World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark D. Habgood

Mark D. Habgood

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
5587
World Ranking
8794
National Ranking
263

Mark D. Habgood publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Habgood sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 97 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mark D. Habgood D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Habgood sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark D. Habgood is a researcher affiliated with Monash University in Australia. Their academic work primarily focuses on medicine, with a particular emphasis on pediatrics, perinatology, and child health. Their scholarship encompasses various subfields such as pulmonary and respiratory medicine, public health, environmental and occupational health, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The main topics of Habgood's research include pregnancy and medication impact, pharmacological effects and toxicity studies, advances in cystic fibrosis research, neonatal respiratory health research, pregnancy and preeclampsia studies, drug transport and resistance mechanisms, and epilepsy research and treatment.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Habgood include:

  • Effects of paracetamol (acetaminophen) on gene expression and permeability properties of the rat placenta and fetal brain, 2020, F1000Research
  • Entry of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance potentiator ivacaftor into the developing brain and lung, 2021, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • Fetal drug exposure after maternally administered CFTR modulators Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in a rat model, 2024, Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
  • The Balance between the Safety of Mother, Fetus, and Newborn Undergoing Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Treatments during Pregnancy, 2020, ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science

Habgood regularly collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Norman R. Saunders
  • Yifan Huang
  • Katarzyna M. Dzięgielewska
  • Fiona Qiu
  • Liam M. Koehn

Their work is frequently published in the following journals and venues:

  • F1000Research
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science

Habgood's research consistently addresses issues related to the safety and pharmacological impact of treatments during pregnancy, especially concerning fetal exposure and neonatal outcomes. Their contributions span experimental studies on drug effects in animal models, with a focus on placental and fetal brain physiology, as well as clinical contexts involving cystic fibrosis treatments during pregnancy.

Best Publications

  • Strategies to advance translational research into brain barriers

    Edward Neuwelt;N Joan Abbott;Lauren Abrey;William A Banks

  • Transient neuroprotection by minocycline following traumatic brain injury is associated with attenuated microglial activation but no changes in cell apoptosis or neutrophil infiltration

    Nicole Bye;Mark D. Habgood;Jennifer K. Callaway;Nakisa Malakooti

  • Markers for blood-brain barrier integrity: how appropriate is Evans blue in the twenty-first century and what are the alternatives?

    Norman R. Saunders;Katarzyna M. Dziegielewska;Kjeld Møllgård;Mark D. Habgood

  • Development of the choroid plexus.

    K.M. Dziegielewska;J. Ek;M.D. Habgood;N.R. Saunders

  • Changes in blood-brain barrier permeability to large and small molecules following traumatic brain injury in mice

    M. D. Habgood;N. Bye;K. M. Dziegielewska;C. J. Ek

  • Barriers in the brain: a renaissance?

    Norman R. Saunders;C. Joakim Ek;Mark D. Habgood;Katarzyna M. Dziegielewska

  • The rights and wrongs of blood-brain barrier permeability studies: a walk through 100 years of history

    Norman R. Saunders;Jean-Jacques Dreifuss;Katarzyna M. Dziegielewska;Pia A. Johansson

  • Barriers in the developing brain and Neurotoxicology

    C. Joakim Ek;Katarzyna M. Dziegielewska;Mark D. Habgood;Norman R. Saunders

  • Determinants of passive drug entry into the central nervous system.

    M. D. Habgood;D. J. Begley;N. J. Abbott

  • The biological significance of brain barrier mechanisms: help or hindrance in drug delivery to the central nervous system?

    Norman R. Saunders;Mark D. Habgood;Kjeld Møllgård;Katarzyna M. Dziegielewska

  • Physiology and molecular biology of barrier mechanisms in the fetal and neonatal brain.

    Norman R. Saunders;Norman R. Saunders;Katarzyna M. Dziegielewska;Katarzyna M. Dziegielewska;Kjeld Møllgård;Kjeld Møllgård;Mark D. Habgood;Mark D. Habgood

  • A developmentally regulated blood-cerebrospinal fluid transfer mechanism for albumin in immature rats.

    M. D. Habgood;J. E. C. Sedgwick;K. M. Dziegielewska;N. R. Saunders

  • Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier to proteins in white matter of the developing brain following systemic inflammation.

    Helen Stolp;K M Dziegielewska;C J Ek;M D Habgood

  • The inner CSF-brain barrier: developmentally controlled access to the brain via intercellular junctions.

    Sophie Whish;Katarzyna M. Dziegielewska;Kjeld Møllgård;Natassya M. Noor

  • Spatio-temporal progression of grey and white matter damage following contusion injury in rat spinal cord.

    C. Joakim Ek;Mark D. Habgood;Jennifer K. Callaway;Ross Dennis

  • Blood-CSF barrier function in the rat embryo.

    P A Johansson;K M Dziegielewska;C J Ek;M D Habgood

  • Structural characteristics and barrier properties of the choroid plexuses in developing brain of the opossum (Monodelphis Domestica).

    Carl Joakim Ek;Mark David Habgood;Katarzyna Magdalena Dziegielewska;Norman Ruthven Saunders

  • Oligodendrocyte birth and death following traumatic brain injury in adult mice

    Krista A. Dent;Kimberly J. Christie;Nicole Bye;Harleen S. Basrai

  • Investigation into the correlation between the structure of hydroxypyridinones and blood-brain barrier permeability.

    Mark D Habgood;Zu Dong Liu;Lotfollah S Dehkordi;Hicham H Khodr

  • THE NATURE OF THE DECREASE IN BLOOD CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID BARRIER EXCHANGE DURING POSTNATAL BRAIN-DEVELOPMENT IN THE RAT

    M D Habgood;G W Knott;K M Dziegielewska;N R Saunders

Frequent Co-Authors

Norman R. Saunders
Norman R. Saunders Monash University
Katarzyna M. Dziegielewska
Katarzyna M. Dziegielewska University of Melbourne
Kjeld Møllgård
Kjeld Møllgård University of Copenhagen
Shane A. Liddelow
Shane A. Liddelow New York University
John B. Furness
John B. Furness Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Graham Knott
Graham Knott École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Glenn F. King
Glenn F. King University of Queensland
Chris Manzie
Chris Manzie University of Melbourne
W. Dalton Dietrich
W. Dalton Dietrich University of Miami
Ann M. Turnley
Ann M. Turnley University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to diverse careers in healthcare, research, and counseling. Many students pursue graduate qualifications for deeper specialization. For example, those interested in clinical practice can consider psy d programs that focus on applied psychology and clinical skills.

If your interest leans toward family or relationship therapy, the mft program provides a pathway to become a Marriage and Family Therapist—often with flexible, accelerated options online.

For those seeking the fastest route to a degree, many universities now offer a bachelor degree online in 2 years, ideal for career changers or those eager to enter the job market quickly.

As you weigh your choices, consider how your major impacts future earnings. Explore the highest paid degrees to discover which fields offer the greatest financial rewards, helping you align your passion for neuroscience with real-world opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. Habgood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles