World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jos B. T. M. Roerdink

Jos B. T. M. Roerdink

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
8950
World Ranking
8280
National Ranking
136

Jos B. T. M. Roerdink publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jos B. T. M. Roerdink sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 277 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jos B. T. M. Roerdink D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jos B. T. M. Roerdink sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jos B. T. M. Roerdink is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research focuses primarily on computer science, with significant contributions to subfields such as computer vision and pattern recognition, computer graphics and computer-aided design, signal processing, information systems and management, and electrical and electronic engineering.

The scientist has published extensively in areas including computer graphics and visualization techniques, data visualization and analytics, advanced vision and imaging, scientific computing and data management, generative adversarial networks and image synthesis, integrated circuits and semiconductor failure analysis, and force microscopy techniques and applications.

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Roerdink are:

  • Interactive image manipulation using morphological trees and spline-based skeletons, 2022, Computers & Graphics
  • Stripe noise removal in conductive atomic force microscopy, 2024, Scientific Reports
  • Visual cluster separation using high-dimensional sharpened dimensionality reduction, 2022, Information Visualization
  • SDR-NNP: Sharpened Dimensionality Reduction with Neural Networks, 2022, Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications
  • Supervised star, galaxy, and QSO classification with sharpened dimensionality reduction, 2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated on multiple projects include Jiří Kosinka, Alexandru Telea, S. C. Trager, Dennis J. Silva, and Ronaldo F. Hashimoto.

Roerdink's work has appeared in several publication venues, notably arXiv (Cornell University), Computers & Graphics, Scientific Reports, Information Visualization, and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Best Publications

  • The watershed transform: definitions, algorithms and parallelization strategies

    Jos B. T. M. Roerdink;Arnold Meijster

  • A morphological algorithm for improving radio-frequency interference detection

    A. R. Offringa;J. J. van de Gronde;J. B. T. M. Roerdink

  • Denoising functional MR images: a comparison of wavelet denoising and Gaussian smoothing

    A.M. Wink;J.B.T.M. Roerdink

  • A general algorithm for computing distance transforms in linear time

    Arnold Meijster;Jos B. T. M. Roerdink;Wim H. Hesselink

  • Changes in cortical grey matter density associated with long-standing retinal visual field defects.

    Christine C. Boucard;Christine C. Boucard;Aditya T. Hernowo;Aditya T. Hernowo;Aditya T. Hernowo;R. Paul Maguire;R. Paul Maguire;Nomdo M. Jansonius

  • Connected Shape-Size Pattern Spectra for Rotation and Scale-Invariant Classification of Gray-Scale Images

    E.R. Urbach;J.B.T.M. Roerdink;M.H.F. Wilkinson

  • The influence of mental fatigue and motivation on neural network dynamics; an EEG coherence study

    Monicque M. Lorist;Eniko Bezdan;Michael ten Caat;Mark M. Span

  • A review of wavelet denoising in MRI and ultrasound brain imaging

    Aleksandra Pizurica;Alle M. Wink;Ewout Vansteenkiste;Wilfried Philips

  • Depth-Dependent Halos: Illustrative Rendering of Dense Line Data

    M.H. Everts;H. Bekker;J.B.T.M. Roerdink;T. Isenberg

  • Volumetric Attribute Filtering and Interactive Visualization Using the Max-Tree Representation

    M.A. Westenberg;J.B.T.M. Roerdink;M.H.F. Wilkinson

  • CPM: a deformable model for shape recovery and segmentation based on charged particles

    A.C. Jalba;M.H.F. Wilkinson;J.B.T.M. Roerdink

  • Accelerating Wavelet Lifting on Graphics Hardware Using CUDA

    Wladimir J van der Laan;Andrei C Jalba;Jos B T M Roerdink

  • Euclidean Skeletons of Digital Image and Volume Data in Linear Time by the Integer Medial Axis Transform

    W.H. Hesselink;J.B.T.M. Roerdink

  • Validation of parkinsonian disease-related metabolic brain patterns.

    Laura K. Teune;Remco J. Renken;Deborah Mudali;Bauke M. De Jong

  • Shape representation and recognition through morphological curvature scale spaces

    A.C. Jalba;M.H.F. Wilkinson;J.B.T.M. Roerdink

  • A neurophysiologically plausible population code model for feature integration explains visual crowding.

    Ronald G. van den Berg;Jos B. T. M. Roerdink;Frans W. Cornelissen

  • Parkinson's disease-related perfusion and glucose metabolic brain patterns identified with PCASL-MRI and FDG-PET imaging.

    Laura K. Teune;Remco J. Renken;Bauke M. de Jong;Antoon T. Willemsen

  • On the generality of crowding: Visual crowding in size, saturation, and hue compared to orientation

    Ronald van den Berg;Jos B.T.M. Roerdink;Frans W. Cornelissen

  • Mastering The Information Age: Solving Problems with Visual Analytics

    Jarke van Wijk;Tobias Isenberg;Jos Roerdink;Alexandru Telea

  • MATHEMATICAL MORPHOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO IMAGE PROCESSING

    Jos Roerdink;G.S.M. Blaauwgeers

  • An Introduction to Digital Image Processing

    J.B.T.M. Roerdink

  • The Watershed Transform

    Jos Roerdink;Arnold Meijster

  • Mathematical Morphology in Image Processing

    Jos Roerdink

Frequent Co-Authors

Natasha M. Maurits
Natasha M. Maurits University of Groningen
Remco J. Renken
Remco J. Renken University Medical Center Groningen
Klaus L. Leenders
Klaus L. Leenders University Medical Center Groningen
Oscar P. Kuipers
Oscar P. Kuipers University of Groningen
Frans W. Cornelissen
Frans W. Cornelissen University Medical Center Groningen
Tobias Isenberg
Tobias Isenberg French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Po Yang
Po Yang University of Sheffield
Sacha A. F. T. van Hijum
Sacha A. F. T. van Hijum KPMG (Netherlands)
Rudi Dierckx
Rudi Dierckx University Medical Center Groningen
David M. Williams
David M. Williams Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students exploring Computer Science in the USA also consider other online degree options, which can offer flexible and affordable pathways to a rewarding tech career. If you're looking to accelerate your studies, an accelerated associate degree could jumpstart your credentials in as little as six months, allowing you to gain key foundational skills and enter the workforce faster.

For those interested in blending tech skills with business acumen, several of the cheapest online business degree programs provide a cost-effective way to gain knowledge in areas like management, marketing, or entrepreneurship. Similarly, you can pursue a cheapest bachelor degree online, making higher education more financially accessible without compromising on quality.

Lastly, aspiring engineers can now study entirely online thanks to advances in remote education. It's increasingly possible to get an engineering degree online, building a technical foundation applicable to numerous fast-growing industries. These flexible pathways let you customize your educational journey to fit your career goals and life circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Jos B. T. M. Roerdink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles