World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5398 5013 2953 2679 157 11421

J. Scott Roberts publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by J. Scott Roberts between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. J. Scott Roberts published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2017. 28 of the 226 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2017. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 14 publications
1996 2025

226 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
J. Scott Roberts: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 3
2004 2
2005 5
2006 5
2007 3
2008 8
2009 10
2010 11
2011 12
2012 6
2013 10
2014 7
2015 17
2016 15
2017 19
2018 14
2019 13
2020 6
2021 12
2022 8
2023 9
2024 14
2025 14
Total 226
Download as CSV

J. Scott Roberts publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Scott Roberts sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 157 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 157
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

J. Scott Roberts D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Scott Roberts sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

J. Scott Roberts is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily lies in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Genetics, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's work covers multiple main topics, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Aging and Gerontology Research

J. Scott Roberts has frequently published in the following journals:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
  • Journal of Genetic Counseling
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • JAMA

The scientist has collaborated notably with Wendy R. Uhlmann, Erica Solway, Matthias Kirch, Dianne Singer, and Jeffrey T. Kullgren.

Among recent publications are:

  • Genetic testing for neurodegenerative diseases: Ethical and health communication challenges, 2020, Neurobiology of Disease
  • A randomized controlled trial of amyloid positron emission tomography results disclosure in mild cognitive impairment, 2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Volunteering, polygenic risk for Alzheimer's disease, and cognitive functioning among older adults, 2020, Social Science & Medicine
  • Disclosing genetic risk for Alzheimer's dementia to individuals with mild cognitive impairment, 2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
  • Reflections on project ECHO: qualitative findings from five different ECHO programs, 2021, Medical Education Online

Best Publications

  • Activating ESR1 mutations in hormone-resistant metastatic breast cancer

    Dan R. Robinson;Yi Mi Wu;Pankaj Vats;Fengyun Su

  • Integrative clinical genomics of metastatic cancer

    Dan R. Robinson;Yi Mi Wu;Robert J. Lonigro;Pankaj Vats

  • Personalized Oncology Through Integrative High-Throughput Sequencing: A Pilot Study

    Sameek Roychowdhury;Matthew K. Iyer;Dan R. Robinson;Robert J. Lonigro

  • Disclosure of APOE Genotype for Risk of Alzheimer's Disease

    Robert C. Green;Robert C. Green;J. Scott Roberts;L. Adrienne Cupples;Norman R. Relkin

  • Successful Aging in the United States: Prevalence Estimates From a National Sample of Older Adults

    Sara J. McLaughlin;Cathleen M Connell;Steven G. Heeringa;Lydia W. Li

  • Genetic counseling and testing for Alzheimer disease: Joint practice guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors

    Jill S. Goldman;Susan E. Hahn;Jennifer Williamson Catania;Susan Larusse-Eckert

  • Integrative Clinical Sequencing in the Management of Refractory or Relapsed Cancer in Youth

    Rajen J. Mody;Yi Mi Wu;Robert J. Lonigro;Xuhong Cao

  • Health behavior changes after genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer disease: The REVEAL Study.

    Serena Chao;J. Scott Roberts;Theresa M. Marteau;Rebecca Silliman

  • The Scientific Foundation for personal genomics: recommendations from a National Institutes of Health-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multidisciplinary workshop.

    Muin J. Khoury;Muin J. Khoury;Colleen M. McBride;Sheri D. Schully;John P.A. Ioannidis;John P.A. Ioannidis

  • Genetic risk assessment for adult children of people with Alzheimer's disease: the Risk Evaluation and Education for Alzheimer's Disease (REVEAL) study.

    J. Scott Roberts;L. Adrienne Cupples;Norman R. Relkin;Peter J. Whitehouse

  • Differences between African Americans and whites in their perceptions of Alzheimer disease.

    J. Scott Roberts;Cathleen M. Connell;Dawn Cisewski;Yvonne G. Hipps

  • Genetic Testing For Alzheimer’s Disease And Its Impact On Insurance Purchasing Behavior

    Cathleen D. Zick;Charles J. Mathews;J. Scott Roberts;Robert Cook-Deegan

  • APOE-related risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia for prevention trials: An analysis of four cohorts.

    Jing Qian;Frank J. Wolters;Alexa Beiser;Mary Haan

  • Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies

    J. Scott Roberts;Jenny Ostergren

  • Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine

    Robert C. Green;Robert C. Green;Katrina A.B. Goddard;Gail P. Jarvik;Laura M. Amendola

  • Public opinion about Alzheimer disease among blacks, hispanics, and whites: results from a national survey.

    Cathleen M Connell;J. Scott Roberts;Sara J. McLaughlin

  • Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.

    J. Scott Roberts;Michele C. Gornick;Deanna Alexis Carere;Wendy R. Uhlmann

  • The MedSeq Project: A randomized trial of integrating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine

    Jason L Vassy;Jason L Vassy;Denise M Lautenbach;Heather M McLaughlin;Heather M McLaughlin;Sek Won Kong;Sek Won Kong

  • Racial differences in knowledge and beliefs about Alzheimer disease.

    Cathleen M Connell;J. Scott Roberts;Sara J. McLaughlin;Dapo Akinleye

  • Who seeks genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer's disease? Findings from a multisite, randomized clinical trial.

    J. Scott Roberts;Melissa Barber;Tamsen M. Brown;L. Adrienne Cupples

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert C. Green
Robert C. Green Brigham and Women's Hospital
L. Adrienne Cupples
L. Adrienne Cupples Boston University
Peter J. Whitehouse
Peter J. Whitehouse Case Western Reserve University
Scott Y. H. Kim
Scott Y. H. Kim National Institutes of Health
Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Arul M. Chinnaiyan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Barbara B. Biesecker
Barbara B. Biesecker RTI International
Eric M. Reiman
Eric M. Reiman Arizona State University
Lindsay A. Farrer
Lindsay A. Farrer Boston University
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gil D. Rabinovici
Gil D. Rabinovici University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of in-demand career pathways, such as counseling, therapy, and mental health services. Many states have specific requirements to become a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), making it essential for aspiring professionals to understand both educational and licensing steps along the way.

For example, those interested in practicing in North Carolina can find detailed information about lpc licensure requirements in North Carolina, including necessary graduate degrees and supervised experience. If you’re considering working in the Midwest, you’ll want to review the North Dakota licensed professional counselor requirements, which outline exam and internship prerequisites.

Individuals planning a counseling career in Ohio should explore how to get an lpc license in Ohio to understand state-specific training and continuing education standards. Similarly, those looking to practice in the Pacific Northwest can review Oklahoma licensed professional counselor requirements, clarifying the steps from degree completion to license application.

Online psychology degrees not only provide flexibility but also support graduates in meeting these important licensure benchmarks, strengthening their career readiness across different states.

Best Scientists Citing J. Scott Roberts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles