World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Germany
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 164 647 592 27 26 1988 124511

Raimund Erbel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Raimund Erbel between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Raimund Erbel published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 41 papers a year. Output peaked at 129 publications in 2009. 14 of the 2,051 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 129. Peak 129 publications in 2009. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 7 publications 1980: 7 publications 1981: 12 publications 1982: 9 publications 1983: 12 publications 1984: 9 publications 1985: 23 publications 1986: 22 publications 1987: 31 publications 1988: 18 publications 1989: 35 publications 1990: 18 publications 1991: 48 publications 1992: 24 publications 1993: 23 publications 1994: 29 publications 1995: 41 publications 1996: 39 publications 1997: 39 publications 1998: 54 publications 1999: 50 publications 2000: 41 publications 2001: 52 publications 2002: 61 publications 2003: 57 publications 2004: 55 publications 2005: 74 publications 2006: 85 publications 2007: 82 publications 2008: 109 publications 2009: 129 publications 2010: 79 publications 2011: 76 publications 2012: 93 publications 2013: 101 publications 2014: 93 publications 2015: 93 publications 2016: 51 publications 2017: 37 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 3 publications
1976 2025

2,051 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Raimund Erbel: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 2
1978 3
1979 7
1980 7
1981 12
1982 9
1983 12
1984 9
1985 23
1986 22
1987 31
1988 18
1989 35
1990 18
1991 48
1992 24
1993 23
1994 29
1995 41
1996 39
1997 39
1998 54
1999 50
2000 41
2001 52
2002 61
2003 57
2004 55
2005 74
2006 85
2007 82
2008 109
2009 129
2010 79
2011 76
2012 93
2013 101
2014 93
2015 93
2016 51
2017 37
2018 25
2019 30
2020 26
2021 23
2022 5
2023 4
2024 11
2025 3
Total 2,051
Download as CSV

Raimund Erbel publications per year - data summary

  • Raimund Erbel, a Medicine scholar from University of Duisburg-Essen, has 2,051 publications recorded across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1976 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 129 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1976, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 41.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 41.0 per year counting only the 50 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 46 publications, 2% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1976-1992: 281 publications (16.5 per year); 1993-2009: 1,020 publications (60.0 per year); 2010-2025: 750 publications (46.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Raimund Erbel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raimund Erbel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,796+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,988 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100 1,988
Download as CSV

Raimund Erbel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Raimund Erbel, a Medicine scholar from University of Duisburg-Essen, records 1,988 publications - the 100th percentile of the discipline.
  • 100% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Raimund Erbel, and about 0% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Raimund Erbel ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Raimund Erbel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raimund Erbel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 164–165 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 164 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53 164
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Raimund Erbel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Raimund Erbel, a Medicine scholar from University of Duisburg-Essen, records 164 D-Index - the 97th percentile of the discipline.
  • 97% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Raimund Erbel, and about 3% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Raimund Erbel ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Raimund Erbel is affiliated with the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany, with a primary research focus in the field of Medicine. Their work prominently centers on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, supported by contributions to related subfields such as Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology, Genetics, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's research topics cover multiple critical areas including:

  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Recent key publications span from 2020 to 2023, featuring studies on cardiovascular health and environmental impacts on disease incidence. Notable papers include:

  • "Associations Between Systolic Interarm Differences in Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes and Mortality," 2020, Hypertension
  • "Long-term exposure to ambient source-specific particulate matter and its components and incidence of cardiovascular events - The Heinz Nixdorf Recall study," 2020, Environment International
  • "Association between lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels and Lp(a) genetic variants with coronary artery calcification," 2020, BMC Medical Genetics
  • "Improving 10-year cardiovascular risk prediction in apparently healthy people: flexible addition of risk modifiers on top of SCORE2," 2023, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
  • "Air Pollution and Progression of Atherosclerosis in Different Vessel Beds-Results from a Prospective Cohort Study in the Ruhr Area, Germany," 2020, Environmental Health Perspectives

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, with several recurring co-authors in their publications including:

  • Karl-Heinz Jöckel
  • Börge Schmidt
  • Andreas Stang
  • Sara Schramm
  • Susanne Moebus

Raimund Erbel's research has been published in a variety of scientific journals. The most common venues are:

  • Scientific Reports (9 publications)
  • PLoS ONE (4 publications)
  • Hypertension (2 publications)
  • European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (2 publications)
  • Der Kardiologe (2 publications)

The body of work reflects a sustained engagement with cardiovascular medicine, integrating epidemiological studies, genetic factors, and environmental influences in relation to cardiovascular disease and associated metabolic conditions.

Best Publications

  • 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

    Erbel R;Aboyans;Boileau C;Bossone E

  • Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants

    Bin Zhou;Rodrigo M Carrillo-Larco;Goodarz Danaei;Leanne M Riley

  • American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

    Gary S Mintz;Steven E Nissen;William D Anderson;Steven R Bailey

  • Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ASTEROID trial.

    Steven E. Nissen;Stephen J. Nicholls;Ilke Sipahi;Peter Libby

  • Clinical Features and Outcomes of Takotsubo (Stress) Cardiomyopathy

    Christian Templin;Jelena R. Ghadri;Johanna Diekmann;L. Christian Napp

  • Defining the role of common variation in the genomic and biological architecture of adult human height

    Andrew R. Wood;Tonu Esko;Jian Yang;Sailaja Vedantam

  • Large-scale association analysis provides insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes

    Andrew P Morris;Benjamin F Voight;Benjamin F Voight;Tanya M Teslovich;Teresa Ferreira

  • Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection

    R. Erbel;F. Alfonso;C. Boileau;O. Dirsch

  • Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology

    Adam E. Locke;Bratati Kahali;Sonja I. Berndt;Anne E. Justice

  • Use of transesophageal echocardiography to guide cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation.

    Allan L. Klein;Richard A. Grimm;R. Daniel Murray;Carolyn Apperson-Hansen

  • Association of a human G-protein β3 subunit variant with hypertension

    W Siffert;D Rosskopf;G Siffert;S Busch

  • Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. A multicenter survey of 10,419 examinations.

    W G Daniel;R Erbel;W Kasper;C A Visser

  • Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial

    Raimund Erbel;Carlo Di Mario;Jozef Bartunek;Johann Bonnier

  • RANDOMISED TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS RECOMBINANT TISSUE-TYPE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR VERSUS INTRAVENOUS STREPTOKINASE IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: Report from the European Cooperative Study Group for Recombinant Tissue-type Plasminogen Activator

    M. Verstraete;M. Bory;D. Collen;R. Erbel

  • Genetic associations with valvular calcification and aortic stenosis.

    George Thanassoulis;George Thanassoulis;Catherine Y. Campbell;David S. Owens;J. Gustav Smith;J. Gustav Smith

  • Expert consensus document on the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease using endovascular stent-grafts.

    Lars G. Svensson;Nicholas T. Kouchoukos;D. Craig Miller;Joseph E. Bavaria

  • Genome-wide trans-ancestry meta-analysis provides insight into the genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes susceptibility.

    Anubha Mahajan;Min Jin Go;Weihua Zhang;Jennifer E. Below

  • Effect of Very High-Intensity Statin Therapy on Regression of Coronary Atherosclerosis

    Steven E. Nissen;Stephen J. Nicholls;Ilke Sipahi;Peter Libby

  • ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Artery Diseases

    Michel Tendera;Victor Aboyans;Marie-Louise Bartelink;Iris Baumgartner

  • Genome-wide trans-ancestry meta-analysis provides insight into the genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes susceptibility

    Anubha Mahajan;Min Jin Go;Weihua Zhang;Jennifer E. Below

Frequent Co-Authors

Susanne Moebus
Susanne Moebus University of Duisburg-Essen
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Karl-Heinz Jöckel University of Duisburg-Essen
Michael Haude
Michael Haude Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Gerd Heusch
Gerd Heusch University of Duisburg-Essen
Johannes Siegrist
Johannes Siegrist Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Barbara Hoffmann
Barbara Hoffmann Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Junbo Ge
Junbo Ge Fudan University
Mika Kivimäki
Mika Kivimäki University College London
Thomas Budde
Thomas Budde University of Münster
Annette Peters
Annette Peters Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of healthcare education in the USA offers a diverse range of online degrees and career pathways for aspiring medical professionals. For registered nurses aiming to advance their careers without compromising on flexibility, exploring the average cost of rn to bsn programs can help you find affordable options tailored to your needs.

Individuals from non-nursing backgrounds can also fast-track their entry into advanced nursing roles by considering direct msn programs online. These programs are designed to streamline the process of becoming a Master’s-prepared nurse, making healthcare careers accessible to more students.

If you’re just starting out, researching direct admit nursing programs can simplify your admissions process by allowing you to secure a spot in nursing school immediately after high school.

For those interested in healthcare but not direct patient care, accredited online programs in medical billing and coding present strong options. Discover reputable medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid to begin your journey toward a rewarding administrative role in the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Raimund Erbel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles