World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
33368
World Ranking
9314
National Ranking
4804

Psychology

D-Index
98
Citations
33277
World Ranking
683
National Ranking
429

Paul R. Duberstein publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Duberstein sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 366 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul R. Duberstein D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Duberstein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul R. Duberstein is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily spans multiple fields related to health, medicine, and psychology, with a notable focus on public health, clinical psychology, and health professions.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Health Professions
  • Psychology

Subfields in which they have published extensively cover:

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • General Health Professions
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Oncology

Duberstein's research addresses several significant topics such as:

  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Cancer Survivorship and Care
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

Their recent papers highlight various aspects of clinical and psychological health:

  • Assessment of Financial Toxicity Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Dialysis Regret, 2020, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Associations of Uncertainty With Psychological Health and Quality of Life in Older Adults With Advanced Cancer, 2020, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • Aging and Engaging: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Conversational Skills Coach for Older Adults, 2020, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Treatment decision-making in acute myeloid leukemia: a qualitative study of older adults and community oncologists, 2020, Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paul R. Duberstein include:

  • Ronald M. Epstein
  • Supriya G. Mohile
  • Kah Poh Loh
  • Fahad Saeed
  • Huiwen Xu

The scientist's work is regularly published in venues such as:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Cancer

Best Publications

  • How Effective Are Interventions With Caregivers? An Updated Meta-Analysis

    Silvia Sörensen;Martin Pinquart;Paul Duberstein

  • Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues.

    Ronald M. Epstein;Peter Franks;Kevin Fiscella;Cleveland G. Shields

  • Depression and cancer mortality: a meta-analysis.

    M. Pinquart;P. R. Duberstein

  • Relationships of Age and Axis I Diagnoses in Victims of Completed Suicide: A Psychological Autopsy Study

    Yeates Conwell;Paul R. Duberstein;Christopher Cox;John H. Herrmann

  • Risk factors for suicide in later life

    Yeates Conwell;Paul R. Duberstein;Eric D. Caine

  • Patient Trust: Is It Related to Patient-Centered Behavior of Primary Care Physicians?

    Kevin Fiscella;Sean Meldrum;Peter Franks;Cleveland G. Shields

  • Effects of antidepressant treatment on neuroactive steroids in major depression.

    E Romeo;A Ströhle;G Spalletta;F di Michele

  • Associations of social networks with cancer mortality: a meta-analysis.

    Martin Pinquart;Paul R. Duberstein

  • Dementia care: mental health effects, intervention strategies, and clinical implications

    Silvia Sörensen;Paul Duberstein;David Gill;Martin Pinquart

  • The impact of suicide on the family

    Julie Cerel;John R Jordan;Paul R Duberstein

  • A systematic review of physical illness, functional disability, and suicidal behaviour among older adults

    Madeleine Mellqvist Fässberg;Gary Cheung;Silvia Sara Canetto;Annette Erlangsen

  • A systematic review of social factors and suicidal behavior in older adulthood

    Madeleine Mellqvist Fässberg;Kimberly A van Orden;Paul Duberstein;Annette Erlangsen

  • Treatments for later-life depressive conditions: a meta-analytic comparison of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy.

    Martin Pinquart;Paul R. Duberstein;Jeffrey M. Lyness

  • Effects of psychotherapy and other behavioral interventions on clinically depressed older adults: a meta-analysis.

    M Pinquart;PR Duberstein;JM Lyness

  • Age Differences in Behaviors Leading to Completed Suicide

    Yeates Conwell;Paul R. Duberstein;Christopher Cox;John Herrmann

  • Effect of a Patient-Centered Communication Intervention on Oncologist-Patient Communication, Quality of Life, and Health Care Utilization in Advanced Cancer: The VOICE Randomized Clinical Trial

    Ronald M. Epstein;Paul R. Duberstein;Joshua J. Fenton;Kevin Fiscella

  • Sexual Orientation and Risk Factors for Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts Among Adolescents and Young Adults

    Vincent M.B. Silenzio;Juan B. Pena;Paul R. Duberstein;Julie Cerel

  • Psychological vulnerability to completed suicide: a review of empirical studies

    Kenneth R. Conner;Paul R. Duberstein;Yeates Conwell;Larry Seidlitz

  • Gender differences in Five Factor Model personality traits in an elderly cohort

    Benjamin P. Chapman;Paul R. Duberstein;Silvia Sörensen;Jeffrey M. Lyness

  • Completed suicide among older patients in primary care practices: a controlled study

    Yeates Conwell;Jeffrey M. Lyness;Paul Duberstein;Christopher Cox

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald M. Epstein
Ronald M. Epstein University of Rochester Medical Center
Yeates Conwell
Yeates Conwell University of Rochester Medical Center
Benjamin P. Chapman
Benjamin P. Chapman University of Rochester Medical Center
Supriya G. Mohile
Supriya G. Mohile University of Rochester Medical Center
Michael Hoerger
Michael Hoerger Tulane University
Marnin J. Heisel
Marnin J. Heisel University of Western Ontario
Kenneth R. Conner
Kenneth R. Conner University of Rochester Medical Center
Jeffrey M. Lyness
Jeffrey M. Lyness University of Rochester Medical Center
Richard L. Kravitz
Richard L. Kravitz University of California, Davis
Kevin Fiscella
Kevin Fiscella University of Rochester Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens up diverse career paths across counseling, research, and social work. Online degrees are increasingly popular for those balancing education with work or personal commitments, providing flexibility while meeting state-specific requirements for professional roles.

Social work is a common pathway for psychology graduates. The degree needed to be a social worker in Florida typically includes earning a bachelor’s or master’s in social work and fulfilling state licensing criteria. Requirements can vary widely; for instance, aspiring professionals should review social worker degree requirements in Georgia to ensure they select an accredited program.

If you’re considering practicing outside the mainland, be sure to explore Hawaii education requirements for social workers as these may differ from typical continental US standards. Likewise, those interested in the Northwest can refer to Idaho education requirements for social workers for localized information.

Understanding these requirements early supports informed decisions about the best online degree for your intended career path, ensuring you are prepared for licensing and future opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Paul R. Duberstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles