World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
10952
World Ranking
6829
National Ranking
530

Adam M. Sillito publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam M. Sillito sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 85 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Adam M. Sillito D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam M. Sillito sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Adam M. Sillito was affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their academic career included research and contributions that have been recognized within the scientific community.

The scientist was a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom. This fellowship is an indication of their involvement and standing within the medical sciences domain.

Information on their specific research papers, co-authors, publication venues, fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work is not available. As a result, no detailed listing of these elements can be provided.

Their status as deceased is noted, and their career and contributions are referenced in past tense accordingly.

Best Publications

  • Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities

    A. M. Sillito;K. L. Grieve;H. E. Jones;J. Cudeiro

  • FEATURE-LINKED SYNCHRONIZATION OF THALAMIC RELAY CELL FIRING INDUCED BY FEEDBACK FROM THE VISUAL-CORTEX

    Adam M. Sillito;Helen E. Jones;George L. Gerstein;David C. West

  • The contribution of inhibitory mechanisms to the receptive field properties of neurones in the striate cortex of the cat.

    Unknown

  • Surround suppression in primate V1

    H. E. Jones;K. L. Grieve;W. Wang;A. M. Sillito

  • Targeting amyloid-β in glaucoma treatment

    Li Guo;Thomas E. Salt;Vy Luong;Nicholas Wood

  • Cholinergic modulation of the functional organization of the cat visual cortex

    Unknown

  • Inhibitory processes underlying the directional specificity of simple, complex and hypercomplex cells in the cat's visual cortex

    Unknown

  • Feedback Connections to the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Cortical Response Properties

    Penelope C. Murphy;Penelope C. Murphy;Simon G. Duckett;Adam M. Sillito

  • Always returning: feedback and sensory processing in visual cortex and thalamus

    Adam M. Sillito;Javier Cudeiro;Helen E. Jones

  • Inhibitory mechanisms influencing complex cell orientation selectivity and their modification at high resting discharge levels.

    Unknown

  • Real-time imaging of single nerve cell apoptosis in retinal neurodegeneration

    M. Francesca Cordeiro;Li Guo;Vy Luong;Glen Harding

  • A re-evaluation of the mechanisms underlying simple cell orientation selectivity

    Adam M. Sillito;John A. Kemp;James A. Milson;Nicoletta Berardi

  • Corticofugal feedback influences the generation of length tuning in the visual pathway

    Unknown

  • Spatial organization and magnitude of orientation contrast interactions in primate V1

    H. E. Jones;W. Wang;A. M. Sillito

  • Corticothalamic interactions in the transfer of visual information.

    Adam M. Sillito;Helen E. Jones

  • Functional Considerations of the Operation of GABAergic Inhibitory Processes in the Visual Cortex

    Unknown

  • The cholinergic influence on the function of the cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN).

    Adam M. Sillito;John A. Kemp;Nicoletta Berardi

  • Orientation sensitive elements in the corticofugal influence on centre-surround interactions in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus.

    A. M. Sillito;J. Cudeiro;P. C. Murphy

  • Functional morphology of the feedback pathway from area 17 of the cat visual cortex to the lateral geniculate nucleus

    Penelope C. Murphy;Adam M. Sillito

  • Looking back: corticothalamic feedback and early visual processing.

    Javier Cudeiro;Adam M. Sillito

  • Cholinergic enhancement of direction selectivity in the visual cortex of the cat.

    P.C. Murphy;A.M. Sillito

  • Corticothalamic feedback enhances stimulus response precision in the visual system.

    Ian M. Andolina;Helen E. Jones;Wei Wang;Adam M. Sillito

  • Imaging multiple phases of neurodegeneration: a novel approach to assessing cell death in vivo

    M F Cordeiro;L Guo;K M Coxon;J Duggan

  • Functional alignment of feedback effects from visual cortex to thalamus.

    Wei Wang;Helen E Jones;Ian M Andolina;Thomas E Salt

  • Dependence of retinogeniculate transmission in cat on NMDA receptors.

    A. M. Sillito;P. C. Murphy;T. E. Salt;C. I. Moody

  • Spatial summation in lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex.

    Helen E. Jones;Ian M. Andolina;Nicola M. Oakely;Penelope C. Murphy;Penelope C. Murphy

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas E. Salt
Thomas E. Salt University College London
Stephen E. Moss
Stephen E. Moss University College London
Fred W. Fitzke
Fred W. Fitzke University College London
George L. Gerstein
George L. Gerstein University of Pennsylvania
José-Alain Sahel
José-Alain Sahel University of Pittsburgh
Michael E. Cheetham
Michael E. Cheetham University College London
Nicholas W. Wood
Nicholas W. Wood University College London
John Greenwood
John Greenwood University College London
Colin Blakemore
Colin Blakemore City University of Hong Kong
Gary S. Rubin
Gary S. Rubin University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens up diverse academic and professional opportunities, especially for students seeking flexibility through online education. Many learners start with an online bachelor's degree, providing a strong foundation in science while adapting to busy schedules or work commitments. Choosing wisely can also impact long-term prospects—consider the best bachelor degrees to get for maximum career growth and earning potential.

Advancing beyond an undergraduate degree, students might explore specialized fields such as marriage and family therapy. Accredited programs like the mft accredited programs provide accelerated pathways to licensure and practice in mental health support. For those dedicated to clinical psychology, flexible psyd online programs make advanced doctoral study more accessible, preparing graduates for specialized roles in therapy, assessment, and research.

Ultimately, the expanding array of online degrees and career pathways allows neuroscience students to tailor their education to their career ambitions, whether in healthcare, research, or allied professions.

Best Scientists Citing Adam M. Sillito