World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
70
Citations
27513
World Ranking
20051
National Ranking
1041

Michael Haude publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Haude sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 431 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael Haude D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Haude sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Haude is affiliated with the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with substantial contributions to Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The main topics of Michael Haude's work include:

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair

Michael Haude has published extensively in several notable venues. The most frequent publication platforms are:

  • EuroIntervention
  • Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • European Heart Journal

Frequent co-authors of Michael Haude include:

  • Adrian Włodarczak
  • Jan Torzewski
  • Johan Bennett
  • Ron Waksman
  • Javier Escaned

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Michael Haude are:

  • Safety and performance of the second-generation drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold (DREAMS 2G) in patients with de novo coronary lesions: three-year clinical results and angiographic findings of the BIOSOLVE-II first-in-man trial (2020, EuroIntervention)
  • Safety and performance of the third-generation drug-eluting resorbable coronary magnesium scaffold system in the treatment of subjects with de novo coronary artery lesions: 6-month results of the prospective, multicenter BIOMAG-I first-in-human study (2023, EClinicalMedicine)
  • A new resorbable magnesium scaffold for de novo coronary lesions (DREAMS 3): one-year results of the BIOMAG-I first-in-human study (2023, EuroIntervention)
  • Mapping interventional cardiology in Europe: the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) Atlas Project (2020, European Heart Journal)
  • BIOSOLVE-IV-registry: Safety and performance of the Magmaris scaffold: 12-month outcomes of the first cohort of 1,075 patients (2020, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions)

Best Publications

  • Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention : A Consensus Document From the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk

    Philip Urban;Roxana Mehran;Roisin Colleran;Dominick J. Angiolillo

  • Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial

    Raimund Erbel;Carlo Di Mario;Jozef Bartunek;Johann Bonnier

  • Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II)

    Patrick W. Serruys;Ben Van Hout;Hans Bonnier;Victor Legrand

  • Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months vs aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial

    Pascal Vranckx;Marco Valgimigli;Peter Jüni;Christian Hamm

  • A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial

    Patrick W Serruys;Bernard Chevalier;Dariusz Dudek;Angel Cequier

  • Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial

    Patrick W Serruys;Bernard Chevalier;Yohei Sotomi;Angel Cequier

  • Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

    Davide Capodanno;Anna S. Petronio;Bernard D. Prendergast;Helene Eltchaninoff

  • Coronary microembolization: from bedside to bench and back to bedside.

    Gerd Heusch;Petra Kleinbongard;Dirk Böse;Bodo Levkau

  • Safety and performance of the drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold (DREAMS) in patients with de-novo coronary lesions: 12 month results of the prospective, multicentre, first-in-man BIOSOLVE-I trial

    Michael Haude;Raimund Erbel;Paul Erne;Stefan Verheye

  • Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Martial Hamon;Christian Pristipino;Carlo Di Mario;James Nolan

  • Prognostic Value of Intracoronary Flow Velocity and Diameter Stenosis in Assessing the Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Coronary Balloon Angioplasty: The DEBATE Study (Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe)

    P.W. Serruys;C. di Mario;J.J. Piek;E. Schroeder

  • Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group.

    R Erbel;M Haude;H W Höpp;D Franzen

  • Percutaneous Mitral Annuloplasty for Functional Mitral Regurgitation Results of the CARILLON Mitral Annuloplasty Device European Union Study

    Joachim Schofer;Tomasz Siminiak;Michael Haude;Jean P. Herrman

  • Safety and performance of the second-generation drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold in patients with de-novo coronary artery lesions (BIOSOLVE-II): 6 month results of a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, first-in-man trial

    Michael Haude;Hüseyin Ince;Alexandre Abizaid;Ralph Toelg

  • Contemporary Presentation and Management of Valvular Heart Disease: The EURObservational Research Programme Valvular Heart Disease II Survey.

    Bernard Iung;Victoria Delgado;Raphael Rosenhek;Susanna Price

  • Percutaneous Left Ventricular Support With the Impella 2.5 Assist Device in Acute Cardiogenic Shock - Results of the Impella EUROSHOCK-Registry

    Alexander Lauten;Annemarie E. Engström;Christian Jung;Klaus Empen

  • Comparison of intravascular ultrasound and angiography in the assessment of myocardial bridging.

    J Ge;R Erbel;H J Rupprecht;L Koch

  • Comparison of Electron Beam Computed Tomography With Intracoronary Ultrasound and Coronary Angiography for Detection of Coronary Atherosclerosis

    Dietrich Baumgart;Axel Schmermund;Guenter Goerge;Michael Haude

  • Plaque distribution and vascular remodeling of ruptured and nonruptured coronary plaques in the same vessel: an intravascular ultrasound study in vivo

    Clemens von Birgelen;Wolfgang Klinkhart;Gary S Mintz;Alexandra Papatheodorou

  • Letter by Xia regarding article, "High-density lipoproteins and their constituent, sphingosine-1-phosphate, directly protect the heart against ischemia/reperfusion injury in vivo via the S1P3 lysophospholipid receptor".

    Gregor Theilmeier;Christoph Schmidt;Jörg Herrmann;Petra Keul

Frequent Co-Authors

Raimund Erbel
Raimund Erbel University of Duisburg-Essen
Stephan Windecker
Stephan Windecker University of Bern
Ron Waksman
Ron Waksman MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Junbo Ge
Junbo Ge Fudan University
Gerd Heusch
Gerd Heusch University of Duisburg-Essen
William Wijns
William Wijns University of Galway
Pedro A. Lemos
Pedro A. Lemos Universidade de São Paulo
Franz-Josef Neumann
Franz-Josef Neumann University of Freiburg
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Javier Escaned
Javier Escaned Hospital Clínico San Carlos

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in healthcare is essential for anyone interested in medical careers beyond the traditional MD degree. Online programs make it easier to expand your qualifications while balancing work or personal commitments.

For registered nurses, adn to np bridge programs provide a streamlined way to pursue advanced practice roles such as nurse practitioner. Similarly, those who want to move into healthcare administration can learn about how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs to ensure their chosen online MHA degree is accredited and employer-recognized.

If you're passionate about wellness and nutrition, there are several reputable online nutrition degrees that focus on advanced science and dietetics, opening doors in clinical or community settings.

Your RN career can also progress further with online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, many of which offer flexible curricula without in-person clinical requirements. Each of these pathways provides flexible, high-quality educational options to help you achieve your healthcare career goals from anywhere in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Haude

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles