World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
9565
World Ranking
6319
National Ranking
160

Laurens Ganzeveld publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurens Ganzeveld sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 136 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Laurens Ganzeveld D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurens Ganzeveld sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laurens Ganzeveld is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant emphasis on Environmental Science. The main subfields they contribute to include Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, General Health Professions, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

Their work covers a wide range of topics within atmospheric and environmental sciences, notably atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, plant responses to elevated CO2, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, and climate change and permafrost.

Ganzeveld has published extensively in several scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Faraday Discussions
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Some of their recent academic papers are:

  • "Overview of the MOSAiC expedition: Atmosphere," 2022, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • "Ozone deposition impact assessments for forest canopies require accurate ozone flux partitioning on diurnal timescales," 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Role of oceanic ozone deposition in explaining temporal variability in surface ozone at High Arctic sites," 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Evaluation of nitrogen oxides (NO x) sources and sinks and ozone production in Colombia and surrounding areas," 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "A single-point modeling approach for the intercomparison and evaluation of ozone dry deposition across chemical transport models (Activity 2 of AQMEII4)," 2023, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Ganzeveld frequently collaborates with several co-authors including Detlev Helmig, Maarten Krol, A.J. Visser, Johannes G. M. Barten, and Byron Blomquist.

Best Publications

  • The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM

    P. Stier;J. Feichter;S. Kinne;S. Kloster

  • Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical forest

    J. Lelieveld;T. M. Butler;J. N. Crowley;T. J. Dillon

  • Uncertainties in climate responses to past land cover change: First results from the LUCID intercomparison study

    A. J. Pitman;N. de Noblet-Ducoudré;F. T. Cruz;E. L. Davin;E. L. Davin

  • The atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: consistent simulation of ozone from the surface to the mesosphere

    P. Jöckel;H. Tost;A. Pozzer;C. Brühl

  • Overview of the MOSAiC expedition—Atmosphere

    Unknown

  • Recent Trends in Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Regional Trends 1970-2000 and Spatial Distribution of Key Sources in 2000

    J.G.J. Olivier;J.A. van Aardenne;F. Dentener;V. Pagliari

  • Dry deposition parameterization in a chemistry general circulation model and its influence on the distribution of reactive trace gases.

    Laurens Ganzeveld;Jos Lelieveld

  • Technical Note: An implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy)

    A. Kerkweg;J. Buchholz;L.N. Ganzeveld;A. Pozzer

  • Isoprene and monoterpene fluxes from Central Amazonian rainforest inferred from tower-based and airborne measurements, and implications on the atmospheric chemistry and the local carbon budget

    U. Kuhn;M.O. Andreae;C. Ammann;A.C. Araújo

  • A dry deposition parameterization for sulfur oxides in a chemistry and general circulation model

    Laurens Ganzeveld;Jos Lelieveld;Geert-Jan Roelofs

  • Recent trends in global greenhouse gas emissions: regional trends and spatial distribution of key sources

    J.G.J. Olivier;J.A. van Aardenne;F. Dentener;L.N. Ganzeveld

  • Global soil-biogenic NOx emissions and the role of canopy processes

    L. N. Ganzeveld;J. Lelieveld;F. J. Dentener;M. C. Krol

  • Impact of future land use and land cover changes on atmospheric chemistry-climate interactions

    Laurens Ganzeveld;Laurens Ganzeveld;Lex Bouwman;Elke Stehfest;Detlef P. van Vuuren

  • Atmosphere‐ocean ozone exchange: A global modeling study of biogeochemical, atmospheric, and waterside turbulence dependencies

    L.N. Ganzeveld;L.N. Ganzeveld;D. Helmig;C.W. Fairall;J. Hare

  • Estimation of atmospheric nutrient inputs to the Atlantic Ocean from 50°N to 50°S based on large-scale field sampling: Fixed nitrogen and dry deposition of phosphorus

    A.R. Baker;T. Lesworth;C. Adams;T.D. Jickells

  • Estimation of atmospheric nutrient inputs to the Atlantic Ocean from 50°N to 50°S based on large‐scale field sampling: Iron and other dust‐associated elements

    A. R. Baker;Christopher Adams;T. G. Bell;T. G. Bell;T. D. Jickells

  • Simulation of global sulfate distribution and the influence on effective cloud drop radii with a coupled photochemistry sulfur cycle model

    Geert‐J A N Roelofs;Jos Lelieveld;Laurens Ganzeveld

  • Significant light and temperature dependent monoterpene emissions from European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and their potential impact on the European volatile organic compound budget

    T. Dindorf;U. Kuhn;L.N. Ganzeveld;G. Schebeske

  • The summertime Boreal forest field measurement intensive (HUMPPA-COPEC-2010): an overview of meteorological and chemical influences

    J. Williams;J. Crowley;H. Fischer;H. Harder

  • Simulating organic species with the global atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: a comparison of model results with observations

    A. Pozzer;P. Jöckel;H. Tost;R. Sander

  • Impact of Manaus City on the Amazon Green Ocean atmosphere: ozone production, precursor sensitivity and aerosol load

    U. Kuhn;L. Ganzeveld;A. Thielmann;T. Dindorf

Frequent Co-Authors

Jos Lelieveld
Jos Lelieveld Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Maarten Krol
Maarten Krol Wageningen University & Research
Detlev Helmig
Detlev Helmig Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research
Jonathan Williams
Jonathan Williams Max Planck Society
Andrea Pozzer
Andrea Pozzer Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Meinrat O. Andreae
Meinrat O. Andreae Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Christof Ammann
Christof Ammann Federal Council
J. E. Hare
J. E. Hare Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Jürgen Kesselmeier
Jürgen Kesselmeier Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Richard E. Honrath
Richard E. Honrath Michigan Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden your career opportunities within Environmental Sciences. For example, specializing in geology through online geology programs offers a strong foundation in earth processes and natural resource management. This knowledge is crucial for addressing environmental challenges like climate change and sustainability.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has become an essential tool in environmental monitoring and data analysis. Pursuing degrees at colleges with GIS programs equips students with skills to visualize and interpret spatial data, supporting better decision-making in conservation and urban planning.

For those interested in public service and environmental policy, earning a degree through top online MPA programs can prepare you to lead initiatives that promote sustainable development and resource management at governmental or nonprofit levels.

Understanding social dynamics is equally important for tackling environmental issues. A bachelors degree in sociology online offers insights into human behavior and communities, enhancing efforts to foster environmental awareness and social responsibility.

Best Scientists Citing Laurens Ganzeveld

Trending Scientists