World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 58 1659 1488 304 274 224 12315

Celia Hoyles publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Celia Hoyles between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Celia Hoyles published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 1992. 4 of the 241 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 1992. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 22 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1982 2025

241 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Celia Hoyles: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 3
1986 2
1987 3
1988 3
1989 5
1990 3
1991 2
1992 22
1993 3
1994 5
1995 7
1996 13
1997 8
1998 12
1999 3
2000 4
2001 8
2002 13
2003 3
2004 7
2005 15
2006 11
2007 8
2008 7
2009 16
2010 7
2011 8
2012 2
2013 9
2014 4
2015 5
2016 2
2017 3
2018 4
2019 2
2020 3
2021 0
2022 1
2023 0
2024 3
2025 1
Total 241
Download as CSV

Celia Hoyles publications per year - data summary

  • Celia Hoyles, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University College London, has 241 publications recorded across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1982 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 1992, with 22 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1982, 2022 and 2025, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 44 years in the span carry no publications at all (1983, 1984, 2021 and 2023).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.0 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 5 publications, 2% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1982-1996: 72 publications (4.8 per year); 1997-2011: 130 publications (8.7 per year); 2012-2025: 39 publications (2.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Celia Hoyles publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Celia Hoyles sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 224–233 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 224 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213 224
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Celia Hoyles publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Celia Hoyles, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University College London, records 224 publications - the 72nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 72% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Celia Hoyles, and about 28% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Celia Hoyles ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Celia Hoyles D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Celia Hoyles sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95 58
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Celia Hoyles D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Celia Hoyles, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University College London, records 58 D-Index - the 79th percentile of the discipline.
  • 79% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Celia Hoyles, and about 21% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Celia Hoyles ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Celia Hoyles is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly falls within the social sciences, with a specialized focus on education and its various subfields including developmental and educational psychology, computer science applications, applied mathematics, and statistics and probability.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to mathematics education and teaching techniques, education and technology integration, innovative teaching and learning methods, teaching and learning programming, mathematics education and pedagogy, as well as cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills.

Recent publications by Celia Hoyles include:

  • "Exploring mathematics teachers' integration of technology into classroom teaching practice: a focus on geometric similarity," 2025, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
  • "Reflections on digital technologies in mathematics education across cultures," 2020, Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
  • "How Learning to Speak the Language of a Computer-Based Digital Environment Can Plant Seeds of Algebraic Generalisation: The Case of a 12-Year-Old Student and eXpresser," 2024, Education Sciences
  • "Tribute to Eugenio Filloy†: A pioneer and driving force of Mathematics Education as a discipline / Homenaje a Eugenio Filloy†: Un pionero impulsor de la disciplina de la Matemática Educativa," 2020, Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
  • "Remembering Uri: An Unforgettable Teacher, Colleague and Friend," 2024, Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Celia Hoyles are:

  • Alison Clark-Wilson
  • Richard Noss
  • Ali Şimşek
  • Nicola Bretscher

Publications by Celia Hoyles often appear in venues including:

  • Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
  • Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education
  • International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
  • Education Sciences

Best Publications

  • Windows on Mathematical Meanings: Learning Cultures and Computers

    Richard Noss;Celia Hoyles

  • A study of proof conceptions in algebra

    Lulu Healy;Celia Hoyles

  • Windows on Mathematical Meanings

    Richard Noss;Celia Hoyles

  • Mathematics Education and Technology-Rethinking the Terrain

    Celia Hoyles;Jean-Baptiste Lagrange

  • The Construction of Mathematical Meanings: Connecting the Visual with the Symbolic

    Richard Noss;Lulu Healy;Celia Hoyles

  • Logo mathematics in the classroom

    Celia Hoyles;Rosamund Sutherland

  • Proportional Reasoning in Nursing Practice

    Celia Hoyles;Richard Noss;Stefano Pozzi

  • The curricular shaping of students' approaches to proof

    Celia Hoyles

  • What can digital technologies take from and bring to research in mathematics education

    Celia Hoyles;Richard Noss

  • Software Tools for Geometrical Problem Solving: Potentials and Pitfalls

    Lulu Healy;Celia Hoyles

  • Improving Mathematics at Work: The Need for Techno-Mathematical Literacies

    Celia Hoyles;Richard Noss;Phillip Kent;Arthur Bakker

  • Developing new notations for a learnable mathematics in the computational era

    James Kaput;Richard Noss;Celia Hoyles

  • Mathematics Teaching and Mathematics Teachers: A Meta-Case Study

    Celia Hoyles

  • Changing patterns of transition from school to university mathematics

    Celia Hoyles;Kate Newman;Richard Noss

  • Students' understandings of logical implication

    Celia Hoyles;Dietmar Küchemann

  • Proof in dynamic geometry contexts

    Celia Hoyles;Keith Jones

  • A Pedagogy for Mathematical Microworlds.

    Celia Hoyles;Richard Noss

  • On the Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Classrooms

    Celia Hoyles;Richard Noss;Phillip Kent

  • Bridging Primary Programming and Mathematics: Some Findings of Design Research in England

    Laura Benton;Celia Hoyles;Ivan Kalas;Ivan Kalas;Richard Noss

  • Visual and Symbolic Reasoning in Mathematics: Making Connections with Computers?

    Lulu Healy;Celia Hoyles

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Noss
Richard Noss University College London
Arthur Bakker
Arthur Bakker Utrecht University
Michael J. Reiss
Michael J. Reiss University College London
Sigrid Blömeke
Sigrid Blömeke University of Oslo
Jeremy Roschelle
Jeremy Roschelle Digital Promise
Andrea A. diSessa
Andrea A. diSessa University of California, Berkeley
Uri Wilensky
Uri Wilensky Northwestern University
Deborah Loewenberg Ball
Deborah Loewenberg Ball University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Harvey Goldstein
Harvey Goldstein University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities can open the door to a range of fulfilling careers, from counseling to research. Many students are now opting for flexible online programs to achieve their academic and professional goals. If you’re interested in psychology but concerned about costs, there are cheap online psychology degree options that make this field more accessible than ever.

For those drawn to advocacy or clinical social work, online msw programs offer flexible routes to licensure and advanced practice roles. Interested in advancing even further? Several universities now offer accredited psyd programs which prepare graduates for leadership and specialized clinical work in psychology.

If you wish to focus on helping couples and families, the best online mft programs can accelerate your journey into marriage and family therapy. These educational pathways offer not just flexibility, but direct links to rewarding and growing professions within social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Celia Hoyles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles