World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 73 1932 1747 1133 1001 277 26813

Toni C. Antonucci publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Toni C. Antonucci between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Toni C. Antonucci published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2019. 32 of the 334 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2019. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 9 publications
1970 2025

334 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Toni C. Antonucci: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 2
1982 1
1983 3
1984 3
1985 1
1986 3
1987 4
1988 3
1989 6
1990 6
1991 4
1992 3
1993 3
1994 6
1995 1
1996 3
1997 7
1998 7
1999 5
2000 3
2001 8
2002 5
2003 4
2004 4
2005 6
2006 5
2007 6
2008 6
2009 3
2010 9
2011 5
2012 12
2013 5
2014 7
2015 9
2016 9
2017 16
2018 21
2019 26
2020 14
2021 8
2022 18
2023 15
2024 23
2025 9
Total 334
Download as CSV

Toni C. Antonucci publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Toni C. Antonucci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 277 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 277
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Toni C. Antonucci D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Toni C. Antonucci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 73
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1990 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Toni C. Antonucci is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple aspects of social sciences and psychology, focusing particularly on areas such as health disparities and outcomes, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, dementia and cognitive impairment research, aging and gerontology research, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, migration, health and trauma, and employment and welfare studies.

Their work is frequently published in venues including Innovation in Aging, The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Alzheimer's & Dementia, Journal of Aging and Health, and The Gerontologist.

Antonucci's recent notable publications include:

  • Understanding the effects of Covid-19 through a life course lens, 2020, Advances in Life Course Research
  • The Convoy Model and Later-Life Family Relationships, 2020, Journal of Family Theory & Review
  • The Strength of Weaker Ties: An Underexplored Resource for Maintaining Emotional Well-Being in Later Life, 2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Volunteering and health: The role of social network change, 2021, Social Science & Medicine
  • Gender differences in countries' adaptation to societal ageing: an international cross-sectional comparison, 2021, The Lancet Healthy Longevity

Their research collaborations often involve co-authors such as Kristine J. Ajrouch, Laura B. Zahodne, Noah Webster, Simon Brauer, and Rita Hu.

Antonucci has contributed extensively to topics such as health, sociology and political science, clinical psychology, general health professions, and social psychology.

The scientist has been recognized by fellowships including the Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) awarded in 2013, and Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) awarded in 1990.

Best Publications

  • Convoys over the life course: attachment, roles, and social support

    R.L. Kahn;T.C. Antonucci

  • Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of the convoy model.

    Toni C. Antonucci;Hiroko Akiyama

  • An examination of sex differences in social support among older men and women

    Toni C. Antonucci;Hiroko Akiyama

  • Social Network Typologies and Mental Health Among Older Adults

    Katherine L. Fiori;Toni C. Antonucci;Kai S. Cortina

  • Differences in life expectancy due to race and educational differences are widening, and many may not catch up.

    S. Jay Olshansky;Toni C. Antonucci;Lisa F. Berkman;Robert H. Binstock

  • Social relations: An examination of social networks, social support, and sense of control.

    Toni C. Antonucci

  • The Convoy Model: Explaining Social Relations From a Multidisciplinary Perspective

    Toni C. Antonucci;Kristine J. Ajrouch;Kira S. Birditt

  • Gender differences in the link between marital support and satisfaction in older couples.

    Linda K. Acitelli;Toni C. Antonucci

  • Social Networks Among Blacks and Whites The Interaction Between Race and Age

    Kristine J. Ajrouch;Toni C. Antonucci;Mary R. Janevic

  • Social Networks Among Men and Women: The Effects of Age and Socioeconomic Status

    Kristine J. Ajrouch;Alysia Y. Blandon;Toni C. Antonucci

  • Social Network Types Among Older Adults: A Multidimensional Approach

    Katherine L. Fiori;Jacqui Smith;Toni C. Antonucci

  • Attachment and close relationships across the life span.

    Toni C Antonucci;Hiroko Akiyama;Keiko Takahashi

  • Veridicality of social support: A comparison of principal and network members' responses.

    Toni C. Antonucci;Barbara A. Israel

  • The role of reciprocity in social support.

    Toni C. Antonucci;James S. Jackson

  • Age Differences in Productive Activities

    A. R. Herzog;R. L. Kahn;J. N. Morgan;J. S. Jackson

  • Social support, interpersonal efficacy, and health: A life course perspective.

    Toni C. Antonucci;James S. Jackson

  • Social Support: Theoretical Advances, Recent Findings and Pressing Issues

    Toni C. Antonucci

  • Convoys of social relations: Family and friendships within a life span context.

    Toni C. Antonucci;Hiroko Akiyama

  • Understanding the Effects of COVID-19 Through a Life Course Lens

    Richard A. Settersten;Laura Bernardi;Juho Härkönen;Toni C. Antonucci

  • Negative effects of close social relations

    Toni C. Antonucci;Hiroko Akiyama;Jennifer E. Lansford

Frequent Co-Authors

Kristine J. Ajrouch
Kristine J. Ajrouch University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kira S. Birditt
Kira S. Birditt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James S. Jackson
James S. Jackson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jacqui Smith
Jacqui Smith University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jennifer E. Lansford
Jennifer E. Lansford Duke University
Jean-François Dartigues
Jean-François Dartigues University of Bordeaux
Eleanor Singer
Eleanor Singer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Laura B. Zahodne
Laura B. Zahodne University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Cleopatra H. Caldwell
Cleopatra H. Caldwell University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lisa F. Berkman
Lisa F. Berkman Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a variety of accessible options for prospective students across the USA. Many universities now offer flexible, accredited programs that allow you to balance your studies with work or other commitments. As psychology continues to be a popular and versatile major, it’s important to consider both the quality and affordability of the programs available.

Cost is a major factor for most students. If you are interested in studying in California, you might want to review some of the affordable psychology programs in San Diego. In Florida, there are several most affordable psychology degree programs in Tampa to consider. Likewise, Alabama offers affordable psychology programs in Tuscaloosa for students seeking value and quality. For those based in the southwest, exploring the cheapest psychology degrees in Texas can help you make a cost-effective choice.

With an online psychology degree, graduates can pursue pathways in counseling, human resources, healthcare, research, and more. Whether you plan to advance academically or enter the workforce right after graduation, affordable online programs can make your career ambitions in psychology more attainable.

Best Scientists Citing Toni C. Antonucci

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles