World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
11062
World Ranking
4043
National Ranking
356

Thomas E. Salt publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas E. Salt sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 183 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Thomas E. Salt D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas E. Salt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas E. Salt is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, and aspects related to psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's work spans several main topics, including:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Epilepsy research and treatment

Thomas E. Salt has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • British Journal of Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
  • Neuronal Signaling

Selected recent publications include:

  • "Editorial: Seeing Beyond the Eye: The Brain Connection," 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "Group II metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGlu2 and mGlu3) roles in thalamic processing," 2021, British Journal of Pharmacology
  • "Modulation of circuit oscillations in the rat anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in vitro by mGlu2 metabotropic glutamate receptors and alleviation of the effects of phencyclidine-induced NMDA-receptor hypofunction," 2023, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
  • "The role of thalamic group II mGlu receptors in health and disease," 2022, Neuronal Signaling

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations include:

  • Caroline S. Copeland
  • S. Neale
  • Christine T. O. Nguyen
  • Mónica L. Acosta
  • Silvia Di Angelantonio

The research demonstrates interest in the function of metabotropic glutamate receptors, particularly group II mGlu receptors, and their roles in neural processing and modulation of brain circuits. This has implications for understanding mechanisms underlying cognitive functions and various neurological conditions.

Best Publications

  • Retinal Repair by Transplantation of Photoreceptor Precursors

    R. E. MacLaren;R. A. Pearson;A. MacNeil;R. H. Douglas

  • Targeting amyloid-β in glaucoma treatment

    Li Guo;Thomas E. Salt;Vy Luong;Nicholas Wood

  • In vitro characterization of a spontaneously immortalized human Müller cell line (MIO-M1).

    G. Astrid Limb;Thomas E. Salt;Peter M. G. Munro;Stephen E. Moss

  • Neurotransmitter candidates of somatosensory primary afferent fibres.

    T.E. Salt;R.G. Hill

  • Competitive antagonism at metabotropic glutamate receptors by (S) -4-carboxyphenylglycine and (RS) -α-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine

    Sean A. Eaton;David E. Jane;Philip L.St.J. Jones;Richard H.P. Porter

  • Complement factor H deficiency in aged mice causes retinal abnormalities and visual dysfunction

    Peter J. Coffey;Carlos Gias;Caroline J. McDermott;Peter Lundh

  • Mediation of thalamic sensory input by both NMDA receptors and non-NMDA receptors.

    T. E. Salt

  • Novel allosteric antagonists shed light on mglu(5) receptors and CNS disorders.

    Will P.J.M. Spooren;Fabrizio Gasparini;Thomas E. Salt;Rainer Kuhn

  • Assessment of neuroprotective effects of glutamate modulation on glaucoma-related retinal ganglion cell apoptosis in vivo.

    Li Guo;Thomas E. Salt;Annelie Maass;Vy Luong

  • Characterization of sensory and corticothalamic excitatory inputs to rat thalamocortical neurones in vitro.

    J. P. Turner;T. E. Salt

  • Human Müller Glia with Stem Cell Characteristics Differentiate into Retinal Ganglion Cell (RGC) Precursors In Vitro and Partially Restore RGC Function In Vivo Following Transplantation

    Shweta Singhal;Bhairavi Bhatia;Hari Jayaram;Silke Becker

  • Neuroprotection in glaucoma – Is there a future role?

    Abeir Baltmr;James Duggan;Shereen Nizari;Thomas E. Salt

  • Effects of excitatory amino acids and their antagonists on membrane and action potentials of cat caudate neurones.

    P L Herrling;R Morris;T E Salt

  • FUNCTIONS OF IONOTROPIC AND METABOTROPIC GLUTAMATE RECEPTORS IN SENSORY TRANSMISSION IN THE MAMMALIAN THALAMUS

    T.E. Salt;S.A. Eaton

  • Phenylglycine derivatives as new pharmacological tools for investigating the role of metabotropic glutamate receptors in the central nervous system

    E. F. Birse;S. A. Eaton;D. E. Jane;P. L. Saint J. Jones

  • The thalamic reticular nucleus in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: role of parvalbumin-expressing neuron networks and oxidative stress.

    Pascal Steullet;Jan-Harry Cabungcal;Syed A. Bukhari;Magdalena I. Ardelt

  • Purines in the eye: recent evidence for the physiological and pathological role of purines in the RPE, retinal neurons, astrocytes, Müller cells, lens, trabecular meshwork, cornea and lacrimal gland.

    Julie Sanderson;Darlene A. Dartt;Vickery Trinkaus-Randall;Jesus Pintor

  • Imaging multiple phases of neurodegeneration: a novel approach to assessing cell death in vivo

    M F Cordeiro;L Guo;K M Coxon;J Duggan

  • Functional alignment of feedback effects from visual cortex to thalamus.

    Wei Wang;Helen E Jones;Ian M Andolina;Thomas E Salt

  • Dependence of retinogeniculate transmission in cat on NMDA receptors.

    A. M. Sillito;P. C. Murphy;T. E. Salt;C. I. Moody

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam M. Sillito
Adam M. Sillito University College London
Stephen E. Moss
Stephen E. Moss University College London
Kim Q. Do
Kim Q. Do University of Lausanne
Glen Jeffery
Glen Jeffery University College London
Fred W. Fitzke
Fred W. Fitzke University College London
Richard W Morris
Richard W Morris University of Bristol
Robin R. Ali
Robin R. Ali King's College London
David E. Jane
David E. Jane University of Bristol
Peter J. Roberts
Peter J. Roberts University of Bristol
Anand Swaroop
Anand Swaroop National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Thomas E. Salt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles