World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
9543
World Ranking
4239
National Ranking
366

Johannes Noth publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Noth sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 170 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Johannes Noth D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Noth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johannes Noth is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields, including Neuroscience, Medicine, and Arts and Humanities. Within these broad disciplines, their work further delves into subfields such as Neurology, Surgery, and History.

Their scholarly output includes research on topics that reflect a focus on the intersection of medical sciences and historical inquiry. These main topics of work are:

  • Neurology and Historical Studies
  • Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Medical History and Research

One of their recent publications is titled Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurologie, published in 2022 in the journal DGNeurologie. This article contributes to the medical and neurological academic discourse.

Johannes Noth collaborates frequently with several researchers across their projects. Their common co-authors include:

  • Christian Gerloff
  • David Friedrich-Schmidt
  • Wolfgang Wick
  • Philip Benjamin

Their work is primarily published in venues such as DGNeurologie, reflecting a focus on neurology and related medical sciences.

Best Publications

  • Recovery from Wernicke's aphasia: a positron emission tomographic study.

    Cornelius Weiller;Christian Isensee;Michel Rijntjes;Walter Huber

  • Precision grip and Parkinson's disease

    S J Fellows;J Noth;M Schwarz

  • DJ-1 (PARK7) mutations are less frequent than Parkin (PARK2) mutations in early-onset Parkinson disease.

    K. Hedrich;A. Djarmati;N. Schäfer;R. Hering

  • Frequency of deep vein thrombosis in patients with patent foramen ovale and ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack

    Harald Lethen;Frank A. Flachskampf;Rolf Schneider;Ulrich Sliwka

  • Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects.

    Raffaella Ida Rumiati;Peter H. Weiss;Tim Shallice;Giovanni Ottoboni

  • Gradual loss of myelin and formation of an astrocytic scar during Wallerian degeneration in the human spinal cord

    A. Buss;G. A. Brook;B. Kakulas;Didier Martin

  • Pathophysiology of chorea and bradykinesia in Huntington's disease

    Alfredo Berardelli;Johannes Noth;Philip D. Thompson;Eduard L. E. M. Bollen

  • Facilitation of picture naming by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of Wernicke's area

    R. Töpper;F. M. Mottaghy;M. Brügmann;J. Noth

  • Prevalence and Time Course of Microembolic Signals in Patients With Acute Stroke: A Prospective Study

    Ulrich Sliwka;Ariane Lingnau;Wolf-Dirk Stohlmann;Peter Schmidt

  • Spontaneous longitudinally orientated axonal regeneration is associated with the Schwann cell framework within the lesion site following spinal cord compression injury of the rat.

    G. A. Brook;D. Plate;Rachelle Franzen;Didier Martin

  • Occurrence of Transcranial Doppler High-Intensity Transient Signals in Patients With Potential Cardiac Sources of Embolism A Prospective Study

    Ulrich Sliwka;Frank-Peter Job;Dorothee Wissuwa;Rolf R. Diehl

  • Transthoracic echocardiography using second harmonic imaging: diagnostic alternative to transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of atrial right to left shunt in patients with cerebral embolic events.

    Harald P Kühl;Rainer Hoffmann;Marc W Merx;Andreas Franke

  • Left inferior parietal cortex integrates time and space during collision judgments.

    Ann Assmus;John C Marshall;John C Marshall;Afra Ritzl;Johannes Noth

  • Language functions in Huntington's disease.

    Klaus Podoll;Peter Caspary;Herwig W. Lange;Johannes Noth

  • Sequential loss of myelin proteins during Wallerian degeneration in the human spinal cord.

    A. Buss;K. Pech;D. Merkler;B. A. Kakulas

  • An increased frequency of patent foramen ovale in patients with transient global amnesia : Analysis of 53 consecutive patients

    Christof Klötzsch;Ulrich Sliwka;Peter Berlit;Johannes Noth

  • Medium and long latency EMG responses in leg muscles: Parkinson's disease.

    E Scholz;H C Diener;J Noth;H Friedemann

  • Long-loop reflexes in small hand muscles studied in normal subjects and in patients with Huntington's disease.

    Unknown

  • Balance and motor speech impairment in essential tremor.

    Martin Kronenbuerger;Juergen Konczak;Wolfram Ziegler;Paul Buderath

  • Precision grip deficits in cerebellar disorders in man.

    S.J Fellows;J Ernst;M Schwarz;R Töpper

  • Cytocompatibility of a novel, longitudinally microstructured collagen scaffold intended for nerve tissue repair.

    Sven Möllers;Ingo Heschel;Leon H H Olde Damink;Frank Schügner

  • NG2 and phosphacan are present in the astroglial scar after human traumatic spinal cord injury

    Armin Buss;Katrin Pech;Byron A Kakulas;Didier Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Schoenen
Jean Schoenen University of Liège
Georg W. Kreutzberg
Georg W. Kreutzberg Max Planck Society
Rudolf Töpper
Rudolf Töpper RWTH Aachen University
Peter H. Weiss
Peter H. Weiss Forschungszentrum Jülich
Roland Sparing
Roland Sparing University of Cologne
Peter Hanrath
Peter Hanrath RWTH Aachen University
Gereon R. Fink
Gereon R. Fink University of Cologne
Timo Krings
Timo Krings University Health Network
Karl Zilles
Karl Zilles Forschungszentrum Jülich
John C. Marshall
John C. Marshall University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Johannes Noth

Trending Scientists