World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
10992
World Ranking
5487
National Ranking
464

Thomas Budde publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Budde sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 265 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Thomas Budde D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Budde sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Absence epilepsy and sinus dysrhythmia in mice lacking the pacemaker channel HCN2

    Andreas Ludwig;Thomas Budde;Juliane Stieber;Sven Moosmang

  • High frequency alternating current ablation of an accessory pathway in humans

    Martin Borggrefe;Thomas Budde;Andrea Podczeck;Günter Breithardt

  • Calcium-dependent inactivation of neuronal calcium channels

    Thomas Budde;Sven Meuth;Hans-Christian Pape

  • Imaging free zinc in synaptic terminals in live hippocampal slices

    T Budde;A Minta;J.A White;A.R Kay

  • Contribution of TWIK-Related Acid-Sensitive K+ Channel 1 (TASK1) and TASK3 Channels to the Control of Activity Modes in Thalamocortical Neurons

    Sven G. Meuth;Thomas Budde;Tatyana Kanyshkova;Tilman Broicher

  • Endothelial TWIK-related potassium channel-1 (TREK1) regulates immune-cell trafficking into the CNS

    Stefan Bittner;Tobias Ruck;Michael K Schuhmann;Michael K Schuhmann;Alexander M Herrmann

  • Impaired Regulation of Thalamic Pacemaker Channels through an Imbalance of Subunit Expression in Absence Epilepsy

    Thomas Budde;Luigi Caputi;Tatyana Kanyshkova;Rainer Staak

  • Membrane resting potential of thalamocortical relay neurons is shaped by the interaction among TASK3 and HCN2 channels.

    Sven G. Meuth;Tatyana Kanyshkova;Patrick Meuth;Peter Landgraf

  • TWIK-related Acid-sensitive K+ Channel 1 (TASK1) and TASK3 Critically Influence T Lymphocyte Effector Functions

    Sven G. Meuth;Stefan Bittner;Patrick Meuth;Ole J. Simon

  • TASK1 modulates inflammation and neurodegeneration in autoimmune inflammation of the central nervous system.

    Stefan Bittner;Sven G. Meuth;Kerstin Göbel;Nico Melzer

  • Prevention of Ca(2+)-mediated action potentials in GABAergic local circuit neurones of rat thalamus by a transient K+ current.

    H C Pape;T Budde;R Mager;Z F Kisvárday

  • Different Types of Potassium Outward Current in Relay Neurons Acutely Isolated from the Rat Lateral Geniculate Nucleus

    Thomas Budde;Ralph Mager;Hans-Christian Pape

  • Correlation of T-channel coding gene expression, IT, and the low threshold Ca2+ spike in the thalamus of a rat model of absence epilepsy

    Tilman Broicher;Tatyana Kanyshkova;Patrick Meuth;Hans-Christian Pape

  • Cytotoxic CD8+ T Cell–Neuron Interactions: Perforin-Dependent Electrical Silencing Precedes But Is Not Causally Linked to Neuronal Cell Death

    Sven G. Meuth;Alexander M. Herrmann;Ole J. Simon;Volker Siffrin

  • The sleep relay—the role of the thalamus in central and decentral sleep regulation

    Philippe Coulon;Thomas Budde;Hans-Christian Pape

  • Postnatal expression pattern of HCN channel isoforms in thalamic neurons: relationship to maturation of thalamocortical oscillations.

    Tatyana Kanyshkova;Matthias Pawlowski;Patrick Meuth;Celine Dubé

  • A bifurcation analysis of neuronal subthreshold oscillations.

    John A White;T. Budde;A. R. Kay

  • T-current related effects of antiepileptic drugs and a Ca2+ channel antagonist on thalamic relay and local circuit interneurons in a rat model of absence epilepsy.

    Tilman Broicher;Thomas Seidenbecher;Patrick Meuth;Thomas Munsch

  • Voltage-activated intracellular calcium transients in thalamic relay cells and interneurons.

    Thomas Munsch;Thomas Budde;Hans-christian Pape

  • Fluorescent Detection of Zn2+-Rich Vesicles with Zinquin: Mechanism of Action in Lipid Environments

    Vladislav Snitsarev;Thomas Budde;Thomas P. Stricker;Jason M. Cox

  • Novel vistas of calcium-mediated signalling in the thalamus

    Hans-Christian Pape;Thomas Munsch;Thomas Budde

  • POSTNATAL EXPRESSION PATTERN OF HCN CHANNEL ISOFORMS IN THALAMIC NEURONS: RELATIONSHIP TO MATURATION OF THALAMOCORTICAL OSCILLATIONS

    Matthias Pawlowski;T Kanyshkova;P Meuth;C Dube

Frequent Co-Authors

Sven G. Meuth
Sven G. Meuth University of Münster
Hans-Christian Pape
Hans-Christian Pape University of Münster
Heinz Wiendl
Heinz Wiendl University of Münster
Raimund Erbel
Raimund Erbel University of Duisburg-Essen
Christoph Kleinschnitz
Christoph Kleinschnitz University of Duisburg-Essen
Thomas Seidenbecher
Thomas Seidenbecher University of Münster
Martin Borggrefe
Martin Borggrefe University of Münster
Günter Breithardt
Günter Breithardt University of Münster
Georgy A. Nevinsky
Georgy A. Nevinsky Russian Academy of Sciences
Ali Gorji
Ali Gorji University of Münster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience unlocks diverse academic and professional opportunities. Many students are now choosing accelerated online programs to fast-track their degrees and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are ideal for learners who want flexibility or need to balance studies with work and family life.

Neuroscience majors often have strong interdisciplinary skills, making them competitive for some of the best bachelor degrees to get in the science and health fields. With a background in neuroscience, graduates can pursue careers in research, biotechnology, medicine, and psychology.

Increasingly, students look for interesting majors that pay well—neuroscience included. These majors promise not only intellectual fulfillment but also strong earning potential and stable job prospects.

For those concerned about costs, there are plenty of online colleges offering affordable programs that accept FAFSA, making a neuroscience education accessible and budget-friendly.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Budde

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles