World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 42 4800 4444 2274 2068 123 6525

Heather L. McCauley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Heather L. McCauley between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Heather L. McCauley published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2015. 4 of the 137 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2015. 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
2010 2025

137 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Heather L. McCauley: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 8
2011 10
2012 6
2013 7
2014 16
2015 19
2016 8
2017 11
2018 13
2019 9
2020 9
2021 7
2022 5
2023 5
2024 3
2025 1
Total 137
Download as CSV

Heather L. McCauley publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heather L. McCauley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 123 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 123
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Heather L. McCauley D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heather L. McCauley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313 42
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1954 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Heather L. McCauley is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the social sciences and psychology, with a focus on gender studies, sociology and political science, health, clinical psychology, and social psychology.

Their scholarly work centers on several key topics, including:

  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Sex work and related issues
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media

Heather L. McCauley has contributed to numerous publications, frequently appearing in journals such as:

  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Prevention Science
  • The Journal of Sex Research
  • Journal of Adolescent Health
  • The Handbook of Systemic Family Therapy

Selected recent papers include:

  • Prevention of sexual violence among college students: Current challenges and future directions (2020), published in Journal of American College Health
  • Bystander Program Effectiveness to Reduce Violence and Violence Acceptance Within Sexual Minority Male and Female High School Students Using a Cluster RCT (2020), published in Prevention Science
  • Reproductive coercion, intimate partner violence, and pregnancy risk among adolescent women with a history of foster care involvement (2020), published in Children and Youth Services Review
  • Campus sexual assault climate: Toward an expanded definition and improved assessment. (2021), published in Psychology of Violence
  • Slutpage Use Among U.S. College Students: The Secret and Social Platforms of Image-Based Sexual Abuse (2021), published in Archives of Sexual Behavior

Frequent collaborators in Heather L. McCauley's research include:

  • Morgan E. PettyJohn
  • Elizabeth Miller
  • Taylor A. Reid
  • Megan K. Maas
  • Antonia Abbey

Their contributions have been recognized in the form of awards such as the Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), awarded in 1954.

Best Publications

  • Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy ☆

    Elizabeth Miller;Michele R. Decker;Heather L. McCauley;Daniel J. Tancredi

  • “Coaching Boys into Men”: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dating Violence Prevention Program

    Elizabeth Miller;Daniel J. Tancredi;Heather L. McCauley;Michele R. Decker

  • Prevalence of Past-Year Sexual Assault Victimization Among Undergraduate Students: Exploring Differences by and Intersections of Gender Identity, Sexual Identity, and Race/Ethnicity

    Robert W. S. Coulter;Christina Mair;Elizabeth Miller;John R. Blosnich;John R. Blosnich

  • A family planning clinic partner violence intervention to reduce risk associated with reproductive coercion

    Elizabeth Miller;Michele R. Decker;Heather L. McCauley;Daniel J. Tancredi

  • Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clients

    Elizabeth Miller;Heather L. McCauley;Daniel J. Tancredi;Michele R. Decker

  • One-year follow-up of a coach-delivered dating violence prevention program: A cluster randomized controlled trial

    Elizabeth Miller;Daniel J. Tancredi;Heather L. McCauley;Michele R. Decker

  • Sex trafficking, sexual risk, sexually transmitted infection and reproductive health among female sex workers in Thailand

    Michele R Decker;Heather L McCauley;Dusita Phuengsamran;Surang Janyam

  • Cyber Dating Abuse Among Teens Using School-Based Health Centers

    Rebecca N. Dick;Heather L. McCauley;Kelley A. Jones;Daniel J. Tancredi

  • Violence victimisation, sexual risk and sexually transmitted infection symptoms among female sex workers in Thailand

    Michele R Decker;Heather L McCauley;Dusita Phuengsamran;Surang Janyam

  • #HowIWillChange: Engaging men and boys in the #MeToo movement.

    Morgan E. PettyJohn;Finneran K. Muzzey;Megan K. Maas;Heather L. McCauley

  • Coercive Forms of Sexual Risk and Associated Violence Perpetrated by Male Partners of Female Adolescents

    Jay G. Silverman;Heather L. Mccauley;Michele R. Decker;Elizabeth Miller

  • A family planning clinic-based intervention to address reproductive coercion: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

    Elizabeth Miller;Daniel J. Tancredi;Michele R. Decker;Heather L. McCauley

  • #MyDepressionLooksLike: Examining Public Discourse About Depression on Twitter

    E Megan Lachmar;Andrea K Wittenborn;Katherine W Bogen;Heather L McCauley

  • Recent partner violence and sexual and drug-related STI/HIV risk among adolescent and young adult women attending family planning clinics

    Michele R Decker;Elizabeth Miller;Heather L McCauley;Daniel J Tancredi

  • Gender-Equitable Attitudes, Bystander Behavior, and Recent Abuse Perpetration Against Heterosexual Dating Partners of Male High School Athletes

    Heather L. McCauley;Daniel J. Tancredi;Jay G. Silverman;Michele R. Decker

  • A School Health Center Intervention for Abusive Adolescent Relationships: A Cluster RCT

    Elizabeth Miller;Sandi Goldstein;Heather L. McCauley;Kelley A. Jones

  • Use of Reproductive and Sexual Health Services Among Female Family Planning Clinic Clients Exposed to Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion

    Traci Kazmerski;Heather L. McCauley;Kelley Jones;Sonya Borrero;Sonya Borrero

  • Evaluation of a Gender-Based Violence Prevention Program for Student Athletes in Mumbai, India

    Elizabeth Miller;Madhumita Das;Daniel J. Tancredi;Heather L. McCauley

  • Race and reproductive coercion: a qualitative assessment.

    Cara Nikolajski;Elizabeth Miller;Heather L. McCauley;Aletha Akers

  • Original research article Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy ☆

    Elizabeth Miller;Michele R. Decker;Heather L. McCauley;Daniel J. Tancredi

Frequent Co-Authors

Michele R. Decker
Michele R. Decker Johns Hopkins University
Jay G. Silverman
Jay G. Silverman University of California, San Diego
Daniel J. Tancredi
Daniel J. Tancredi University of California, Davis
Elizabeth Miller
Elizabeth Miller London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Michael P. Marshal
Michael P. Marshal University of Pittsburgh
Anita Raj
Anita Raj University of California, San Diego
S. Bryn Austin
S. Bryn Austin Harvard University
Robert W. S. Coulter
Robert W. S. Coulter University of Pittsburgh
Jhumka Gupta
Jhumka Gupta George Mason University
Kathryn L. Falb
Kathryn L. Falb Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in the Social Sciences and Humanities, a variety of flexible online degrees can help start or advance your career. Popular options include accelerated programs, which allow you to finish your studies faster while maintaining academic rigor and professional standards.

If your goal is to work in social services, an accelerated masters in social work offers a fast-track route to impactful roles in healthcare, schools, or community organizations. Those fascinated by human behavior should consider accelerated psychology degree programs online, which can lead to diverse opportunities from research to counseling.

If you're pursuing a career in professional counseling, it is crucial to enroll in cacrep accredited programs. CACREP accreditation ensures your degree meets industry standards–important for licensure and employment. Another popular field is marriage and family therapy; affordable online options make gaining an mft degree more accessible and help prepare you for a variety of specialized therapy careers.

These online pathways offer flexible scheduling, diverse specializations, and strong career prospects, making them ideal for working adults and recent graduates alike.

Best Scientists Citing Heather L. McCauley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles