World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
4590
World Ranking
8971
National Ranking
19

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
4631
World Ranking
8632
National Ranking
36

Karolina Janacsek publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karolina Janacsek sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 141 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Karolina Janacsek D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karolina Janacsek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karolina Janacsek is affiliated with Eötvös Loránd University in Hungary. Their research spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a significant focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The scientist's work covers diverse topics including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research

Janacsek has published extensively in several journals, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 11 publications
  • Scientific Reports with 8 publications
  • Preprints.org with 4 publications
  • Cortex with 3 publications
  • npj Science of Learning with 3 publications

Several recent papers showcase the scientist's research focus and findings. These include:

  • "The relationship between subjective sleep quality and cognitive performance in healthy young adults: Evidence from three empirical studies", 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "When less is more: Enhanced statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies after disruption of bilateral DLPFC", 2020, Journal of Memory and Language
  • "Subcortical Cognition: The Fruit Below the Rind", 2022, Annual Review of Neuroscience
  • "Cautious or causal? Key implicit sequence learning paradigms should not be overlooked when assessing the role of DLPFC (Commentary on Prutean et al.)", 2021, Cortex
  • "The complexity of measuring reliability in learning tasks: An illustration using the Alternating Serial Reaction Time Task", 2023, Behavior Research Methods

Frequent collaborators contributing to Janacsek's research outputs include:

  • Dezső Németh
  • Teodóra Vékony
  • Andrea Kóbor
  • Ádám Takács
  • Eszter Tóth-Fáber

Best Publications

  • The best time to acquire new skills: Age-related differences in implicit sequence learning across the human lifespan

    Karolina Janacsek;József Fiser;Dezso Nemeth

  • Sleep has no critical role in implicit motor sequence learning in young and old adults.

    Dezso Nemeth;Dezso Nemeth;Karolina Janacsek;Zsuzsa Londe;Michael T. Ullman

  • The neurocognition of developmental disorders of language

    Michael T. Ullman;F. Sayako Earle;Matthew Walenski;Karolina Janacsek;Karolina Janacsek

  • Age-dependent and coordinated shift in performance between implicit and explicit skill learning

    Dezso Nemeth;Karolina Janacsek;József Fiser

  • Implicit sequence learning and working memory: Correlated or complicated?

    Karolina Janacsek;Dezso Nemeth;Dezso Nemeth

  • Boosting Human Learning by Hypnosis

    Dezso Nemeth;Karolina Janacsek;Bertalan Polner;Zoltan Ambrus Kovacs

  • Learning in autism: implicitly superb.

    Dezso Nemeth;Karolina Janacsek;Virag Balogh;Zsuzsa Londe

  • Sequence learning in the human brain: A functional neuroanatomical meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies

    Karolina Janacsek;Karolina Janacsek;Karolina Janacsek;Kyle F. Shattuck;Kaitlyn M. Tagarelli;Jarrad A.G. Lum

  • The Dynamics of Implicit Skill Consolidation in Young and Elderly Adults

    Dezso Nemeth;Karolina Janacsek

  • Predicting the future: from implicit learning to consolidation.

    Karolina Janacsek;Dezso Nemeth

  • Subcortical Cognition: The Fruit Below the Rind.

    Unknown

  • Both the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception are modulated in a frequency-specific manner during transcranial alternating current stimulation

    Zs. Turi;G.G. Ambrus;K. Janacsek;K. Janacsek;K. Emmert

  • Competition between frontal lobe functions and implicit sequence learning: evidence from the long-term effects of alcohol

    Marta Virag;Karolina Janacsek;Aniko Horvath;Zoltan Bujdoso

  • Statistical learning leads to persistent memory: Evidence for one-year consolidation.

    Andrea Kóbor;Karolina Janacsek;Ádám Takács;Dezso Nemeth;Dezso Nemeth

  • Deconstructing Procedural Memory: Different Learning Trajectories and Consolidation of Sequence and Statistical Learning.

    Peter Simor;Zsofia Zavecz;Zsofia Zavecz;Kata Horváth;Kata Horváth;Noémi Éltető

  • The relationship between subjective sleep quality and cognitive performance in healthy young adults: Evidence from three empirical studies.

    Zsófia Zavecz;Zsófia Zavecz;Tamás Nagy;Adrienn Galkó;Dezso Nemeth;Dezso Nemeth;Dezso Nemeth

  • The differential consolidation of perceptual and motor learning in skill acquisition.

    Emese Hallgató;Dóra Győri-Dani;Judit Pekár;Karolina Janacsek

  • When less is more: Enhanced statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies after disruption of bilateral DLPFC

    Géza Gergely Ambrus;Teodóra Vékony;Karolina Janacsek;Karolina Janacsek;Karolina Janacsek;Anna B.C. Trimborn

  • ERPs differentiate the sensitivity to statistical probabilities and the learning of sequential structures during procedural learning

    Andrea Kóbor;Ádám Takács;Zsófia Kardos;Zsófia Kardos;Karolina Janacsek;Karolina Janacsek

  • Dynamics of EEG functional connectivity during statistical learning

    Brigitta Tóth;Karolina Janacsek;Ádám Takács;Andrea Kóbor

  • Interference between sentence processing and probabilistic implicit sequence learning.

    Dezso Nemeth;Karolina Janacsek;Gabor Csifcsak;Gabor Szvoboda

Frequent Co-Authors

Dezso Nemeth
Dezso Nemeth Eötvös Loránd University
László Vécsei
László Vécsei University of Szeged
Valéria Csépe
Valéria Csépe Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Michael T. Ullman
Michael T. Ullman Georgetown University
Xenia Gonda
Xenia Gonda Semmelweis University
Péter Klivényi
Péter Klivényi University of Szeged
James H. Howard
James H. Howard Catholic University of America
Szabolcs Kéri
Szabolcs Kéri Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Andrea Antal
Andrea Antal University of Göttingen
Walter Paulus
Walter Paulus University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, a variety of online degrees in related fields can help expand career options. Many learners consider programs in counseling, psychology, or therapy to complement neuroscience studies. When selecting a graduate path, accreditation is crucial. For those prioritizing rigorous standards and licensure, explore cacrep accredited programs to ensure your degree has lasting value in clinical or counseling settings.

Affordability is another key factor in choosing the right degree. Fortunately, some of the cheapest mental health counseling degree options online can make advanced education accessible without heavy debt. Those interested in family or relationship therapy should look for an online masters in marriage and family therapy, which trains graduates for specialized practice with couples and families.

If you're considering advancing in psychology, you may wonder, how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology? Costs vary, so compare tuition and financial aid options carefully. Each of these paths can prepare neuroscience graduates for fulfilling roles in research, clinical practice, or counseling—all essential in today’s multidisciplinary healthcare and science sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Karolina Janacsek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles