World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
30688
World Ranking
11743
National Ranking
638

Peter Hanrath publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Hanrath sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 653 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Hanrath D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Hanrath sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Hanrath is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a specialization in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Hanrath has contributed to academic literature with a documented publication in 2021 titled Prognostic markers of all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation: data from the prospective long-term registry of the German Atrial Fibrillation NETwork (AFNET), published in the journal EP Europace. This paper has been cited 28 times.

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Hanrath include:

  • Michael Näbauer
  • M. Oeff
  • Andrea Gerth
  • Karl Wegscheider
  • Anika Buchholz

Their publications have appeared predominantly in the venue EP Europace, aligning with their research focus on cardiac electrophysiology and atrial fibrillation.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET): randomised controlled trial

    Philip A. Poole-Wilson;Karl Swedberg;John G.F. Cleland;Andrea Di Lenarda

  • Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. A multicenter survey of 10,419 examinations.

    W G Daniel;R Erbel;W Kasper;C A Visser

  • Prognostic relevance of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic heart failure on long-term treatment with beta-blockers: results from COMET

    Karl Swedberg;Lars G. Olsson;Andrew Charlesworth;John Cleland

  • Critical issues in peripheral arterial disease detection and management: a call to action.

    Jill J. F. Belch;Eric J. Topol;Giancarlo Agnelli;Michel Bertrand

  • Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms

    Rainer Hoffmann;Harald Lethen;Thomas Marwick;Mariarosaria Arnese

  • Left ventricular relaxation and filling pattern in different forms of left ventricular hypertrophy: an echocardiographic study.

    Peter Hanrath;Detlef G. Mathey;Ralf Siegert;Walter Bleifeld

  • Deposition of Platelet RANTES Triggering Monocyte Recruitment Requires P-Selectin and Is Involved in Neointima Formation After Arterial Injury

    Andreas Schober;David Manka;Philipp von Hundelshausen;Yuqing Huo

  • High-resolution transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: quantitation of cardiac volumes and function using semi-automatic border detection and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

    Harald P Kühl;Marcus Schreckenberg;Dierk Rulands;Markus Katoh

  • HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor Simvastatin Profoundly Improves Survival in a Murine Model of Sepsis

    Marc W. Merx;Elisa A. Liehn;Uwe Janssens;Rudolf Lütticken

  • Functional, angiographic and intracoronary doppler flow characteristics in symptomatic patients with myocardial bridging: Effect of short-term intravenous beta-blocker medication

    Ernst R. Schwarz;Heinrich G. Klues;Jürgen vom Dahl;Ilona Klein

  • The Safety of Intracoronary Ultrasound A Multicenter Survey of 2207 Examinations

    Dirk Hausmann;Raimund Erbel;Marie-J. Alibelli-Chemarin;Wolfgang Boksch

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy can reverse abnormal myocardial strain distribution in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.

    Ole A Breithardt;Christoph Stellbrink;Lieven Herbots;Piet Claus

  • Assessment of Myocardial Reperfusion by Intravenous Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography and Coronary Flow Reserve After Primary Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angiography in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Wolfgang Lepper;Rainer Hoffmann;Otto Kamp;Andreas Franke

  • Statin treatment after onset of sepsis in a murine model improves survival

    Marc W. Merx;Elisa A. Liehn;Jürgen Graf;Annette van de Sandt

  • Analysis of myocardial deformation based on pixel tracking in two dimensional echocardiographic images enables quantitative assessment of regional left ventricular function

    Michael Becker;Eva Bilke;Harald Kühl;Markus Katoh

  • Comparison of transcranial contrast Doppler sonography and transesophageal contrast echocardiography for the detection of patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients.

    Job Fp;Ringelstein Eb;Grafen Y;Flachskampf Fa

  • Strain rate measurement by doppler echocardiography allows improvedassessment of myocardial viability inpatients with depressed left ventricular function

    Rainer Hoffmann;Ertunc Altiok;Nicole Heussen;Peter Hanrath

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves central sleep apnea and Cheyne-Stokes respiration in patients with chronic heart failure

    Anil-Martin Sinha;Erik C Skobel;Ole-Alexander Breithardt;Christine Norra

  • Improved morphologic characterization of atrial septal aneurysm by transesophageal echocardiography: relation to cerebrovascular events.

    Birke Schneider;Peter Hanrath;Peter Vogel;Thomas Meinertz

  • Critical Issues in Peripheral Arterial Disease Detection and Management

    Jill J. F. Belch;Eric J. Topol;Giancarlo Agnelli;Michel Bertrand

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Weber
Christian Weber Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Christian Torp-Pedersen
Christian Torp-Pedersen Aalborg University
John G.F. Cleland
John G.F. Cleland University of Glasgow
Marco Metra
Marco Metra University of Brescia
Philip A. Poole-Wilson
Philip A. Poole-Wilson National Institutes of Health
Raimund Erbel
Raimund Erbel University of Duisburg-Essen
Anja-Katrin Bosserhoff
Anja-Katrin Bosserhoff University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Karl Swedberg
Karl Swedberg University of Gothenburg
Thomas H. Marwick
Thomas H. Marwick Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Rolf W. Günther
Rolf W. Günther Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens up a wide array of related online degrees and career paths. For those interested in nutrition and preventive care, pursuing a nutritionist online degree offers flexibility and a science-driven curriculum to prepare graduates for diverse roles in health and wellness.

The healthcare sector also demands skilled leaders. A cahme accredited MHA program ensures your online master’s in healthcare administration meets important industry standards, advancing your ability to manage teams and healthcare facilities.

For registered nurses seeking career growth, an rn to bsn online with no clinicals program streamlines the journey to higher qualifications, making it easier for working professionals to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Nurses ready for advanced practice may consider the fastest dnp program, allowing them to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice through accelerated online study, optimizing both time and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Hanrath

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles