World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Sweden
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 119 3887 3640 76 72 662 54409

Ingmar Skoog publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ingmar Skoog between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ingmar Skoog published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 22.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 51 publications in 2021. 64 of the 758 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 51. Peak 51 publications in 2021. 1992: 4 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 11 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 32 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 44 publications 2018: 47 publications 2019: 39 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 51 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 48 publications 2024: 43 publications 2025: 21 publications
1992 2025

758 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ingmar Skoog: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 4
1993 7
1994 4
1995 1
1996 11
1997 6
1998 7
1999 12
2000 14
2001 12
2002 15
2003 16
2004 32
2005 24
2006 19
2007 13
2008 18
2009 15
2010 24
2011 21
2012 19
2013 21
2014 28
2015 22
2016 25
2017 44
2018 47
2019 39
2020 41
2021 51
2022 34
2023 48
2024 43
2025 21
Total 758
Download as CSV

Ingmar Skoog publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingmar Skoog sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 661–680 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 662 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340 662
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ingmar Skoog D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingmar Skoog sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302 119
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Sweden Leader Award

Overview

Ingmar Skoog is affiliated with the University of Gothenburg in Sweden and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine, with specific work in Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Neurology, and Health. Their research encompasses diverse topics related to dementia and cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, nutrition, and health disparities.

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Diet and Metabolism Studies

Frequent co-authors in Skoog's publications include Silke Kern, Anna Zettergren, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg, and Eric Westman. These collaborations indicate an active network within the related fields of neuroscience and geriatric medicine.

Ingmar Skoog has contributed numerous papers to several high-profile publication venues. The venues where Skoog has frequently published include:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Cerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior
  • International Psychogeriatrics
  • Research Square
  • BMC Geriatrics

Some of the recent papers credited to or involving Ingmar Skoog include:

  • "A genome-wide association study with 1,126,563 individuals identifies new risk loci for Alzheimer's disease" (2021) published in Nature Genetics
  • "Tackling challenges in care of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias amid the COVID-19 pandemic, now and in the future" (2020) published in Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Association of Systolic Blood Pressure With Dementia Risk and the Role of Age, U-Shaped Associations, and Mortality" (2021) published in JAMA Internal Medicine
  • "Mass spectrometric simultaneous quantification of tau species in plasma shows differential associations with amyloid and tau pathologies" (2023) published in Nature Aging
  • "Associations between social connections and cognition: a global collaborative individual participant data meta-analysis" (2022) published in The Lancet Healthy Longevity

Best Publications

  • 15-year longitudinal study of blood pressure and dementia

    I Skoog;L Nilsson;G Persson;B Lernfelt

  • The Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE): principal results of a randomized double-blind intervention trial.

    Hans Lithell;Lennart Hansson;Ingmar Skoog;Dag Elmfeldt

  • A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms

    Töres Theorell;Töres Theorell;Anne Hammarström;Gunnar Aronsson;Lil Träskman Bendz

  • An 18-year follow-up of overweight and risk of Alzheimer disease.

    Deborah Gustafson;Elisabet Rothenberg;Kaj Blennow;Bertil Steen

  • Development of the EURO-D scale--a European, Union initiative to compare symptoms of depression in 14 European centres.

    M. J. Prince;F. Reischies;A. T. F. Beekman;R. Fuhrer

  • A population-based study of dementia in 85-year-olds.

    Ingmar Skoog;Lars Nilsson;Bo Palmertz;Lars-Arne Andreasson

  • A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and burnout symptoms

    Gunnar Aronsson;Töres Theorell;Töres Theorell;Tom Grape;Anne Hammarström

  • Diagnostic criteria for vascular cognitive disorders: a VASCOG statement.

    Perminder Sachdev;Raj Kalaria;John O'Brien;Ingmar Skoog

  • A 40-Year Follow-up of Patients With Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

    Gunnar Skoog;Ingmar Skoog

  • The changing prevalence and incidence of dementia over time — current evidence

    Yu Tzu Wu;Alexa S. Beiser;Monique M.B. Breteler;Laura Fratiglioni

  • Vascular dysfunction-The disregarded partner of Alzheimer's disease

    Melanie D. Sweeney;Axel Montagne;Abhay P. Sagare;Daniel A. Nation

  • Prevalence of depression and its treatment in an elderly population: the Cache County study.

    David C. Steffens;Ingmar Skoog;Ingmar Skoog;Maria C. Norton;Andrea D. Hart

  • Relative fitness and frailty of elderly men and women in developed countries and their relationship with mortality

    Arnold Mitnitski;Xiaowei Song;Ingmar Skoog;GA Broe

  • Vascular cognitive impairment.

    Wiesje M van der Flier;Ingmar Skoog;Julie A Schneider;Leonardo Pantoni

  • High total cholesterol levels in late life associated with a reduced risk of dementia

    Michelle M. Mielke;P. P. Zandi;Magnus Sjögren;Magnus Sjögren;D. Gustafson;D. Gustafson

  • Long-term risks of death and institutionalization of elderly people in relation to deficit accumulation at age 70

    Kenneth Rockwood;Arnold Mitnitski;Xiaowei Song;Bertil Steen

  • Tau and Abeta42 in cerebrospinal fluid from healthy adults 21-93 years of age: establishment of reference values.

    Magnus Sjögren;Hugo Vanderstichele;Hans Ågren;Olof Zachrisson

  • APOE-ε4 count predicts age when prevalence of AD increases, then declines: The Cache County Study

    J. C. S. Breitner;B. W. Wyse;J. C. Anthony;K. A. Welsh-Bohmer

  • Dementia in western Europe: epidemiological evidence and implications for policy making.

    Yu-Tzu Wu;Laura Fratiglioni;Fiona E Matthews;Fiona E Matthews;Antonio Lobo

Frequent Co-Authors

Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Henrik Zetterberg
Henrik Zetterberg University of Gothenburg
Boo Johansson
Boo Johansson University of Gothenburg
Anders Wallin
Anders Wallin University of Gothenburg
Albert Hofman
Albert Hofman Harvard University
Lauren Lissner
Lauren Lissner University of Gothenburg
Miia Kivipelto
Miia Kivipelto University of Eastern Finland
Monique M.B. Breteler
Monique M.B. Breteler German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
John C.S. Breitner
John C.S. Breitner Douglas Mental Health University Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare careers beyond traditional medical school? The USA offers a host of flexible online programs for aspiring healthcare professionals. For example, accelerated direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors online allow individuals without a nursing background to earn advanced nursing credentials, often in less time.

Nursing continues to be a popular career choice, and finding a school that fits your needs is crucial. Some candidates prefer easy nursing schools to get into to increase their chances of admission and begin their studies without delay. Others may seek out programs that do not require traditional entrance exams, and it's essential to know whether do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school before applying.

Not all healthcare careers require years of study. Medical billing and coding is a rewarding pathway that can often be pursued entirely online. Wondering whether can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding? Many programs do offer financial support, making this a more accessible career option.

Best Scientists Citing Ingmar Skoog

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles