerous online degree options that can help you break into healthcare or advance your career quickly and affordably.

For those drawn to mental health, psych nurse practitioner programs offer specialized training to become a mental health nurse practitioner. These flexible online programs make it easier for working professionals to upskill while still meeting personal commitments.

A health administration degree online is a solid choice for those who want a leadership role in healthcare without direct patient care. For advanced positions, consider online mha programs affordable options, which can open doors to executive and management roles in hospitals, clinics, and health systems.

If you’re a nurse aiming for the highest level of practice or teaching, look for the most affordable online dnp programs. These advanced degrees can help you shape policies, lead organizations, and improve patient outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Cornelia M. Ulrich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles