World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
8561
World Ranking
8136
National Ranking
4365

Katie M. Edwards publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katie M. Edwards sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 232 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Katie M. Edwards D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katie M. Edwards sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Katie M. Edwards is affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States. Their research centers primarily on social sciences and psychology, with significant emphasis on health, gender studies, sociology and political science, general health professions, and clinical psychology subfields.

Their scholarly output includes work in a variety of interrelated topics such as intimate partner and family violence, sexual assault and victimization studies, sex work and related issues, child abuse and trauma, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, LGBTQ health, identity, and policy, as well as sexuality, behavior, and technology.

Recent publications by Katie M. Edwards include:

  • Disclosure of Sexual Assault Among Sexual and Gender Minorities: A Systematic Literature Review, 2022, Trauma Violence & Abuse
  • A Pilot Evaluation of an Intervention to Improve Social Reactions to Sexual and Partner Violence Disclosures, 2020, Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Evaluating the Impact of a Youth-Led Sexual Violence Prevention Program: Youth Leadership Retreat Outcomes, 2022, Prevention Science
  • Victimization Typologies Among a Large National Sample of Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents, 2021, LGBT Health
  • Community actionists: Understanding adult bystanders to sexual and domestic violence prevention in communities, 2020, Psychology of Violence

Katie M. Edwards frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Emily A. Waterman
  • Victoria L. Banyard
  • Laura Siller
  • Lorey A. Wheeler
  • Skyler Hopfauf

Their research is published predominantly in these venues:

  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Violence Against Women
  • Psychology of Violence
  • Journal of Community Psychology
  • Journal of Family Violence

Best Publications

  • Rape Myths: History, Individual and Institutional-Level Presence, and Implications for Change

    Katie M. Edwards;Jessica A. Turchik;Jessica A. Turchik;Christina M. Dardis;Nicole Reynolds

  • Disclosure of Intimate Partner Violence to Informal Social Support Network Members: A Review of the Literature

    Kateryna M. Sylaska;Katie M. Edwards

  • Intimate Partner Violence Among Sexual Minority Populations: A Critical Review of the Literature and Agenda for Future Research

    Katie M. Edwards;Kateryna M. Sylaska;Angela M. Neal

  • Myths about male rape: A literature review.

    Jessica A. Turchik;Katie M. Edwards

  • Physical Dating Violence, Sexual Violence, and Unwanted Pursuit Victimization A Comparison of Incidence Rates Among Sexual-Minority and Heterosexual College Students

    Katie M. Edwards;Kateryna M. Sylaska;Johanna E. Barry;Mary M. Moynihan

  • The Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence among LGBTQ College Youth: The Role of Minority Stress

    Katie M. Edwards;Kateryna M. Sylaska

  • An examination of the factors related to dating violence perpetration among young men and women and associated theoretical explanations: a review of the literature.

    Christina M. Dardis;Kristiana J. Dixon;Katie M. Edwards;Jessica A. Turchik

  • Intimate Partner Violence and the Rural–Urban–Suburban Divide: Myth or Reality? A Critical Review of the Literature

    Katie M. Edwards

  • Women's risk perception and sexual victimization: A review of the literature

    Christine A. Gidycz;John R. McNamara;Katie M. Edwards

  • The Benefits of Dispositional Mindfulness in Physical Health: A Longitudinal Study of Female College Students

    Megan J. Murphy;Liza C. Mermelstein;Katie M. Edwards;Christine A. Gidycz

  • Integrating Sexual Assault Resistance, Bystander, and Men's Social Norms Strategies to Prevent Sexual Violence on College Campuses: A Call to Action.

    Lindsay M. Orchowski;Katie M. Edwards;Jocelyn A. Hollander;Victoria L. Banyard

  • Academic correlates of unwanted sexual contact, intercourse, stalking and intimate partner violence: An understudied but important consequence for college students

    Victoria L. Banyard;Jennifer M. Demers;Ellen S. Cohn;Katie M. Edwards

  • Community matters: Intimate partner violence among rural young adults

    Katie M. Edwards;Marybeth J. Mattingly;Kristiana J. Dixon;Victoria L. Banyard

  • Women’s disclosure of dating violence: A mixed methodological study

    Katie M Edwards;Christina M Dardis;Christine A Gidycz

  • Prediction of Women's Utilization of Resistance Strategies in a Sexual Assault Situation A Prospective Study

    Christine A. Gidycz;Amy Van Wynsberghe;Katie M. Edwards

  • COLLEGE WOMEN'S REACTIONS TO SEXUAL ASSAULT RESEARCH PARTICIPATION: IS IT DISTRESSING?

    Katie M. Edwards;Megan C. Kearns;Karen S. Calhoun;Christine A. Gidycz

  • The Impact of the Bystander’s Relationship With the Victim and the Perpetrator on Intent to Help in Situations Involving Sexual Violence

    Sidney Bennett;Victoria L. Banyard;Katie M. Edwards

  • Perpetrators’ and Victims’ Attributions for IPV A Critical Review of the Literature

    Angela M. Neal;Katie M. Edwards

  • Concurrent Administration of Sexual Assault Prevention and Risk Reduction Programming: Outcomes for Women

    Christine A Gidycz;Lindsay M Orchowski;Danielle R Probst;Katie Edwards

  • College Women’s Stay/Leave Decisions in Abusive Dating Relationships: A Prospective Analysis of an Expanded Investment Model

    Katie M. Edwards;Christine A. Gidycz;Megan J. Murphy

Frequent Co-Authors

Victoria L. Banyard
Victoria L. Banyard Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Christine A. Gidycz
Christine A. Gidycz Ohio University
Sarah E. Ullman
Sarah E. Ullman University of Illinois at Chicago
Kimberly J. Mitchell
Kimberly J. Mitchell University of New Hampshire
Mary M. Moynihan
Mary M. Moynihan University of New Hampshire
Heather L. Littleton
Heather L. Littleton University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Karen S. Calhoun
Karen S. Calhoun University of Georgia
Lindsay M. Orchowski
Lindsay M. Orchowski Brown University
Lisa M. Jones
Lisa M. Jones University of New Hampshire
Ryan J. Watson
Ryan J. Watson University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of professional opportunities. Some students are drawn to the flexible career options provided by this field, from clinical work to research and beyond. It’s important to weigh the pros and cons of clinical psychology, such as the need for advanced training, potential stress, and the rewarding nature of helping others.

There are many careers in psychology that students can explore, including roles in counseling, research, education, and industry. Another growing pathway is in psychometrics, where professionals analyze and interpret psychological tests. The psychometrist salary can vary by experience and setting, but this role is in demand in healthcare and educational environments.

When considering graduate study, it’s crucial to understand the difference between phd in psychology and psyd. Each path prepares you for different career outcomes, with the PhD generally emphasizing research and the PsyD focused on clinical practice. Choosing the right degree is an important step toward building a fulfilling career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Katie M. Edwards

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles