World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
8364
World Ranking
4426
National Ranking
383

Peter J. Roberts publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peter J. Roberts D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter J. Roberts is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research spans primarily the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences, with a significant focus on Education, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Ecology, General Health Professions, and Surgery.

The scientist's recent papers cover a variety of topics and publication venues, demonstrating a multidisciplinary approach. Key publications include:

  • Kinase Mutations and Imatinib Response in Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor, 2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Competing sexual-asexual generic names in Agaricomycotina (Basidiomycota) with recommendations for use, 2021, IMA Fungus
  • The impacts of a global pandemic on the efficacy and stability of contemporary wildlife conservation: South Africa as a case study, 2022, AMBIO
  • Can interprofessional research enhance health care students' understanding and knowledge towards evidence based practice: A cross sectional study, 2022, Nurse Education Today
  • Parents on the Concept of Physical Literacy: What Do They Know, What Do They Do, and What Do They Want?, 2024, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Roberts include:

  • Daniel M. Parker
  • Karen Ousey
  • Caroline Barker
  • Sarah Reel
  • Jane Tobbell

The scientist publishes repeatedly in certain academic venues such as:

  • Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • IMA Fungus
  • AMBIO

The primary topics of Roberts' work reflect a diverse academic interest and include:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Critical and Liberation Pedagogy
  • Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Best Publications

  • Stimulatory effect of L-glutamate and related amino acids on [3H]dopamine release from rat striatum: an in vitro model for glutamate actions.

    P. J. Roberts;Susan D. Anderson

  • High affinity l-[3h]glutamate binding to postsynaptic receptor sites on rat cerebellar membranes.

    A. C. Foster;P. J. Roberts

  • Activation of dopamine receptors inhibits calcium-dependent glutamate release from cotico-striatal terminals in vitro

    Gethin J. Rowlands;Peter J. Roberts

  • Competitive antagonism at metabotropic glutamate receptors by (S) -4-carboxyphenylglycine and (RS) -α-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine

    Sean A. Eaton;David E. Jane;Philip L.St.J. Jones;Richard H.P. Porter

  • Neurotoxicity of L-glutamate and DL-threo-3-hydroxyaspartate in the rat striatum.

    Gethin J. McBean;Peter J. Roberts

  • No evidence for preservation of somatostatin-containing neurons after intrastriatal injections of quinolinic acid.

    Stephen W. Davies;Stephen W. Davies;Peter J. Roberts

  • Phenylglycine derivatives as new pharmacological tools for investigating the role of metabotropic glutamate receptors in the central nervous system

    E. F. Birse;S. A. Eaton;D. E. Jane;P. L. Saint J. Jones

  • PRESYNAPTIC γ‐AMINOBUTYRIC ACID RECEPTORS IN THE RAT ANOCOCCYGEUS MUSCLE AND THEIR ANTAGONISM BY 5‐AMINOVALERIC ACID

    M. Muhyaddin;P.J. Roberts;G.N. Woodruff

  • Identification of Gly-Pro-Glu (GPE), the aminoterminal tripeptide of insulin-like growth factor 1 which is truncated in brain, as a novel neuroactive peptide

    Vicki R. Sara;Christine Carlsson-Skwirut;Christine Carlsson-Skwirut;Tomas Bergman;Tomas Bergman;Hans Jörnvall;Hans Jörnvall

  • Striatal glutamatergic function: Modifications following specific lesions

    Peter J. Roberts;Gethin J. McBean;Najam A. Sharif;Emyr M. Thomas

  • Effects ofl-glutamate and related amino acids upon the release of [3H]dopamine from rat striatal slices

    Peter J. Roberts;Najam A. Sharif

  • Pharmacological tools for the investigation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs): Phenylglycine derivatives and other selective antagonists—an update

    P.J. Roberts

  • The release of amino acids with proposed neurotransmitter function from the cuneate and gracile nuclei of the rat in vivo.

    Peter J. Roberts

  • Structural requirements for the inhibition for L-glutamate uptake by glia and nerve endings

    Unknown

  • Antagonism of presynaptically mediated depressant responses and cyclic AMP-coupled metabotropic glutamate receptors

    Martyn Kemp;Peter Roberts;Peter Pook;David Jane

  • Presynaptic and postsynaptic glutamatergic function in Alzheimer's disease

    Richard Cowburn;John Hardy;Peter Roberts;Roger Briggs

  • Glutamate-preferring receptors regulate the release of D-[3H]aspartate from rat hippocampal slices.

    Gethin J. McBean;P. J. Roberts

  • Regional distribution of pre- and postsynaptic glutamatergic function in Alzheimer's disease.

    Richard Cowburn;John Hardy;Peter Roberts;Roger Briggs

  • The effects of (RS)‐α‐cyclopropyl‐4‐phosphonophenylglycine ((RS)‐CPPG), a potent and selective metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist

    Nicholas J. Toms;David E. Jane;Martyn C. Kemp;Jennifer S. Bedingfield

  • Glutamate receptors in the rat central nervous system

    Unknown

  • Agonist-induced internalization of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1a is arrestin- and dynamin-dependent.

    Stuart J. Mundell;Anne-Lise Matharu;Giordano Pula;Peter J. Roberts

  • The release of amino acids from the hemisected spinal cord during stimulation.

    P. J. Roberts;J. F. Mitchell

  • THE DISTRIBUTION AND AXONAL TRANSPORT OF FREE AMINO ACIDS AND RELATED COMPOUNDS IN THE DORSAL SENSORY NEURON OF THE RAT, AS DETERMINED BY THE DANSYL REACTION

    P. J. Roberts;P. Keen;J. F. Mitchell

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. Jane
David E. Jane University of Bristol
John Hardy
John Hardy University College London
Thomas E. Salt
Thomas E. Salt University College London
Robert Schwarcz
Robert Schwarcz University of Maryland, Baltimore
Robert Nisticò
Robert Nisticò University of Rome Tor Vergata
Kjell Fuxe
Kjell Fuxe Karolinska Institute
Graham L. Collingridge
Graham L. Collingridge Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Zuner A. Bortolotto
Zuner A. Bortolotto University of Bristol
Agata Copani
Agata Copani University of Catania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and career paths. Many students interested in the brain and behavior also consider fields such as social work, psychology, or applied behavioral analysis. Pursuing an online degree can be a flexible and affordable path, especially when balancing education with work or family commitments.

If you are seeking a cost-effective graduate degree, reviewing the most affordable online msw programs can help you enter fields focused on mental health and community support. Those interested in becoming certified to work with individuals with behavioral needs might consider earning bcba certification online for greater flexibility and affordability.

For students looking to fast-track their education, there are also 1 year msw programs and excellent accelerated bachelor's degree psychology options available online. These programs can lead to diverse roles in mental health, behavioral research, therapy, and beyond—empowering you to start your career sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Roberts

Recently Published Articles