World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8885 8297 4722 4297 182 6010

Martina Luchetti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martina Luchetti between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martina Luchetti published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2025. 37 of the 226 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2025. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 34 publications 2025: 36 publications 2026: 1 publication
2007 2026

226 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martina Luchetti: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 0
2009 1
2010 0
2011 2
2012 1
2013 2
2014 6
2015 2
2016 10
2017 4
2018 8
2019 8
2020 19
2021 35
2022 28
2023 28
2024 34
2025 36
2026 1
Total 226
Download as CSV

Martina Luchetti publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martina Luchetti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 182 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 182
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Martina Luchetti D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martina Luchetti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Martina Luchetti is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States and specializes primarily in psychology, with a focus on clinical psychology, social psychology, health, experimental and cognitive psychology, and psychiatry and mental health. Their research spans several topics including health disparities and outcomes, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, personality traits and psychology, aging and gerontology research, dementia and cognitive impairment research, optimism, hope, and well-being, as well as cognitive abilities and testing.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • The trajectory of loneliness in response to COVID-19, 2020, American Psychologist
  • Psychological and behavioural responses to Coronavirus disease 2019: The role of personality, 2020, European Journal of Personality
  • Loneliness is associated with risk of cognitive impairment in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, 2020, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Is personality associated with dementia risk? A meta-analytic investigation, 2021, Ageing Research Reviews
  • Preventive Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Associations With Perceived Behavioral Control, Attitudes, and Subjective Norm, 2021, Frontiers in Public Health

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Antonio Terracciano
  • Angelina R. Sutin
  • Yannick Stéphan
  • Damaris Aschwanden
  • Amanda A. Sesker

Martina Luchetti's work is often published in venues such as:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Aging & Mental Health
  • Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Their research focuses on understanding the psychological and behavioral aspects of aging and health, with emphasis on how personality traits and social factors influence well-being and cognitive outcomes. Loneliness and its effects in the context of public health challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic are recurring themes in their recent studies.

Best Publications

  • The trajectory of loneliness in response to COVID-19.

    Martina Luchetti;Ji Hyun Lee;Damaris Aschwanden;Amanda Sesker

  • Loneliness and Risk of Dementia.

    Angelina R Sutin;Yannick Stephan;Martina Luchetti;Antonio Terracciano

  • The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Physical Inactivity: A Meta-Analysis of 16 Samples.

    Angelina R. Sutin;Yannick Stephan;Martina Luchetti;Ashley Artese

  • Personality and Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: Data From a Longitudinal Sample and Meta-Analysis

    Martina Luchetti;Antonio Terracciano;Yannick Stephan;Angelina R. Sutin

  • Psychological and Behavioural Responses to Coronavirus Disease 2019: The Role of Personality.

    Damaris Aschwanden;Jason E. Strickhouser;Amanda A. Sesker;Ji Hyun Lee

  • Five-factor model personality traits and inflammatory markers: new data and a meta-analysis.

    Martina Luchetti;James M. Barkley;Yannick Stephan;Antonio Terracciano

  • Personality traits and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia

    Antonio Terracciano;Yannick Stephan;Martina Luchetti;Emiliano Albanese

  • Perceived weight discrimination and C-reactive protein

    Angelina R. Sutin;Yannick Stephan;Martina Luchetti;Antonio Terracciano

  • Measuring the phenomenology of autobiographical memory: A short form of the Memory Experiences Questionnaire.

    Martina Luchetti;Angelina R Sutin

  • Is personality associated with dementia risk? A meta-analytic investigation.

    Damaris Aschwanden;Jason E. Strickhouser;Martina Luchetti;Yannick Stephan

  • Preventive Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Associations With Perceived Behavioral Control, Attitudes, and Subjective Norm.

    Damaris Aschwanden;Jason E. Strickhouser;Amanda A. Sesker;Ji Hyun Lee

  • Five-factor model personality traits and cognitive function in five domains in older adulthood

    Angelina R. Sutin;Yannick Stephan;Martina Luchetti;Antonio Terracciano

  • Impact of Michelangelo prosthetic hand: Findings from a crossover longitudinal study.

    Martina Luchetti;Andrea G. Cutti;Gennaro Verni;Rinaldo Sacchetti

  • Parental educational attainment and adult offspring personality: An intergenerational life span approach to the origin of adult personality traits.

    Angelina R. Sutin;Martina Luchetti;Yannick Stephan;Richard W. Robins

  • Allostatic Load and Personality: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study.

    Yannick Stephan;Angelina R. Sutin;Martina Luchetti;Antonio Terracciano

  • Change in five-factor model personality traits during the acute phase of the coronavirus pandemic.

    Angelina R. Sutin;Martina Luchetti;Damaris Aschwanden;Ji Hyun Lee

  • Feeling Older and the Development of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia

    Yannick Stephan;Angelina R. Sutin;Martina Luchetti;Antonio Terracciano

  • Is neuroticism differentially associated with risk of Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and frontotemporal dementia?

    Antonio Terracciano;Damaris Aschwanden;Luca Passamonti;Nicola Toschi

  • Personality and self-rated health across eight cohort studies.

    Yannick Stephan;Angelina R. Sutin;Martina Luchetti;Louis Hognon

  • Subjective age and risk of incident dementia: Evidence from the National Health and Aging Trends survey.

    Yannick Stephan;Angelina R. Sutin;Martina Luchetti;Antonio Terracciano

Frequent Co-Authors

Angelina R. Sutin
Angelina R. Sutin Florida State University
Antonio Terracciano
Antonio Terracciano Florida State University
Yannick Stephan
Yannick Stephan University of Montpellier
Mathias Allemand
Mathias Allemand University of Zurich
Mary A. Gerend
Mary A. Gerend Florida State University
Nicholas A. Turiano
Nicholas A. Turiano West Virginia University
Eric Robinson
Eric Robinson University of Liverpool
Michael Daly
Michael Daly National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Susan M. Resnick
Susan M. Resnick National Institutes of Health
David Schlessinger
David Schlessinger National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to numerous online programs and diverse career options in the mental health field. Many students are interested in becoming professional therapists or counselors, which generally requires a graduate degree and specific certifications or licensure depending on the city or state.

Requirements for practicing therapy can vary widely. For example, if you are interested in the licensed therapist requirements in Los Angeles, you’ll need to complete extensive postgraduate supervised hours and pass relevant exams. If you want to learn how to become a licensed therapist in Louisville, you’ll encounter specific Kentucky regulations on coursework and practice hours.

The process is also unique for becoming a licensed therapist in Lubbock, where Texas state licensure rules apply. Similarly, you can discover the steps involved in becoming a licensed therapist in Madison and what you’ll need for Wisconsin certification.

Whether you are seeking an online psychology degree for flexibility or planning your pathway to licensure, understanding local requirements is key to a rewarding career. Research each region and choose an academic path that aligns with your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Martina Luchetti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles