World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11742 11046 639 615 653 30688

Peter Hanrath publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Hanrath between 1972 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Hanrath published across 50 years, from 1972 to 2021, averaging 13.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2004. 1 of the 659 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2004. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 7 publications 1974: 12 publications 1975: 8 publications 1976: 5 publications 1977: 13 publications 1978: 10 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 8 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 19 publications 1983: 13 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 18 publications 1992: 14 publications 1993: 16 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 32 publications 1996: 35 publications 1997: 32 publications 1998: 31 publications 1999: 30 publications 2000: 34 publications 2001: 42 publications 2002: 46 publications 2003: 41 publications 2004: 50 publications 2005: 31 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 29 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1972 2021

659 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Hanrath: publications per year, 1972 to 2021
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 7
1974 12
1975 8
1976 5
1977 13
1978 10
1979 4
1980 8
1981 6
1982 19
1983 13
1984 5
1985 2
1986 2
1987 1
1988 1
1989 4
1990 13
1991 18
1992 14
1993 16
1994 17
1995 32
1996 35
1997 32
1998 31
1999 30
2000 34
2001 42
2002 46
2003 41
2004 50
2005 31
2006 11
2007 13
2008 29
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 659
Download as CSV

Peter Hanrath publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Hanrath sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 641–660 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 653 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371 653
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Hanrath D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Hanrath sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Hanrath is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a specialization in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Hanrath has contributed to academic literature with a documented publication in 2021 titled Prognostic markers of all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation: data from the prospective long-term registry of the German Atrial Fibrillation NETwork (AFNET), published in the journal EP Europace. This paper has been cited 28 times.

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Hanrath include:

  • Michael Näbauer
  • M. Oeff
  • Andrea Gerth
  • Karl Wegscheider
  • Anika Buchholz

Their publications have appeared predominantly in the venue EP Europace, aligning with their research focus on cardiac electrophysiology and atrial fibrillation.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET): randomised controlled trial

    Philip A. Poole-Wilson;Karl Swedberg;John G.F. Cleland;Andrea Di Lenarda

  • Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. A multicenter survey of 10,419 examinations.

    W G Daniel;R Erbel;W Kasper;C A Visser

  • Prognostic relevance of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic heart failure on long-term treatment with beta-blockers: results from COMET

    Karl Swedberg;Lars G. Olsson;Andrew Charlesworth;John Cleland

  • Critical issues in peripheral arterial disease detection and management: a call to action.

    Jill J. F. Belch;Eric J. Topol;Giancarlo Agnelli;Michel Bertrand

  • Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms

    Rainer Hoffmann;Harald Lethen;Thomas Marwick;Mariarosaria Arnese

  • Left ventricular relaxation and filling pattern in different forms of left ventricular hypertrophy: an echocardiographic study.

    Peter Hanrath;Detlef G. Mathey;Ralf Siegert;Walter Bleifeld

  • Deposition of Platelet RANTES Triggering Monocyte Recruitment Requires P-Selectin and Is Involved in Neointima Formation After Arterial Injury

    Andreas Schober;David Manka;Philipp von Hundelshausen;Yuqing Huo

  • High-resolution transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: quantitation of cardiac volumes and function using semi-automatic border detection and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

    Harald P Kühl;Marcus Schreckenberg;Dierk Rulands;Markus Katoh

  • HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor Simvastatin Profoundly Improves Survival in a Murine Model of Sepsis

    Marc W. Merx;Elisa A. Liehn;Uwe Janssens;Rudolf Lütticken

  • Functional, angiographic and intracoronary doppler flow characteristics in symptomatic patients with myocardial bridging: Effect of short-term intravenous beta-blocker medication

    Ernst R. Schwarz;Heinrich G. Klues;Jürgen vom Dahl;Ilona Klein

  • The Safety of Intracoronary Ultrasound A Multicenter Survey of 2207 Examinations

    Dirk Hausmann;Raimund Erbel;Marie-J. Alibelli-Chemarin;Wolfgang Boksch

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy can reverse abnormal myocardial strain distribution in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.

    Ole A Breithardt;Christoph Stellbrink;Lieven Herbots;Piet Claus

  • Assessment of Myocardial Reperfusion by Intravenous Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography and Coronary Flow Reserve After Primary Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angiography in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Wolfgang Lepper;Rainer Hoffmann;Otto Kamp;Andreas Franke

  • Statin treatment after onset of sepsis in a murine model improves survival

    Marc W. Merx;Elisa A. Liehn;Jürgen Graf;Annette van de Sandt

  • Analysis of myocardial deformation based on pixel tracking in two dimensional echocardiographic images enables quantitative assessment of regional left ventricular function

    Michael Becker;Eva Bilke;Harald Kühl;Markus Katoh

  • Comparison of transcranial contrast Doppler sonography and transesophageal contrast echocardiography for the detection of patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients.

    Job Fp;Ringelstein Eb;Grafen Y;Flachskampf Fa

  • Strain rate measurement by doppler echocardiography allows improvedassessment of myocardial viability inpatients with depressed left ventricular function

    Rainer Hoffmann;Ertunc Altiok;Nicole Heussen;Peter Hanrath

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves central sleep apnea and Cheyne-Stokes respiration in patients with chronic heart failure

    Anil-Martin Sinha;Erik C Skobel;Ole-Alexander Breithardt;Christine Norra

  • Improved morphologic characterization of atrial septal aneurysm by transesophageal echocardiography: relation to cerebrovascular events.

    Birke Schneider;Peter Hanrath;Peter Vogel;Thomas Meinertz

  • Critical Issues in Peripheral Arterial Disease Detection and Management

    Jill J. F. Belch;Eric J. Topol;Giancarlo Agnelli;Michel Bertrand

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Weber
Christian Weber Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Christian Torp-Pedersen
Christian Torp-Pedersen Aalborg University
John G.F. Cleland
John G.F. Cleland University of Glasgow
Marco Metra
Marco Metra University of Brescia
Philip A. Poole-Wilson
Philip A. Poole-Wilson National Institutes of Health
Raimund Erbel
Raimund Erbel University of Duisburg-Essen
Anja-Katrin Bosserhoff
Anja-Katrin Bosserhoff University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Karl Swedberg
Karl Swedberg University of Gothenburg
Thomas H. Marwick
Thomas H. Marwick Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Rolf W. Günther
Rolf W. Günther Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens up a wide array of related online degrees and career paths. For those interested in nutrition and preventive care, pursuing a nutritionist online degree offers flexibility and a science-driven curriculum to prepare graduates for diverse roles in health and wellness.

The healthcare sector also demands skilled leaders. A cahme accredited MHA program ensures your online master’s in healthcare administration meets important industry standards, advancing your ability to manage teams and healthcare facilities.

For registered nurses seeking career growth, an rn to bsn online with no clinicals program streamlines the journey to higher qualifications, making it easier for working professionals to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Nurses ready for advanced practice may consider the fastest dnp program, allowing them to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice through accelerated online study, optimizing both time and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Hanrath

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles