What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Mathematics education
- Education
- Artificial intelligence
Celia Hoyles mostly deals with Mathematics education, Curriculum, Reform mathematics, Secondary education and Connected Mathematics.
Her work deals with themes such as Information and Communications Technology and Pedagogy, which intersect with Mathematics education.
Her studies deal with areas such as Computer-Assisted Instruction and Peer interaction as well as Pedagogy.
Her Curriculum research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Situated, Artificial intelligence, Teacher education and Metaphor.
Her research investigates the link between Teacher education and topics such as Blended learning that cross with problems in Context.
Her Concept learning research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Epistemology, Abstraction, Science education and Technology integration.
Her most cited work include:
- Windows on Mathematical Meanings: Learning Cultures and Computers (528 citations)
- Windows on Mathematical Meanings (394 citations)
- A Study of Proof Conceptions in Algebra (357 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Her primary scientific interests are in Mathematics education, Pedagogy, Curriculum, Logo and Epistemology.
Her studies examine the connections between Mathematics education and genetics, as well as such issues in Process, with regards to Scale.
A large part of her Pedagogy studies is devoted to Primary education.
Her Curriculum study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Cornerstone and Teacher education.
Her work in Reform mathematics tackles topics such as Math wars which are related to areas like Everyday Mathematics and Core-Plus Mathematics Project.
Her research in Mathematics instruction focuses on subjects like Educational technology, which are connected to Teaching method.
She most often published in these fields:
- Mathematics education (57.28%)
- Pedagogy (13.62%)
- Curriculum (12.21%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2007-2020)?
- Mathematics education (57.28%)
- Curriculum (12.21%)
- Pedagogy (13.62%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her primary areas of study are Mathematics education, Curriculum, Pedagogy, Professional development and Artificial intelligence.
Her study in Mathematics education is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Focus, Scale and Process.
Her Focus research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Teaching method, Algebraic number and Meaning.
Celia Hoyles interconnects Invisibility and Overall equipment effectiveness in the investigation of issues within Process.
Celia Hoyles combines subjects such as Transformative learning, Cornerstone, Teacher education and Agency with her study of Curriculum.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Educational systems, Tracking and Natural language processing in addition to Artificial intelligence.
Between 2007 and 2020, her most popular works were:
- Mathematics Education and Technology-Rethinking the Terrain (142 citations)
- Improving Mathematics at Work: The Need for Techno-Mathematical Literacies (114 citations)
- Mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain : the 17th ICMI study (80 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Mathematics education
- Education
- Artificial intelligence
Celia Hoyles mainly investigates Mathematics education, Teaching method, Curriculum, Educational technology and Process.
Her work in the fields of Teacher support overlaps with other areas such as Information technology.
Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Epistemology, Affordance and Focus.
She has included themes like Educational systems, Notation and Natural language processing in her Curriculum study.
Celia Hoyles has researched Educational technology in several fields, including Qualitative research, Instructional design, Mathematics instruction and Summative assessment.
Her work deals with themes such as Educational research, Scale and Professional learning community, which intersect with Process.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
