World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
46
Citations
8797
World Ranking
3638
National Ranking
624

Richard Noss publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Noss sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 188 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Richard Noss D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Noss sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Noss is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their primary research fields encompass Computer Science with a focus on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computer Science Applications, Education, Artificial Intelligence, and Information Systems. Their work intersects multiple topics such as Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, Teaching and Learning Programming, Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques, Advanced Text Analysis Techniques, Information Retrieval and Search Behavior, and Video Analysis and Summarization.

The scientist has contributed to a variety of publications across several venues, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach within educational sciences and computer science domains. Their recent papers include:

  • How Learning to Speak the Language of a Computer-Based Digital Environment Can Plant Seeds of Algebraic Generalisation: The Case of a 12-Year-Old Student and eXpresser (2024), published in Education Sciences
  • Tribute to Eugenio Filloy†: A pioneer and driving force of Mathematics Education as a discipline / Homenaje a Eugenio Filloy†: Un pionero impulsor de la disciplina de la Matemática Educativa (2020), published in Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
  • Watch Less and Uncover More: Could Navigation Tools Help Users Search and Explore Videos? (2022), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Correction to: Remembering Uri: An Unforgettable Teacher, Colleague and Friend (2024), published in Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education

Noss has collaborated frequently with other researchers, highlighting ongoing partnerships with colleagues such as Celia Hoyles, Anna Baccaglini-Frank, Eirini Geraniou, Ana Isabel Sacristán, and Armando Solares. Collaboration with Celia Hoyles is the most prominent with multiple joint publications.

Their research integrates educational methodologies with technology, particularly digital environments and computational tools aimed at enhancing learning and exploration within mathematics and programming. This focus aligns with their involvement in innovative teaching methods and analysis of user interaction with educational videos and search systems.

Best Publications

  • Windows on Mathematical Meanings: Learning Cultures and Computers

    Richard Noss;Celia Hoyles

  • Windows on Mathematical Meanings

    Richard Noss;Celia Hoyles

  • The Construction of Mathematical Meanings: Connecting the Visual with the Symbolic

    Richard Noss;Lulu Healy;Celia Hoyles

  • Proportional Reasoning in Nursing Practice

    Celia Hoyles;Richard Noss;Stefano Pozzi

  • Decoding learning:the proof, promise and potential of digital education

    Rosemary Luckin;Brett Bligh;Andrew Manches;Shaaron Ainsworth

  • What can digital technologies take from and bring to research in mathematics education

    Celia Hoyles;Richard Noss

  • Improving Mathematics at Work: The Need for Techno-Mathematical Literacies

    Celia Hoyles;Richard Noss;Phillip Kent;Arthur Bakker

  • Developing new notations for a learnable mathematics in the computational era

    James Kaput;Richard Noss;Celia Hoyles

  • Changing patterns of transition from school to university mathematics

    Celia Hoyles;Kate Newman;Richard Noss

  • A Pedagogy for Mathematical Microworlds.

    Celia Hoyles;Richard Noss

  • On the Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Classrooms

    Celia Hoyles;Richard Noss;Phillip Kent

  • Bridging Primary Programming and Mathematics: Some Findings of Design Research in England

    Laura Benton;Celia Hoyles;Ivan Kalas;Ivan Kalas;Richard Noss

  • Tools in practice, mathematics in use

    Stefano Pozzi;Richard Noss;Celia Hoyles

  • The Microevolution of Mathematical Knowledge: The Case of Randomness

    Dave Pratt;Richard Noss

  • Abstraction in Expertise: A Study of Nurses' Conceptions of Concentration

    Richard Noss;Celia Hoyles;Stefano Pozzi

  • Learning mathematics and logo

    Celia Hoyles;Richard Noss

  • Children's Learning of Geometrical Concepts Through Logo.

    Richard Noss

  • Rethinking the microworld idea

    Celia Hoyles;Richard Noss;Ross Adamson

  • The visibility of meanings: modelling the mathematics of banking

    Richard Noss;Celia Hoyles

  • Computers and exploratory learning

    Andrea DiSessa;Celia Hoyles;Richard Noss

Frequent Co-Authors

Celia Hoyles
Celia Hoyles University College London
Arthur Bakker
Arthur Bakker Utrecht University
Alexandra Poulovassilis
Alexandra Poulovassilis Birkbeck, University of London
Mike Sharples
Mike Sharples The Open University
Harvey Goldstein
Harvey Goldstein University of Bristol
Uri Wilensky
Uri Wilensky Northwestern University
Geoff Whitty
Geoff Whitty University of Newcastle Australia
Andrea A. diSessa
Andrea A. diSessa University of California, Berkeley
Jeremy Roschelle
Jeremy Roschelle Digital Promise
Paul A. Kirschner
Paul A. Kirschner Open University in the Netherlands

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing online degrees in social sciences and humanities offers both flexibility and a wealth of career options. Many students seek programs that align with their personal goals, timelines, and budgets. For those aiming to rapidly advance in psychology, accelerated psyd programs can help you gain doctoral-level expertise in a shorter time frame.

If you are interested in marriage and family therapy, specialized mft programs online offer convenient pathways to licensure and clinical practice. Budget-conscious learners should explore the cheapest online master's in psychology for quality education without the high cost.

For educators looking to advance into leadership or research roles, accelerated doctoral programs in education online provide fast-track options. Each of these online pathways can open doors to impactful careers in counseling, research, teaching, and community leadership, all while accommodating busy schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Noss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles